Progressions
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;id=19
great spreadsheet - thanks again.
MM
Cant take all the credit Matt, cps10 gave it to me @ the "other" Roulette Forum! ;)
I dont want to argue with anyone but betting with flat bets only, is a waste of time. The flat bettors say the opposite, I know. Play a "mild progression", another joke. I did so many tests with flat betting, I grew so tired of it. :-\ Ken
Let´s take the well known Martingale
Everyone of us "invented" this first and thought ,W O W so long as it bust.
:-\ :o :( >:( >:D
Here some math´s that shows it won´t work even there are equal quotes (no zero,no house advantage)
So probability for every even chance is 0,5
The Limits at betvoyager are 0.01 to 1000 that means 1 to 100000 spread
with the martingale we could have 17 stages
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024
2048
4096
8192
16384
32768
65536
------
131071
so the fornula goes like this
1/1-(a/a+b)
a = 1 hit
b = 17 losses in a row
our probability is equal 0,5 so we get
1/1-((0.5^1)/(0.5^17))= 65536 winnings
if bust -131071
total of -65535
-50% WOW very crazy,indeed
The reason why this happen is,you always win constantly 1 unit while the sum of the bet grows and grows
the percentage of bet and win isn´t well
1 bet we have 100%
2 bet we have 33%
17 bet we have only 0,001xy %
the Return of investment isn´t constantly
here we have to think different
a constant % without reaching the tablelimit
cu
rcec