VLS Roulette Forum

Main => General Board => Topic started by: Mr J on February 05, 2010, 06:24:47 PM

Title: Question for Steve
Post by: Mr J on February 05, 2010, 06:24:47 PM
I dont want to hear that I'm "starting trouble"....... QUESTION: If you had no site (GW), nothing for sale etc., would you still of had the interest buying VLS?  Ken
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Steve on February 05, 2010, 07:28:05 PM
To answer your question, YES because gambling traffic is very profitable and when I stop teaching AP, I'll be running ads for my site-promotion.com clients. But if by your question you mean nothing at all for sale including advertising, then the answer is NO, but I would still keep RF as I enjoy it and love roulette. Next question.
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Mr J on February 05, 2010, 07:34:44 PM
You're right, I was not clear. Yes, I meant including advertising but you answered 'no', thanks.  Ken
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Mr J on February 07, 2010, 10:25:26 PM
@Steve >> You could probably answer this in 30 seconds so dont act like I'm taking up your entire day. Of your current mods HERE (global or not) how many are MAINLY AP guys and how many MAINLY are not? Ken
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Steve on February 07, 2010, 10:43:49 PM
J what's with the pointless questions? You attack me on GG and appear to be here only trying to catch me out on something, or trying to get me to say something you can twist. Then you and your buddy spike scratch each other's backs in attacking me. Look if you are bitter about being banned on RF, proceed with what you said before - that you'd wage jihad on me. Very mature. Or maybe understand the RF members voted you out, not me. That was something like the third poll to ban you and each time you were nominated by members, and each time the results were close to 50/50. If you read my post I said I supported you not being banned so take it out on someone else.

Nevertheless to answer your question, out of the mods, I think there are only 3 not including me and victor. I know poit understands that 1 + 1 does NOT equal 2. I dont know Berliner bruce. I have barely exchanged a word with him - he was a mod before I got here. I do not know what Davey's focus is - I barely know him but am prepared to give him a go. What they believe is NOT IMPORTANT provided they are capable of emotion-free and accurate moderating.
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Mr J on February 07, 2010, 10:55:09 PM
"out of the mods, I think there are only 3 not including me and Victor" >>> 3 what? 3 total or 3 AP guys? You sure get nervous with EASY questions. "if you are bitter about being banned on RF" >>> Did not even know that until now. I won, you just dont "understand" it. (How could you of won Ken, you got banned? lol You dont get it) Steve, if you are ONLY liked by your "crew", STOP BLAMING ME. You can NOT buy friends and respect. Ken
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: bombus on February 08, 2010, 12:24:49 AM

I've been a moderator here for a while now, long before Scamopolous took over.

I can totally appreciate the science and commonsense involved with AP techniques, and would agree with AP proponents that as the game now stands, physics methods are the only ones that stand a chance of being proven accurate.

That said, I am not an AP player. I do however try and incorporate some physical connections or conditions within the methods I try to develop.

So, Bombus = mainstream, not AP.  

----------------------------


Therefore, there are  presently 4 moderators.

Not counting Steve & Victor

Berliner Bruce - Bombus - Poit - Davey-Jones.

Poit & Bombus are non-AP

Berliner Bruce & Davey-Jones are AP.

50/50.
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Steve on February 08, 2010, 12:39:03 AM
Ah Bombus sorry I forgot to count you. There you go Ken, Bombus is not an AP and do you think it affects what a fine gentleman I consider him to be? Do I think his style of play even remotely affects his ability to moderate? Not in the slightest.

You know Davey and I havent really gotten along fantastically here, yet you say I choose mods that support me 100%. Sorry Ken, but when considering Davey what he might think of me has nothing to do with it. I only care about his willlingless and ability to moderate as per basic rules that are virtually identical on any forum.

Quote from: Mr J on February 07, 2010, 10:55:09 PM
You sure get nervous with EASY questions.

You would like to believe that. But cant you read Ken? I answered your question. I said I know Poit supports AP, but I dont know about the others. Sorry but you hit a brick wall, again. If you are here just to cause trouble, go do it on GG with your buddy spike. If you want to stay here, try contributing something other than needling, and yes you do know that's what you are doing. If you have a problem with being banned on RF, dont take it out on me - the members voted. Just stop dancing on the line - I hate dancing with the stars - bad tv show.
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Mr J on February 08, 2010, 08:20:50 AM
Calm down Steve, it was a question. No one is out to "get you".  Ken
Title: Re: Question for Steve
Post by: Steve on February 08, 2010, 06:52:43 PM
I wear tin foil on my head so the CIA cant read my thoughts (yes of course joking)

Ken, on GG you declared jihad against me. And even now you continue to post rubbish there attacking me. You are out to cause trouble. I suggest you just get on with contributing and stop asking pointless questions because I'm not interested in games.