Hello guys... been talking with proofreader and doing a lot of research lately. I'm a US player so playing live isn't the easiest thing. anyways... I have been using his zig zag method on an RNG table. Here's how it works for those of you who dont know.
We use this sequence of numbers:
1/2/3/2/3/1/3/1/2/1/3/2/1/3/2/3/1/3/1/2/1/2/3/2/1/3/1/3/2/3
if the sequence goes 1/2, 2/3, or 1/3, then we bet on dozen 1&2, 2&3, 1&3
if the sequence goes 3/2, 2/1, or 3/1, then we bet on collums 3&2, 2&1, 3&1
The idea is to use this sequence so the RNG can't catch onto your system. I use a few rules when playing this method:
1) Play no more than 10 minutes at a time
2) Never start the sequence over again
3) wait atleast 1 1/2 hours between sessions and delete cookies each time (proofreaders suggestion)
4) only use .25 base bets until my bankroll significantly grows
So my question is... what type of betting works best here? Seems as though a 1,3,9 etc. progression will be the most profitable, but the highest risk. at the same time, if we are only playing short session, seems like the progression is safe enough to use. Before anyone comes in here saying how stupid i am, yes i know everytime you use a progression there is a risk of going broke. anyways... what do you guys think? progression, and if so, what type of progress. or flat betting?
Thanks in advanced!
Bryant
and I want to thank proofreaders for helping me out so much already... this is just a post to get an idea from some other people as well! :thumbsup:
Reversed D'Lambert (add +1 on win, subtract 1 on a loss) with two dozens is quite good especially for short playing periods as the above strategy. I will be interested to see some results :yes:
P.S you should start covering the 0 when the stakes go >5 per dozen.
Quote from: chovek69 on April 16, 2010, 02:19:54 AM
Reversed D'Lambert (add +1 on win, subtract 1 on a loss) with two dozens is quite good especially for short playing periods as the above strategy. I will be interested to see some results :yes:
P.S you should start covering the 0 when the stakes go >5 per dozen.
add 1 on a win... subtract 1 on a loss.
so lets give an example to see if i understand
bet amount/win or lose
1 / win
2 / win
3 / lose
2 / lose
1 / win
2 / win
3 / win
4 / lose
3... etc etc??
anyone have any actual tests they did with the 2 dozens method using this betting that they could share? thanks!
that's exactly like this. It is far more bankroll sparing then 1 2 9 27.
Here some testing.
Spin Number Type Bet Unit Win Loss Net Unit Bal. Bet Layout
0 0
1 26 Bet 2 0 -2 -2 -2 1 : 1st Dozen,2nd Dozen
2 23 Bet 2 3 -2 1 -1 1 : 2nd Dozen,3rd Dozen
3 35 Bet 4 6 -4 2 1 2 : Column B,Column C
4 18 Bet 6 9 -6 3 4 3 : 2nd Dozen,3rd Dozen
5 12 Bet 8 12 -8 4 8 4 : Column A,Column C
6 3 Bet 10 15 -10 5 13 5 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
7 14 Bet 12.5 0 -12.5 -12.5 0.5 .5 : 06 : Column A,Column C
8 1 Bet 10.5 15 -10.5 4.5 5 .5 : 05 : 1st Dozen,2nd Dozen
9 29 Bet 12.5 18 -12.5 5.5 10.5 .5 : 06 : Column A,Column B
10 25 Bet 14.5 21 -14.5 6.5 17 .5 : 07 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
11 24 Bet 16.5 24 -16.5 7.5 24.5 .5 : 08 : Column B,Column C
12 17 Bet 18.5 27 -18.5 8.5 33 .5 : 09 : Column A,Column B
13 10 Bet 20.5 30 -20.5 9.5 42.5 .5 : 010 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
14 29 Bet 23 33 -23 10 52.5 1 : 011 : Column B,Column C
15 31 Bet 25 36 -25 11 63.5 1 : 012 : 2nd Dozen,3rd Dozen
16 9 Bet 27 39 -27 12 75.5 1 : 013 : Column A,Column C
17 29 Bet 29 42 -29 13 88.5 1 : 014 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
18 23 Bet 31 0 -31 -31 57.5 1 : 015 : Column A,Column C
19 10 Bet 29 42 -29 13 70.5 1 : 014 : 1st Dozen,2nd Dozen
20 9 Bet 31 0 -31 -31 39.5 1 : 015 : Column A,Column B
21 23 Bet 31 45 -31 14 53.5 1 : 015 : 1st Dozen,2nd Dozen
22 28 Bet 33 48 -33 15 68.5 1 : 016 : 2nd Dozen,3rd Dozen
23 11 Bet 35 51 -35 16 84.5 1 : 017 : Column B,Column C
24 29 Bet 35 0 -35 -35 49.5 1 : 017 : 1st Dozen,2nd Dozen
25 25 Bet 33 48 -33 15 64.5 1 : 016 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
26 21 Bet 35 51 -35 16 80.5 1 : 017 : Column A,Column C
27 21 Bet 37.5 0 -37.5 -37.5 43 1.5 : 018 : 1st Dozen,3rd Dozen
28 1 Bet 35.5 0 -35.5 -35.5 7.5 1.5 : 017 : Column B,Column C
29 5 Bet 33.5 0 -33.5 -33.5 -26 1.5 : 016 : 2nd Dozen,3rd Dozen
30 36 Bet 31.5 45 -31.5 13.5 -12.5 1.5 : 015 : Column A,Column C
Not bad but the progression should be restarted at certain point.
Thanks Chovek69, TheNewBigMack :thumbsup: