VLS Roulette Forum

Main => General Board => Topic started by: Mr J on September 02, 2010, 10:05:56 PM

Title: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: Mr J on September 02, 2010, 10:05:56 PM
I use to own this method years ago but somehow lost it. If I remember correctly, it was not too bad a method. Does anyone have this to post?  Ken
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: TicTacToe on September 02, 2010, 11:14:12 PM
Ken

Check your eMail

TTT
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: Mr J on September 02, 2010, 11:21:22 PM
THANKS, much appreciated.  Ken
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: xman1970 on September 03, 2010, 04:12:54 AM
some people tried it here Mr.J  ;)


nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/jack-kennedy-sqaure-ro-let-system-sounds-incredible/ (nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/jack-kennedy-sqaure-ro-let-system-sounds-incredible/)

& there is/was a download link..... :good:

Happy reading...... :rtfm:
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: Ekis on September 03, 2010, 08:26:54 AM
Hi,

May I have copy of the methoh as well?? ::)
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: bombus on September 03, 2010, 10:59:12 AM
Quote from: Ekis on September 03, 2010, 08:26:54 AM
Hi,

May I have copy of the methoh as well?? ::)

the d is like 3 keys away from the h - wtf? :biggrin:
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: graham44 on September 07, 2010, 05:02:44 AM
Hello. I have been playing Jack's positional roulette where you  bet four numbers from the last colour that has hit,either clockwise or anti clockwise,but you never\play the last number that has hit unless it has hit twice in the last 15 spins.

Your positions you bet are  from the last colour and number hit   1 2 3 4 or 5 6 7 8 or 2 3 4 5 or 6 7 8 9 either  clockwise or anti clockwise.

You need 5 hits in 37 spins to give you a profit.

My initial testing of this system has been  amazing,is anyone esle interested in testing this?
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: John Gold on September 15, 2010, 05:49:05 PM
I was playing in the casino tonight and seriously getting a good hiding.  I took in 700 and was down to about 200 after 2/3 hours of torture trying to play a system on the hoof. 
Lesson to be learned: never try and tinker with stuff in real play.  It is a recipe for disaster.
So I ditched that and after reading all about this square ro let last night, I gave it a go.  I am pretty certain that I did not manage to play it excactly the way it should be played and I will need to go over it all again.  But on saying that, I got back up to my starting 700 and quit feeling like I had really got out of jail.
This square ro let thing is pretty impressive.  There were times when it felt like I had the ball on a piece of string and it was just following my bets around the wheel.  I was never really in any one particular section of the wheel for more than a few spins and yet my bets kept hitting.  Now it could all be dumb luck and I was just having some good fortune for for a change.  My gut tells me otherwise and this needs looking into further.  Just thought I would share my experience.
Title: Re: Jack Kennedy Square Roulette Method.....anyone have it?
Post by: graham44 on October 23, 2010, 12:15:25 PM
Quote from: graham44 link=topic=16921. msg120076#msg120076 date=1283846564
Hello.  I have been playing Jack's positional roulette where you  bet four numbers from the last colour that has hit,either clockwise or anti clockwise,but you never\play the last number that has hit unless it has hit twice in the last 15 spins. 

Your positions you bet are  from the last colour and number hit   1 2 3 4 or 5 6 7 8 or 2 3 4 5 or 6 7 8 9 either  clockwise or anti clockwise. 

You need 5 hits in 37 spins to give you a profit. 

My initial testing of this system has been  amazing,is anyone esle interested in testing this?

Obviously not then :(