VLS Roulette Forum

Main => Brainstorming => Topic started by: Norman Bates on September 03, 2010, 05:48:51 PM

Title: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 03, 2010, 05:48:51 PM
AR

12 chips on 0,00 split
5 chips on the first, and second 12
5 chips on the first, and third column of 12.
10 chips on 2,8
12 chips on 5,11
15 chips on 15,21
17 chips on 18,24
5 chips on 25,31
7chips on 28,33





Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: bombus on September 03, 2010, 06:48:57 PM
Hello Norman Bates.

I just tried this system. It took 511 spins to eat up my whole 1200 chip buy in.

It did manage to get up to 1868 before the crunch came.

Oh well, back to the drawing board for this one. :)
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 03, 2010, 07:37:26 PM
But you said you made six hundred chips?
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: bombus on September 04, 2010, 04:08:58 AM
Yes. Then lost 1800 chips.
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: cheese on September 04, 2010, 05:02:44 AM
Which means some of the time you'll lose 1800 before you win 600. Oops.
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 07:15:55 AM
Perpetual motion is not possible. You said that at some point you were ahead by six hundred.  What's wrong with that?  If you want more action, color up your chips. 
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: bombus on September 04, 2010, 08:12:29 AM
It's like cheese said...

My example shows that it is entirely possible to lose your 1200 chip bankroll.

Let's say a second player approached the same wheel and began to play this system just after I had made my 600 chips and cashed up.

This second player did their nuts and was none the wiser of my profit.

--------------------

cheese is good, wine is better, but cheese and wine together... oh, yeah... :)
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 08:13:55 AM
that is sooo wrong!!!
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: bombus on September 04, 2010, 08:17:04 AM
Quote from: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 08:13:55 AM
that is sooo wrong!!!

What, you don't like cheese & wine?
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 08:19:24 AM
I don't know, but what if Betty Crocker comes to the table?
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 10:36:36 AM
But to answer you question about leaving the table, have you ever thought that if you lose your bankroll that instead of getting stuck for whatever cash you have left, just going to work, and coming back after you've made more money?  You really need to leave, and come back.  It's all right to walk away right? Besides, no one wants to live forever. 
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: cheese on September 04, 2010, 04:54:08 PM
Quote from: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 08:13:55 AM
that is sooo wrong!!!

No its not. Whats makes you think you'll win before you lose every time? You don't know what the wheels going to do.
Title: Re: "Hang Time", My Last Thread.
Post by: Norman Bates on September 04, 2010, 05:45:55 PM
My calculations are based on the information given me by a software package used to design, build, and analyze all kinds of different roulette systems, and strategies.  I'm sure you've heard of it.  It's called Xtreme Roulette 2.0, but I've never won every single time, no. I've had to stop, and redo the whole thing more than once.  So, in that respect, you are right.  I don't know what the wheel is going to do.  I've never tested this strategy playing for real money. So, at this point it's all conjecture.  It's just a theory.  Anything can happen.  OK?