I'll address some of the rubbish the strange man Ion Saliu (nolinkss://nolinks.gamblersforum.com/index.php?threads/ion-saliu-nutjob-aka-saliu-com-parpaluck-charlatan.14763/) said. Keep I mind this is a man that claims to have the holy grail to beat RNG, and sells even lottery number-picking software and books about all sorts of rubbish that are 100% ineffective. I'm not sure what his problem is, but he's accusing me of pirating his methods when he knows nothing about them. He based it all on a demo video on my site, but he knows nothing about what I teach. I'll clear a few things up:
* He first claimed I pirated his system, saying he invented a system where you predict in half-wheel sectors. This man is strange. He is referring solely to the video at nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/1hrdemo.wmv (nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/1hrdemo.wmv) where I demonstrate very basic accuracy of a simple method, and to make things simple I demonstrate with half-wheel accuracy. Do you use half-wheel predictions in reality? NO! What you bet on depends on the analysis. In fact often if you bet a sector that is too large or too small (more specifically, too few areas), then you dilute your edge. Ion would have no clue about this - he appears to be an amateur who has even attacked the concept of roulette computers stating they just cant work, and that not even NASA could create an effective one.
I knew of Ion for a long time, and briefly saw the rubbish on his site, about roulette, gambling and more. Any experienced player would see his theories and understand he really doesn't know anything. I contacted him briefly about 5 years ago to query his claim that he had the "holy grail".. Yeah he we go again, another CEH. But I gave him the benefit of the doubt, despite his theories being muddled up. After that I forgot he existed.
Then almost a year ago, someone told me that on his site he was claiming that I pirated his system. I read what he wrote, and the man is just really strange. Anyway I emailed him the following:
Dear Ion,
I have just been alerted to your pages at nolinks://saliu.com/roulette-millions.html (nolinks://saliu.com/roulette-millions.html) and nolinks://download.saliu.com/roulette-piracy.html (nolinks://download.saliu.com/roulette-piracy.html)
My first impression is basically thinking "what on earth is he taking about?". I have never seen any of your systems, and based on what you have said you obviously know very little about our systems. I have only just reviewed some of your gambling theory which unfortunately cannot be used to overcome the house edge. But I dont want to argue on this point. I just want to correct your misconceptions below:
The video demo you referred to demonstrates half-wheel accuracy. Why? Because the wheel is circular and we are demonstrating a basic principle. And if accuracy is greater than 51%, then accuracy is better than random, of course assuming a statistically relevant group of samples. Either way the video is just a basic demo.
Does our system predict half-wheel? Only one element, which is bias. Bias occurs for many reasons, such as wheel wobble, worn bearings etc. You did not invent bias analysis and neither did we, and I find it ludicrous you claim you did. I suggest you read our free evaluation document at nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/gw.zip (nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/gw.zip) so you get a better understanding of what we teach - legitimate "advantage play" methods, which do include bias, although very few of our players rely on bias to increase their winnings. Bias is roughly 5% of the total of what we teach.
As for whether or not bias analysis works, I suggest you research the matter instead of misleading your visitors. Every wheel has some bias, although usually it is too small to beat roulette alone, which is why any found bias is incorporated into our method to achieve maximum accuracy. We basically combined legitimate patterns for a combined edge - we call this culmination of patterns a "custom variant".
With the exception of half-wheel bias as explained above, our system does NOT predict the half of the wheel. You are obviously unaware that on most wheels, betting as much as 19 numbers actually dilutes your edge.
It appears your systems are mathematically based. You cannot beat roulette with mathematics. If you think you can, I suggest nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/100k.html (nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/100k.html)
You claimed that our announcement to stop selling our system is the result of us being scared because of "piracy". That is just plain ridiculous. Firstly it is nowhere near piracy - it is just your ignorance - I dont mean this in an offensive way, but ignorance and "jumping the gun" is exactly what has happened. Secondly, our reasons for not taking on new players soon is exactly as we stated.
Ion, clearly you have made an error here. You have attacked us thinking we had copied something of yours, without you have any idea about our systems. I've now made you aware of this. Whether or not you correct the issue is up to you.
I got no response to the email. He just continued to blindly attack me.
* He claims I asked him for his program source code. This is absolute rubbish. His methods are based on gambler's fallacy, and cannot work. I have absolutely no interest in his methods with the exception I think I contacted him about 5 years ago because he claimed to have the holy grail, despite his underlying theories being completely wrong. I asked if he'd be willing to sell it as per the terms at nolinks.genuinewinner.com/100k.html (nolinks://nolinks.genuinewinner.com/100k.html) - he declined, and given that based on what he says about roulette, Ion Saliu is just another Charles Edward Hampshire - where he makes outrageous claims of having the holy grail, but knows squat about roulette. I have made the same offer to many people who claim to have the holy grail. Sure, who wouldnt buy it for $100k if strict proof of effectiveness is provided?
* He claims my youtube videos were removed because I apparently pirated his system. Again, his systems are based on gamblers fallacy and cannot work. Forester published all of Ion's attacks against me on his site, because it suits him. Forester also has no interest in the truth, but he himself would know from Ion's material that the man's entire approach to roulette is a joke. The video was removed because someone deceived youtube, probably him. It was of the video of spanish bias players who did well. I make it very clear these players are NOT my players - they are simply other players who used some of the techniques I teach. I have NEVER claimed they are my players and when people ask me about it, I clearly state they used bias, and it's part of what I teach, but in reality very few of my players use bias analysis because there are far better methods. My point of showing the video is that advantage play and legitimate methods to beat roulette exist.
* Ion claims I secretly use his program to do analysis for my players. The only program of his I've seen is DOS. I dont use any DOS or command-line programs. This was years ago. From recollection, Ion claimed to have the holy grail to beat even RNG spins. Only in his most recent material has he understood the relevance of real wheels. But he still thinks he can beat roulette with probability alone.
Most of what Ion said is just immature personal nonsense, and stuff he has no idea about. I think he's literally deluded. That is the last I'll bother with him. If I wasted time on every moron, it would be a wasted life. I have no interest in anything he sells. If he really thinks I copied anything of his, his condition is not good. If he one day finds he was mistaken, people like him have too much pride to apologize and correct themselves.
To be honest, I think this Ion guy is certainly a sandwich short of a picnic. :sarcastic:
I used to be a member on his forum and I was afraid to post anything because he practically accused everyone of being a casino spy/shill if you dared ask him a question. If he really did not like you, he would just call you an idiot.
How does that work? I suppose it's a good deflection from answering any questions about his methods.
You need only look at a small part of his material to understand he doesnt know what he's talking about. I am so over dealing with morons - they are everywhere. He's just another one.