ARTISTIC AMERICAN ROULETTE STRATEGIES
These Take Out All The Guess Work!
8X2
For this example to work, your bet on 1 number (either 0 or 00) should be no higher than 27 chips. Put the left over chips on the opposite number to match the chip count your working with.
2 chips on numbers 13,15,22, and 24
4 chips on 2nd dozen, column B, and numbers 8, and 29
8 chips on numbers 4,6,31,33, and 17/20
13.5 chips on numbers 0, and 00
91, 105, and 118 chip count. 1,800 buy-in
8X3
For this example to work, your bet on any 1 number (either 0, or 00) should be no higher than 25 chips. Put the left over chips on the opposite number to match the chip count your working with.
2 chips on1st dozen, 3rd dozen, and numbers 8,14,23,29
4 chips on column B, and 16/19,18/21
8 chips on 4,6,31,33,17/20
12.5 chips on 0, and 00
89, 102, and a 114 chip count. 1,800 buy-in
8X4
For this example to work, your bet on 1 number (either 0, or 00) should be no higher than 27 chips. Put the left over chips on the opposite number to match the chip count your working with.
4 chips on numbers 8,14,23,29,16/19, and 18/21
4 chips on 1st dozen, 3rd dozen, column A, and column C
8 chips on numbers 4,6,31,33, and 17/20
13.5 chips on 0, and 00
107, 120 and a 134, chip count 1,800 buy-in
We are talking about the bets that are wagered on numbers 0, and 00 here. You have to know what number came up last. Whether it be 0, or 00.
There are 3 chip counts in each listing from above. So, when a number comes up you only move the chip count for the opposite bet up one notch. Also, never lower a bet when the" repeat" number doesn't win. Always press it one notch. Which by the way, is the reason why you have to keep track of what number had come up last.
Start out using the middle chip count from each one of the examples above. Like 121 listed in example 8X4. Then, when one of the numbers wins, you always increase the bet on the opposite number So, don't bet the "repeat"number.
Your wager should not drop below, or rise above the chip counts listed in each example. Your bet should always be inside one of the chip counts listed above.
Norman mate,
I wish i had good news but this method dosent work.
no matter how you play, would you bet that much money if you had that much money, no you wouldnt cause you would of lost all your money, this is not the way to go.
maybe look for a trigger to help you win.
Please allow me this. I'm too close to give up now. I really feel I'm on to something, and I just can't seem to be able to walk away from it just yet...So, Please, Humor me, and thank you for the advise> OK
Norm,
How many times and how many people have to continue to tell you that you have entirely too much money on the table at one time with any of these ideas?
You're not close to anything except a horrible crash at the table on the day you actually do go and play.
The "logic" is flawed right from the start and just runs downhill wiith the progression of the bets!
Try getting a lot of that excess money off the table. As it is, you're fighting yourself and praying for "greens" to show up. It should be patently obvious that almost every one of your ideas is a "hope for a zero to show up" type of play. If that's the idea, then why all the money on the rest of the table?
I know you hate it when I comment on your stuff, and you think I'm picking on you but I'm just trying to see if you'll head in a better direction and maybe come up with a viable play.
AD
I'm sorry ADulay, and I respect your opinion, (like everybody else on this forum seems too!). I just don't think you know what your talking about, that's all...
The little guy had my post changed after he had seen the finished product. Him I could understand, because he was COURTEOUS. So, I respect his opinion, and so, It makes me wonder, do you even test these things?
Besides, why to you care how much money I have?
try using the example individually of each other. Like is you use the first example for instance. Just play the 108 chip count on the strategy. Or the 122 total chip counting listing on the strategy. See how they add up then.
P.S. When can we look at this master plan roulette system that you keep harping on, and that you win so much with a monthly check from?
Quote from: Norman Bates on February 02, 2011, 05:45:42 PM
I'm sorry ADulay, and I respect your opinion, .... ...I just don't think you know what your talking about, that's all...
Norm, I'm taking checks out of my online casino on a regular basis. That should give me some credibility, right?
Quote from: Norman Bates on February 02, 2011, 05:45:42 PM
The little guy had my post changed after he had seen the finished product. Him I could understand, because he was COURTEOUS. So, I respect his opinion, and so, It makes me wonder, do you even test these things?
Norm,
I'm the ONLY guy who tests your stuff as I can't believe you really post it up and I'm just hoping that I'm missing something big when I test it. They all crash and burn horribly! I used to post up the RX graphics after a test but you told me to stop doing that for some reason!
Quote from: Norman Bates on February 02, 2011, 05:45:42 PM
Besides, why to you care how much money I have?
I really don't care how much money you have. I do care about how much money gets put on the table in an unrealistic attempt to win anything, which you've still not even come close to demonstrating!
Quote from: Norman Bates on February 02, 2011, 05:45:42 PM
try using the example individually of each other. Like is you use the first example for instance. Just play the 108 chip count on the strategy. Or the 121 total chip counting listing on the strategy. See how they add up then.
I can see perfectly well how they add up. They DON'T and that's what everyone is trying to tell you but you will not see it for some reason.
Once again, I have nothing personal against you but as you can plainly see, nobody will even attempt these plays for even testing purposes, let alone real money plays!
AD
norman i did try this method and it went bankrupt, i tried all.
still no strategy eh ADulay ? I think you two are grifters.
why don't you go and play for real on you methods and post your results ?
You meant for personal reasons right?
And I think Norman is having ball.
Dance baby dance.
LOL :yahoo:
You know, it's very disconcerting when you make a serious attempt to help somebody and they call you names.
I don't get it.
Will somebody else please help Norman as he thinks I'm a "grifter", whatever that is.
AD (was that on Star Trek or something?)
PS.... Hmmmm, just looked it up. For some reason Norm believes I'm trying to swindle him. Very odd usage of the word for sure. Oh well, once again I can exit the thread and let him post up for all the world to revel in.
Enjoy!
Hilarious. And I don't mean that in a condescending way; this is high humor. I don't get it and probably never will, but man does it crack me up. Norm, I don't doubt your sincerity for a minute, and that's the best part. Anybody ever heard of Sisyphus?
It reminds me about that guy Ziggy. Or like the guy who swam half way across the ocean, and started back because he was afraid it was too far to go on...