Lot's of peeps are looking for the holy grail to beat roulette....but if some1 finds it what would be the reaction of the casino's?....just sit there and think 'oh no there goes our profit'?
Looks like as soon some1 finds it that would be the end of roulette as we know it.
So arn't all those peeps who spend so much money and time on this actually killing what they trying to find?
The designers of systems are not looking for a Holy Grail .There is no one.Systems can give a profit on small terms.A system can give more pleasure than playing random without sense.The best way is to combine a system with a proved strategy.
This is a great question - seriously.
When I used to trade stocks/commodities 24/7 I found the "Holy Grail" for the stock market.
Simply "dollar cost average" (don't buy all at once, buy multiple times over time) and never sell - the SPY (S&P 500).
It averages 12%/yr for over 100 years and no one in those 100 years has ever demonstrated they could out fox the market.
Believe it or not this is very hard to do - folks listen to idiots like Cramer every day and get greedy and in the long run do much worse than 12%/yr for 100+ years. Basically their need for greed dooms them.
What would the "Holy Grail" look like in the gambling world? Just how greedy are you?
In Roulette, I've found my Holy Grail - at the end of 1 hour, I'm down 1/37 or 2/38, of what I've bet, and got 4+ free drinks and a lot of entertainment watching folks make fools of themselves.
So; what's your need for greed? Just how much does the universe owe you for your gambling excursions?
Quote from: harald on February 12, 2011, 09:25:08 AM
Lot's of peeps are looking for the holy grail to beat roulette....but if some1 finds it what would be the reaction of the casino's?....just sit there and think 'oh no there goes our profit'?
Looks like as soon some1 finds it that would be the end of roulette as we know it.
So arn't all those peeps who spend so much money and time on this actually killing what they trying to find?
hmmm,
say out of 100,000 people one has a winning system but he dosent want the casino to know so he bets small but at alot of different casinos. the casinos still rakes alot of money so thats why they are still here.
is there a H.G, maybe, just because you havent found it dosent mean there isnt one. most people dont give away there systems and theres only a handful that are really good.
for every 1 million people there are proberly only 10 people that consistently win.
everyone plays different so what works for one might not work for another.
Quote from: darrynf on February 19, 2011, 11:54:29 AM
hmmm,
say out of 100,000 people one has a winning system but he dosent want the casino to know so he bets small but at alot of different casinos. the casinos still rakes alot of money so thats why they are still here.
is there a H.G, maybe, just because you havent found it dosent mean there isnt one. most people dont give away there systems and theres only a handful that are really good.
for every 1 million people there are proberly only 10 people that consistently win.
everyone plays different so what works for one might not work for another.
Exactly. If there is a winning system, it would not be the end of roulette. The ratio of consistant winners to loosers would obviosly be a huge diffrence.
James.