After the number 27 plays--play 27, 11, 22, 33, 00 for up to nine spins, using progression.
GIVE IT A TEST...
NEW KEN.
hi ken,
I just ran a quick test, flatbetting on a single zero wheel. interesting result (see attachment).
cheers
hans
all numbers have a equal chance of hitting. no magic numbers.
Much thanks, Hans.
My tests so far have been limited--plus they use double zero results.
NEW KEN :biggrin:
HERE is a test using double zero results I got here on VLS---I think there are only 3 "misses".
NEW KEN
7
29
17
18
14
30
6
4
9
36
33
27 *
9
24
23
7
20
1
21
00 ***(8 spins)
23
7
24
23
11
0
22
24
6
32
36
35
16
1
3
7
12
26
7
34
3
10
16
31
35
12
4
10
35
10
18
4
24
34
1
15
28
25
3
3
18
30
26
29
9
2
15
17
28
17
26
10
0
21
34
0
30
8
2
0
24
28
11
19
1
12
23
20
21
7
25
34
11
23
7
31
20
13
33
25
29
21
26
20
6
15
26
12
5
14
15
20
27 *
33 ***
20
26
21
4
4
21
35
28
35
25
28
31
15
26
4
5
23
24
35
3
35
0
25
9
33
12
21
18
11
23
21
11
29
26
36
10
15
31
6
14
25
16
00
27*
35
3
26
23
1
36
1
19
27 ***(9 spins)
25
35
7
9
21
38(? ... Unless this was one of my nos.)
10
32
12
6
23
36
7
26
6
29
6
32
30
11
7
9
1
7
0
34
29
3
24
14
16
30
6
7
0
8
21
00
17
5
21
29
32
7
8
7
13
18
12
16
0
33
1
36
27*
11 ***
32
35
24
10
20
10
3
23
24
1
28
31
00
22
17
12
27*
18
23
1
1
19
11***(6 spins)
11
23
00
10
0
3
15
20
00
36
8
12
20
11
29
6
20
13
32
0
7
18
20
18
19
7
0
19
28
23
33
00
4
6
36
16
8
22
9
34
10
1
25
13
31
24
13
21
31
4
36
18
1
2
17
25
34
22
32
25
25
21
22
28
26
29
16
22
28
7
30
1
33
36
32
13
36
31
00
15
36
12
1
8
23
28
11
15
33
12
20
20
3
19
16
17
20
31
22
36
7
34
3
36
36
4
2
16
14
33
6
23
18
25
1
28
00
34
34
36
13
27 *(n0 result)
20
8
8
4
12
28
16
12
36
30
14
19
16
25
25
18
17
30
19
34
3
26
2
22
34
19
17
12
11
0
16
23
29
4
30
24
25
00
36
28
19
33
8
34
30
14
10
34
19
24
17
7
0
25
32
24
18
0
6
24
7
2
16
9
35
14
14
17
23
26
25
16
5
31
8
17
22
19
5
7
8
30
34
14
9
17
34
16
1
24
36
00
5
10
15
15
35
36
3
36
30
22
1
26
17
0
23
33
16
11
27 *
22 ***
8
24
2
20
3
7
11
14
7
8
11
28
35
26
32
18
17
7
26
9
33
29
30
14
22
8
13
36
17
36
36
22
23
25
00
28
21
30
11
26
5
29
5
15
29
25
16
29
35
21
21
29
31
31
28
31
17
37(?)
5
13
7
24
19
1
29
31
22
31
27*
22 ***
11
19
7
0
30
00
10
3
18
23
13
8
1
34
25
15
32
32
11
36
33
27*
4
19
22***
29
36
7
5
17
32
7
2
7
2
6
3
25
23
36
31
14
4
16
16
25
4
11
9
19
11
32
36
13
34
4
15
13
5
11
10
12
00
5
3
7
9
3
23
0
19
30
7
18
11
13
22
26
26
3
19
7
20
11
18
27*
2
29
22***
18
16
18
16
35
34
1
11
8
19
5
9
22
15
11
27*
13
13
8
17
22 ***(5 spins)
28
5
11
31
18
26
34
35
27 *
35
12
25
28
27 ***(5 spins)
26
22 (2 spins)
8
38
1
15
22
31
4
29
29
5
32
17
00
4
3
36
14
19
19
5
1
33
30
12
26
24
30
31
3
31
10
6
37(?)
00
24
30
10
12
25
3
2
20
3
21
6
13
15
35
13
36
1
14
26
11
24
35
18
9
33
4
29
13
5
32
00
16
5
17
20
32
20
16
23
35
15
27*(no result)
6
18
10
29
29
9
29
31
21
4
18
29
12
26
31
0
31
25
13
34
25
8
13
7
32
3
14
25
36
16
34
4
14
9
35
7
11
21
2
6
35
7
17
8
2
3
6
23
8
35
18
20
4
28
32
18
19
8
20
36
21
14
10
3
32
0
9
22
22
8
1
28
24
5
34
27 *
21
31
21
36
6
12
29
9
22 * (9 spins)
37(?)
23
12
20
21
14
17
28
35
20
10
34
24
3
25
24
16
24
25
8
28
21
4
10
10
33
21
16
21
28
31
7
12
26
35
10
26
25
12
21
25
34
27*
21
13
21
13
24
9
7
11***(8 spins)
15
27*
5
34
21
22*** (4 spins)
5
15
15
1
21
16
30
32
13
33
19
18
27*
10
9
28
13
22 ***(5 spins)
35
33
1
15
2
9
6
28
28
13
2
4
11
0
36
30
1
4
30
21
30
30
31
19
35
27*
33***
18
33
0
32
30
22
20
14
2
26
00
1
25
36
23
10
14
5
31
7
5
23
35
30
7
32
30
13
8
19
32
30
12
34
11
1
00
30
31
14
3
15
25
22
29
32
28
36
17
13
9
10
17
6
22
1
9
34
36
10
23
20
23
21
10
33
3
5
36
24
1
19
34
33
36
8
32
5
9
2
30
23
14
7
7
AND HERE'S ANOTHER SHORT TEST using Mr J's actuals from here at VLS.
Mr J's actuals---
27 appeared 18 times.
13 hits within 7 spins
5 no-hits(10 spins to hit ...or more)
NEW KEN
32
28
2
18
00
4
1
27 *
1
19
13
12
23
20
27 ***(7 spins)
21
9
11***(3 spins)
13
21
9
3
9
20
20
8
21
5
27*
14
12
22 ***(3 spins)
23
19
14
30
1
18
23
7
11
7
26
6
10
19
27 *
21
21
34
27***(4 spins)
31
7
32
00***(4 spins)
13
0
- - -
4
23
14
27*
27***(1 spin)
12
32
31
7
2
25
17
1
28
16
26
11 (12 spins---no result)
5
17
25
7
- - -
9
31
3
8
17
12
3
12
18
8
27*
12
13
7
11***(4 spins)
28
24
12
15
16
23
4
8
25
16
3
14
00
36
2
26
30
5
36
5
18
10
5
19
31
32
3
15
12
34
10
12
30
19
4
4
8
33
10
7
21
18
30
33
- - -
12
20
10
00
12
16
8
18
29
24
13
29
30
21
24
24
20
31
6
8
13
9
21
7
13
3
23
5
18
32
17
11
35
25
12
32
21
17
21
23
25
00
19
18
25
36
2
25
2
14
4
29
17
11
9
26
28
31
27*
16
7
10
12
17
30
- - -
27***(7 spins)
8
0
27***(3 spins)
17
26
8
15
14
27***(6 spins)
31
15
21
35
13
7
31
13
15
13
13
1
10
18
14
7
9
17
9
33 (20 spins---no result)
36
22
27*
28
30
27***(3 spins)
29
34
33***(3 spins)
9
36
35
1
4
4
- - -
13
1
32
12
23
14
9
10
34
19
18
19
11
29
32
5
35
23
3
33
20
7
20
27*
36
18
6
2
13
26
18
34
23
24
3
0
14
11 (14 spins—no result)
14
10
24
3
25
19
8
11
32
34
6
14
27*
19
31
3
21
26
36
31
17
24
4
18
2
27 (13 spins---no result)
- - -
28
19
7
23
11***(5 spins)
13
9
34
13
33
18
5
12
21
21
8
6
18
31
22
7
00
27*
1
29
30
21
19
19
10
15
0
17
4
1
15
9
33 (15 spins---no result)
31
10
26
32
5
9
32
7
9
I took the same permanence and the same numbers. only this time I used number 1 as a trigger. please look at the attachement for the bankroll ballance trend.
maybe I just picked a permanence in which the chosen numbers appear pretty often. I'll run another test with the same permanance and a randomly picked trigger and set of numbers to bet on and see what will happen then.
cheers
hans
Here's another from my Magic Book of Numbers:
After the number 11 plays, flat bet 27, 3, 24, 36 for 7 spins.
I only lost 2 "sessions" using these (KIMO'S) double zero results.
Won 300/ Lost 56===profit 244.
NEW KEN 8)
(21 "sessions" of the number 11)
USING NOS= 36- 24 -27 -3
W=300, L=56
WON=244
11 *
0
22
24 24 (3 sp) W=23
6
32
36
35
11*
23
21
11*
29
26
36 36 (6sp) W=11
10
15
31
6
11*
32
35
24 24 (3sp) W=23
10
20
10
3
11*
11*
23
00
10
0
3 3 (6sp) W=11
15
20
11*
15
33
12
20
20
3 3 (6sp) W=11
19
11*
0
16
23
29
4
30
24 24 (7sp) W=7
11*
27
22
8
24 24 (4 sp) W=19
20
3
11*
26
5
29
5
15 *********
29
25 (no win)
11*
36 36 (2 sp) W=27
33
27
4
19
22
29
11*
9
19
11*
32 32
36 36 (6sp) W=11
13
34
4
15
13
11*
18
27 27 (3 sp) W=23
2
29
22
18
16
11*
8
19
5
9 ********
22
15 (no win)
11*
27 27 (2 sp) W=27
13
13
8
17
22
28
11*
31
18
26
34
35
27 27 (6 sp) W=11
35
11*
24 24 (1 sp) W= 31
35
18
9
33
4
29
11*
15
27 27 (2 sp) W=27
5
34
21
22
5
11*
0
36 36 (2 sp) W= 27
30
1
4
30
21
11*
1
00
30
31
14
3 3 (6 sp) W=11
15
And here's the same test on another of Kimo's actuals:
Mohegan Sun Casino, Connecticut
6 hits/2 losses
NEW KEN
33 21 15 24 35 28 11 32 4 3
21 35 17
8 2 26 11 28 15 14 4 14 27
25 22 6 3 12 31 30
24 28 9 25 17 11 22 8 1 25 27
14 5 0 18 16 16 1 4 21 22 36 4 6 5 35 22 33 2 25
20 21 16 9 16 25 9 36 4 9 25 10 12 16 6 33 30 10 25 23 22 6 31 24 18 0 25 22 26 0
9 23 34 3 34 25 22 20 4 24 35 3 0 7 14 34 6 4 29 27 3 26 12 35 3 10 30 7 35 00
15 34 32 33 4 4 1 14 24 8 21 24 24 15 36 30 00 18 12 30 9 9 32 33 28 34 18 00 27 24
0 25 11 21 3
33 20 28 1 23 7 14 31 3 21 30 19 35 4 2 12 7 17 34 14 2 24 30 19 36
9 10 16 29 4 1 24 1 12 20 35 19 31 21 11 0 1 0 9 9 24
20 9 32 7 32 19 22 27 17
14 34 8 3 10 30 18 33 0 5 34 28 2 21 4 9 16 8 24 26 2 13 6 31 33 4 00 21 3 14
25 33 35 29 00 00 31 16 7 1 12 23 14 25 6 8 25 5 25 30 1 4 34 30 7 23 14 29 25 19
19 19 10 8 00 25 29 0 25 34 23 00 35 0 17 00 2 32 4 19 22 30 33 33 22 4 31 26 15 13
34 24 20 33 30 0 10 29 34 28 29 25 28 25 00 11 15 31 16 9 33 25 18(lost)
16 27 9 33 27 2 15
30 31 31 1 21 7 9 26 33 2 1 20 34 26 31 29 00 20 32 20 20 19 3 30 5 2 24 2 00 26
21 29 20 24 20 6 34 6 25 36 6 20 23 11 9 18 1 30 27 21 30 12 26 4 10 21 31 5 10 5
18 5 1 16 27 1 31 32 0 8 27 11 31 17 13 20 20 13 15 (lost)
31 23 29 14 0 25 30 34 17 27 15
31 5 5 21 9 5 31 6 13 2 13 14 28 17 4 00 29 22 19 30 22 32 9 35 6 00 0 4 24 35
(Total 450 spins, 14 Zero, 14 Double-Zero, 208 black, 214 red)
SO...when playing after the number 11, I play 3, 27, 24, 36 (for six or seven spins---flat bet or progression).
Sometimes, if I decide to play 6 nos, I include nos 7 and 15.
New Ken.
Interesting results. Why have you chosen those particular numbers to bet on? Is there some common factor to them - are they related in some way?
Also, any theories as to why you seem to be winning with these numbers? Is it just plain luck, is something else going on here?
Quote from a truly professional gambler forwarded by Nathan Detroit:
****how these dorks figure that running a million computer decisions is going to help a person at the tables in ANY cosino in this ecountry is beyond me .....but the sheep flock to these illogical ramblings like it was the Gospel....and end up paying the price (their money).....****
I agree with his staement.
N.D.
To Nullified:
All one has to do is test (and debunk, if so) the sets of numbers I gave to follow 27 and 11.
Try the six nos I gave for 11, flat betting for up to 6 spins---or with a proper progression.
New Ken.
The software I'm having made will check for any anomalies in sequences of numbers and groups of numbers, permutations and all. It will deal with a lot more than what happens after just one number. Do I expect to find anyting with rng? Nope, but worth a try since software will do it all.
My results of a 450 sample are 11 zero :13 double zero: 210 Red;216 black; 208 even;218 odd; 207 high;219 low.
With small deviations it is all predictable.Maths does not lie.All long run test gives the same results.
THIS...is a debunk??
TEST FIRST...using some ACTUALS/RNG found here on the site.
SHOW THE RESULTS.
I'm sure you can do it...
New Ken.
Plus, after the number 1 appears, I play double nos :00, 11, 22, 33---and 26--- for six spins.
TEST and see...
NEW KEN 8)
Why the debut of number 26 in that series?
What`s the connection?
Funny thing happened. Just right after I read your post and went to the SaveLine Casino.Right at the moment when I got there the number 1 showed I placed bets on 0/2/11/22/33/26 and the number that won om the first spin was 0 and at the fourth spin # 11 hit.
This at a single 0 wheel therefore I substituted the # 2 fo the 00.
This does not mean that I am endorsing this method in any form or manner . I considered it just DUMB LUCK .
I still favor the quote of a professional gambler :
*****how these dorks figure that running a million computer decisions is going to help a person at the tables in ANY cosino in th ecountry is beyond me .....but the sheep flock to these illogical ramblings like it was the Gospel....and end up paying the price (their money).....*******
The last people I would trust are those who come up with systems , show them off, and never venture into a casino.
N.D.
I think I'll stop posting these things---they're obviously contentious, because I am simply suggesting that certain numbers bring particular numbers more often than not---and the math people would never see eye to eye with that.
In my country we have a numbers game using 1 to 36--- a "pick one", so to speak. Its origin is attributed to chinese immigrants---and they do believe in the above philosophy of numbers.
A bit of research into this made me keep an open mind.
But no else has to, okay.
NEW KEN 8)
New Ken ,
What are you upset about ? Were you awaiting a thunderous ovation and low bows in your direction ? Nothing wrong with your system. But consider the time involved until the trigger, which in your case happens to be # 1 , makes an appearance.
So be happy if you are winning with your system . Considert the superstition in your country a blessing, just ignore the math nazis, the nay sayers, and above all ignore the true experts known here in the USA as " WISE GUYS".
Those Wise Guys have more experience under theii belly than you can count flies on a pile of cow manure.
Nathan Detroit.
HAPPY WINNINGS !!!
Actually, it wasn't about "ovations"---
My plan is that each number has about 4-6 other numbers that routinely follow--- that you can play for about 4-6 spins each.
So, there's no need to wait...
New Ken