People i wish to ask to answer with honesty , which system is your favourite. A few systems i personally like are winstike 4 (pattern 4 slight mod) by john the ledgend (a fantastic roulette author) kingspins bingo roulette . Cpr roulette (chuck sutton). Thr r- pro sector system i found very good (usually) the odd draw down happens to rattle the nerves some times but i did find the r -pro sector system pretty good. Even chances i never played a great deal to be honest but i wish to ask some of the pro roulette gamblers on here which they honestly think is :-
A - What is your favourite even chance system.
B- What is your other favourite system that is not even chance.
I am working on making new systems again , it seems though that virtually every idea has been tried before ;D
Kingspin winstrike 4,with a change of bet selection if manque /passe fail,I bet odd or even,so far it worked.
THE PPPC CWS BET :haha: :haha: :haha: :haha:
:diablo: :diablo: :diablo: :diablo:
AVE SATANAS !
... .. -))
Kingspin you ask for favourite systems.Every system will fail on the long run.With a good strategy and a skill player there is a chance for a profit.
Playing on a roulette I have a strategy for all ECs ,dozens, columns ,sixlines and streets.I play as well as the RNG as the live roulette in my housecasino.I make a profit of about 50 units per hour.
Many years ago I knew a few guys who were professional blackjack players. They were taking some serious money from the casino. The manager insisted that they start playing some of the other table games or they would be banned from playing blackjack.
They started playing Roy Ward Dickson's 'hot number theory' for roulette. The rules are floating about in cyberspace somewhere. It involves just backing a single number for about 9/10 spins when it qualifies.
Now only one number can come up at anyone time and from their point of view, it might have made sense to play this way in order to limit their losses but I can remember them winning regularly with it.
What interested me recently is that I was reading some of the AP forums and a few of the posters were talking about this method and one or two of them sweared by it as a genuine approach to winning at roulette.
So it may be worth taking a look because the method seems to be a favourite of some of the pros.
I believe Roy Ward Dickenson's system was tested extensively and failed like everything else.
ok guys thank you for your reply's. Have a read at my post "amazing luck ends in massive failure". Same board as this.