In roulette circles Jean le Rond d´Alembert :give_rose:(1717-1783) is associated with "Progression d´Alembert" One step up after losing and one step down after winning. A few examples: -1-2-3+4+3+2 = 3. And 1+1+1-1-2-3 = -3. The player from the French Age of Enlightenment might be balanced. And Red and Black might be in balance. But this balance is not reflected in the last example. We are not at the lowest level!
"Contre d´Alembert" is contrary to "Progression d´Alembert": One step up after winning and one step down after losing. I do not think that it is worth trying it on Even Chances :diablo:. I rather try it in a flexible way on these known t. simples, six lines or DS (Double Streets): 1. = 1-6
2. = 7-12
3. = 13-18
4. = 19-24
5. = 25-30
6. = 31-36.
I bet the groups that came IN THE LATEST FOUR SPINS. The average is just a little bit more than three groups. Within four sessions I once bet only one DS. 63 X two DS, 159 X three DS, and 68 X four DS.
The session ends when I have won on level 10. My first four sessions (from the first four days of 2011, table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden) resulted in a nice profit:
181+87+27+375 = 375. 375 units or chips.
:smile: KEEP AN EYE ON THE LATEST FOUR SPINS!
3
13
29
20..Place one chip on DS 1, DS 3, DS 5, and DS 4.
20..Hit! That means one step up: TWO chips on each relevant DS, say DS 3, DS 5, and DS 4.
0.. Loss. One step down. ONE chip on DS 5, and ONE chip on DS 4.
13..Loss. There is no step down from here! Say one chip on DS 4 and one chip on DS 3.
3..Loss. One chip on DS 4, one chip on DS 3, and one chip on DS 1.
28..Loss. One step on DS 3, one step on DS 1, and one chip on DS 5.
5..Hit! One step up. Place TWO chips on each relevant DS: Three groups.
And so forth and so on.
Each session ends after a hit on the 10TH level. Good luck!
Dane