VLS Roulette Forum

Roulette System Development & Testing => Testing Zone => Topic started by: MattyMattz on September 09, 2008, 11:06:49 AM

Title: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 09, 2008, 11:06:49 AM
Okay, as promised, I will post my live results playing my 5 lines method.  Please note that it was mostly thrown together to re-test Victors "50% MM Plan" (nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/vls-50percent-money-management/ (nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/vls-50percent-money-management/))

This time round I wanted a system that would bet more "consecutively" - that is, not have to wait 20 spins for a repeating line (as per my last test).  Although that worked, I am looking for something a little quicker. 

Instead of playing after repeating lines only, I am applying Victors "5 lines" method, in which you track the 6 lines and bet that the line won't repeat it's previous jump FROM THAT LINE.  So, for example, last time we had line 5 hit, it went to line 1.  So now when were on line 5, we bet that it won't jump to line 1 again.  I am betting every spin (once the tracking board fills up enough) except after a loss, in which I wait for a virtual win before betting again.

My goal is still 10% of my Main BR, which starts at 200, with a 2nd and 3rd BR of 200$ each (so total BR 600$).  I will be 1 unit until my first loss, then after my virtual win, will bet 10 units (in hope's to recoup and gain profit).  If, at any time, I am -200 (or thereabouts) I will call it quits.

Here are my first 3 sessions from last night.

Session 1:

[table=,]
Line,Jumps,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MBR:,200
1:,2,4,6,[0],,,,,,,,,,,,,2BR:,200
2:,2,1,3,1,2,5,,,,,,,,,,,3BR:,200
3:,3,4,1,3,6,2,6,2,,,,,,,,,4BR:,0
4:,3,2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5:,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Goal:,20
6:,3,[3],[3v],5,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
w,w,w,w,w,w,w,L,Vw,w,L,VL,Vw,w,w,w,w,,
1,1,1,1,1,1,1,-5,0,10,-5,0,0,10,1,1,1,,
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,2,2,12,7,7,7,17,18,19,20,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MBR:,210,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4BR:,10,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Spins:,27,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
[/table]


Session 2:

[table=,]
Line,Jumps,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MBR:,210,
1:,5,1,2,,,,,,,,,,,,,,2BR:,200,
2:,6,[0],3,4,3,2,6,,,,,,,,,,3BR:,200,
3:,1,3,6,1,,,,,,,,,,,,,4BR:,10,
4:,0,2,6,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5:,2,5,2,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,Goal:,21,
6:,4,2,5,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
L,Vw,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,
-5,0,10,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,
-5,-5,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MBR:,220,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4BR:,21,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Spins:,29,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
[/table]

Session 3:

[table=,]
Line,Jumps,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MBR:,220,
1:,3,5,[5],,,,,,,,,,,,,,2BR:,200,
2:,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,3BR:,200,
3:,6,3,2,5,1,,,,,,,,,,,,4BR:,21,
4:,1,[1],,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5:,6,5,6,5,6,2,,,,,,,,,,,Goal:,22,
6:,4,[4],6,[6],3,5,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
w,w,w,L,VL,Vw,w,w,w,L,Vw,w,L,Vw,w,w,w,,,
1,1,1,-5,0,0,10,1,1,-5,0,10,-5,0,10,1,1,,,
1,2,3,-2,-2,-2,8,9,10,5,5,15,10,10,20,21,22,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MBR:,231,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4BR:,32,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Spins:,23,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
[/table]



Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 09, 2008, 11:10:45 AM
A couple notes to point out:

L=Loss
w=Win (duh)
VL=Virtual Loss
Vw=Virtual Win

[2] = brackets indicate the loss
[2v] = indicates virtual loss

Hope it makes sense... if not - tough.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: cps10 on September 09, 2008, 11:53:59 AM
Looks good Matt. I have loved the line skips for sure.
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 09, 2008, 12:08:23 PM
Session 4:

[table=,]
Line,Jumps,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,MBR:,231,
1:,5,1,2,3,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,2BR:,200,
2:,6,[0],3,4,3,2,6,,,,,,,,,,,,3BR:,200,
3:,1,3,6,1,6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,4BR:,32,
4:,0,2,6,3,1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5:,2,5,2,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Goal:,23,
6:,4,2,5,3,4,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
L,Vw,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,w,
-5,0,10,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,
-5,-5,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
MBR:,242,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
2BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
3BR:,200,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
4BR:,44,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Spins:,33,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
[/table]

I also just had a session in which I lost some on the higher progerssions (25 units x5).  So I'll post that one too, to show how I recover.  (after a -50, I recover with 2 x 25 unit bets... hopefully).  Obviously a loss would most likely end the session, or come close.


Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: djroulette on September 11, 2008, 07:33:32 AM
Hi Matty

Just wondering if you were using a progression to cover losses or not?and if so what is it?

Dj
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: mistarlupo on September 11, 2008, 11:42:49 AM
Hey Matt,
Really nice work, thanks for sharing! I'm also impatient to see the recovery session you mentioned... :)

But as I remember you used a bit different bet selection in your post on the other thread.
I'd like to know why you used different one this time, just curious :)

Regards,
M
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 11, 2008, 12:04:36 PM
Quote from: djroulette on September 11, 2008, 07:33:32 AM
Hi Matty

Just wondering if you were using a progression to cover losses or not?and if so what is it?

Dj

I was using a 1,5,25 progression.  A loss on the 25 unit step would stop the session.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 11, 2008, 12:12:07 PM
Quote from: mistarlupo on September 11, 2008, 11:42:49 AM
Hey Matt,
Really nice work, thanks for sharing! I'm also impatient to see the recovery session you mentioned... :)

But as I remember you used a bit different bet selection in your post on the other thread.
I'd like to know why you used different one this time, just curious :)

Regards,
M

Hey Mistar,
sry for the delay.  I screwed up and copied over my recovery session, but once I get another one, I'll post it. 
The reason I switched the bet selection was just to see if the MM plan is really the driving factor, not the system used. 

I have tested this MM Plan with about 6 different systems and all are showing profit, so that's a good thing!

MM
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: VLSroulette on September 11, 2008, 11:41:50 PM
Matty, thanks a bunch for sharing your tests.

Seeing you derived benefit from this 50% plan sure makes my day a brighter one.

Big hug [smiley=im/dude_hug.gif]

[smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: TwoCatSam on September 12, 2008, 12:07:17 AM
Matt

This multiple-bankroll might be just what the "Sniper" needs to turn it into a winner.

I must study it more!

Sam
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 14, 2008, 01:58:03 AM
Hey Gang,

sry I haven't been posting much about this play lately... don't fret though.  I'm still using it (exclusively) and winning with it.  Just today I played a couple of sessions on DB with Dong watching and was successful. 

I've been busy trying to make this as safe as possible.  Although I really like the 5 lines, I put it aside for a week and tested the 50% MM with 3 lines.  During all my testing it showed great results, but sure enough come live play time it flopped... twice.  lol. 

So I've done back to the 5 lines (Vic's method... which I call jumping lines) and have played the following today.  3 BR's, 200$,200$,100$.  Goal each session is 10% but I'm only using 2 step progression.  My starting unit is determined by taking my Main BR and dividing it by 100 (then rounding it.)  After a loss (on the first step) I will make my next bet 3x the base unit.  If I lose that bet, it's the end of the session.  I was finding that although the losses are small with more steps... the progression just gets out of hand when betting 25x base unit.  So 2 steps max.  Also, if, during a session, you encounter 2 losses (at your base unit) you cut the goal in half... so if your goal was 20$, it would now be 10. 

Of course, the my version of the 50% MM idea stays the same... build multiple BR's, while increasing your MBR. 

So far today, I've played 10 sessions.   A short summary is below:

[table=,]
session,MBR,Goal,End Profit/Loss,New MBR,2nd BR,3rd BR, 4 BR
1,200,20,+20,210,200,100,10
2,210,21,+20,220,200,100,20
3,220,22,-40,180,200,100,20
4,180,18,+10,185,200,100,25
5,185,18,+18,194,200,100,34
6,194,19,+19,203,200,100,44
7,203,20,+20,213,200,100,54
8,213,21,-38,175,200,100,54
9,175,17,+17,183,200,100,63
10,183,18,+10,188,200,100,68
[/table]

My starting units have been 2$/line.  I'm liking the results so far.  Even with the two losses, my MBR is only 12 units down, yet I've managed to build a new BR to 68$.  Sessions aren't very long and I know that although it's slow going now, once the BR's get built, the win's will become larger.

I'll try and play another 5 or so sessions tonight and post the results.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: TwoCatSam on September 14, 2008, 09:31:06 AM
One more comment and I swear I'll shut up......

The day Victor devised that  [table=,] syntax, he moved this forum from confusion to clarity!!

Thanks for your work, Matty. 

Sam
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 14, 2008, 11:12:23 AM
Played 3 more sessions... of course I had to lose a couple.  Still playing it though.  Major goals will be creating new BR's without losing one.

[table=,]
session,MBR,Goal,End Profit/Loss,New MBR,2nd BR,3rd BR, 4 BR
1,200,20,+20,210,200,100,10
2,210,21,+20,220,200,100,20
3,220,22,-40,180,200,100,20
4,180,18,+10,185,200,100,25
5,185,18,+18,194,200,100,34
6,194,19,+19,203,200,100,44
7,203,20,+20,213,200,100,54
8,213,21,-38,175,200,100,54
9,175,17,+17,183,200,100,63
10,183,18,+10,188,200,100,68
11,188,18,-34,154,200,100,68
12,154,15,-40,114,200,100,68
13,114,11,+6,117,200,100,71
[/table]

Playing again this morning, so I'll post those results in a bit, when I'm done.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 14, 2008, 12:31:41 PM
[table=,]
session,MBR,Goal,End Profit/Loss,New MBR,2nd BR,3rd BR, 4 BR
1,200,20,+20,210,200,100,10
2,210,21,+20,220,200,100,20
3,220,22,-40,180,200,100,20
4,180,18,+10,185,200,100,25
5,185,18,+18,194,200,100,34
6,194,19,+19,203,200,100,44
7,203,20,+20,213,200,100,54
8,213,21,-38,175,200,100,54
9,175,17,+17,183,200,100,63
10,183,18,+10,188,200,100,68
11,188,18,-34,154,200,100,68
12,154,15,-40,114,200,100,68
13,114,11,+6,117,200,100,71
14,117,11,-16,101,200,100,71
15,101,10,+6,104,200,100,74
16,104,10,+5,106,200,100,77
17,106,10,+5,108,200,100,80
18,108,10,+5,110,200,100,83
[/table]


Morning sessions so far... lots of losses in the sesssions so the gains have been slow, but they have been climbing... slowly.  Since I'm getting 2+ losses per session (almost always) my goal is cut in half.  I'm liking this rule so far.  It's limiting the profit, but atleast it's walking away with something.  Hoping I make the 4th BR hit 100 before my MBR drops again.

Matt

Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 14, 2008, 01:54:38 PM
Hey gang,

won 2 more small wins (+6 each).  Although it's going well, I'm finding that he wins aren't big enough to sustain the losses.  Although I'm slowly growing the 4th BR, the MBR isn't going up as well, and is slowly getting lowered.  I'm thinking of increasing the progression, not by adding steps but by making the 2nd step larger to recoup faster.  The losses will be bigger but so will the wins, plus they'll be quicker.

I'll have to test it out and let you know.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 14, 2008, 11:24:12 PM
Just a quick note...

after looking over past sessions, I've noticed that LLL is very rare, so I'm thinking of playing an "aggressive" version of the 5 lines.  Playing a 5,25 unit progression, only after LL and never when it's betting on a repeating line to not-repeat again... I'll explain better later, but I'm gonna give it a whirl.  I figure I need to bet more to make it worth while as the betting opps. are few and far between.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 15, 2008, 03:01:23 PM
Just a quick update on the agressive version with LL... it worked very well, but the wait is too long for my liking.  After 500 spins I was up 67$... and that's betting 5 or more units.  I'm looking at something else (progression after the L's) right now.

Cheers,
Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:03:07 PM
I hope the wins can continue, but I agree, $67 in about 12 hours' time is aggravating I am sure!
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: MattyMattz on September 16, 2008, 12:40:10 PM
Hey CPS,

Yes, it was a long session, but it was one of the tougher sessions I've seen.  Not many LL's, but when they did happen, lot's of LLL's followed, which isn't common.  Most session's have a few LL's and almost never LLL.... but I was happy how it never really dropped.  The low was -28.5$ (or thereabouts)... not bad for 500 spins.

Matt
Title: Re: Matt's 5 line Test - Part 2
Post by: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:42:09 PM
That isn't bad at all.