QuoteDo you have any calculations that could be used to bet on the next color?
If you play for 100 hands and you would like to have an idea as to what the next color could be.
Can that be done?
Thomas is this what you are looking for...
Here is one graph level betting - even chances - no progression, RNG.
(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Fimg222.imageshack.us%2Fimg222%2F9249%2Fcorectionnr1yl2.jpg&hash=26a358c0b8fa26e6971d20b359419f99d4dacba9)
Cheers Lucky Strike [smiley=rolleyes.gif]
I forgot to answer your question. [smiley=shocked.gif]
The answer is yes, if you wondering if there exist a method to calculate and a strategy to predict the next colour for even chances.
Cheers Lucky Strike ;)
Thanks for answering thomas [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]
Let's see what he says about it! [smiley=smiley.gif]
Quote
I forgot to answer your question. [smiley=shocked.gif]
The answer is yes, if you wondering if there exist a method to calculate and a strategy to predict the next colour for even chances.
Cheers Lucky Strike ;)
[smiley=shocked.gif] What is it? can you explain it ? [smiley=huh.gif]
Regards
[highlight]J Daniels here i used 4 units, level bets, 5 sessions and gain 15 units[/highlight]
If you are interested then i can tell you how to calculate, use windows, and how the march for indications work. It takes time and so far it looks good but it has not been tested for the long run.
This is the values.
Singels has the value 1
Series of 2 the value 0
Series of 3 the value 1
Series of 4 the value 2
Series of 5 the value 3
And so it goes...
And you add those numbers to get a statistical ecart of 3,5.
I have only try this for singels contra series.
2
2
2
2
1 >>> window 37 spins
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1 18:2
2
2
2
2 won +1
2 won +2
2 won +3
1 loss
2
1
2
1
2
2
1 loss
1
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
2 loss
1
1
2 loss
1
1
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
2 loss
2
1 loss
1
2 loss
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
2 >>> window 31 spins
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2 16/0
2 won +1
1 loss 0
1
1 won +1
2 loss 0
1
2
2
2 won +1
1 loss 0
1
2 loss -1
1
1
1 won 0
2 loss -1
2
2 won 0
2 won +1
2 won +2
1 loss +1
1
1 won +2
1 won +3
2 loss
2
2 won
2 won
2 won
2 won
1 loss
1
2 loss
2
2 won
2 won
1 loss
1
2 loss
1
1
1 won
1 won
2
2
1 loss
2
1
2
2
2 won
1 loss
2
1
1
2 loss
1
1
1 won
1 won
1 won
1 won
2 loss
2
1 loss
2
2
1 loss
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
2 >>> window 30 spins
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2 16/1
1
1
1
1 won +1
2 loss 0
2
2 won +1
2 won +2
1 loss +1
1
1 won +2
1 won +3
1 won
1 won
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1 loss
2
2
2 won
1 loss
2
1
1
2 loss
1
1
2 loss
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
2
1 >>> WINDOW 47 SPINS
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2 22/0
2 won +1
2 won +2
2 won +3
2 won
1 LOSS
1
2 LOSS
1
1
2 LOSS
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2
1
1
2 >>> WINDOW 39 SPINS
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1 20/2
1 won +1
2 loss 0
2
2 won +1
1 loss 0
1
2 loss -1
2
2 won 0
1 loss -1
2
1
2
2
2 won 0
2 won +1
1 loss 0
2
2
2 won +1
2 won +2
2 won +3
2 won
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
QuoteIf you are interested then I can tell you how to calculate
Sure I am [smiley=vrolijk_26.gif]. It looks nice, we will see the test results.
Regards JD
[highlight]J Daniels i just want to show you a short test i made. I wanted to see how far i would get whit 3 units. Wagering 28 times. Profit 14. Loss 0.
[/highlight]
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1 18:2
2
2
2
2 won +1
2
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2 16:0
2 won +1
1
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2 16:1
1
1
1
1 won +1
2
2
2
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2 22:1
2 won +1
2
2
2
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
1 18:0
1 won +1
2
2
2
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1 19:1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1 won +1
2
1
1
1
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1 16:1
2
2
2
2 won +1
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
1
2 window
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2 19:1
1
1
2
2
2
1 LOSS
1
2 LOSS
2
2 WON
1 LOSS
1
1 WON
1 WON
2 LOSS
2
2 WON
1 LOSS
2
1
2
1
2
2
2 WON
2 WON +1
2
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2 23:0
1
1
1
1 won +1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
2 26:0
1
1
1
1 won +1
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
1 23:2
2
2
2
2 WON +1
2
2
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
1 21:2
2
2
2
2 WON +1
2
2
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
1
2 17:1
1
1
2
2
2
2 won +1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
2 20:2
1
1
1
2 loss
2
1 loss
2
2
2 won
2 won
2 won +1
1
1
1
1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It looks good so far, but I need a further explanation
Regards
JD
Umm, did I make such a quote?
Hmm, I will have to look at my posts again.
lol - where did you find this post it make me think like 2 years back and about Marigny and Cut Point Method
Cheers
Quote from: I have cookies on July 04, 2009, 08:04:17 PM
lol - where did you find this post it make me think like 2 years back and about Marigny and Cut Point Method
Cheers
Hmmm,
Yeah, I guess so.
Still looking for the quote I made.
It says "Quote Thomas Grant" as the topic.
But what was my quote? Still looking it up.
Well this is what I remember.
You wrote and ask that some where then I copy it and qoute you and made this post.
It is not your qoute it is me that qoute what you ask.
Cheers
this looks interesting I just wish I understood it. There are values assigned for streaks of 1 through 5, is 3 the value for a run of 5 or greater? or are there more values for runs of 6 (six in a row), runs of 7, etc? and don't understand the rest, just see a bunch of 1's and 2's, don't get what's going on, oh well, if anyone wants to explain it better that would be nice.
Hi Simon
1 and 2 is the same as Red and Black
I use random.org
That you can see above is about Marigny de Grilleau and hes Cut Point Methodology.
Cheers
thanks, is this Cut Point Methodology explained elsewhere in more detail?
can you explain when and why and what are the bets in the examples above, and what does 18:2 indicate, etc?
Marigny de Grilleau and hes Cut Point Methodology is hudge.
You can ask Victor or JLP.
But they don't have the same material as i have.
With Margny you use series and singles and measure them with different methods depending on what event you want to capitalize on.
Then there is rules that it has to happen with in a frame of events.
To make a long story short i don't have the strength to give lessons about it.
If they do i might jump in with some comments.
Cheers
ok I found some things with google, thanks.
Books › "marigny de grilleau"
Showing 1 Result 1. Das Gesetz der kleinen Zahlen by Kurt v. Haller (Paperback - Mar 31, 2004) - Import
1 Used & new from $57.85
found this book at Amazon, saw picture of cover, obviously about roulette, unfortunately can't read it (unless there's an english translation somewhere.)
............ and "Methode Grilleau" article at win-maxx about chasing six numbers that have hit 3 times, to hit again in 37/38 spins.
Quote from: Lucky Strike on July 05, 2009, 07:44:37 PM
Well this is what I remember.
You wrote and ask that some where then I copy it and qoute you and made this post.
It is not your qoute it is me that qoute what you ask.
Cheers
Ohh, I see..
Ok that was it then.
Thanks for clearing that up.
I ask lots of questions.
I ask so many.
That I often forget what the questions are.
Thanks again.
To T Grant:
Why do you write like every paragraph is a haiku? You probably think its clever, in reality its quite annoying.
Quote from: Spike on July 07, 2009, 01:17:14 AM
To T Grant:
Why do you write like every paragraph is a haiku? You probably think its clever, in reality its quite annoying.
Glad that I keep annoying you.