KingSpins Power Winner splits System.
Here are the power winner splits below.
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25 24:27 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 25:28 27:30 32:35
c) 7:10 8:11 9:12 18:21 20:23 31:34 33:36
Three Groups A . B . C.
Wait until any of the group hits twice consecutively then bet on the group using 1 2 3 progression.
When you hit a win stop . Then track again.
I have seen something like this as well. Do you have results from testing yet?
Sorry i have no results . I have had good results on live wheels , very good results but i have not done any extensive tests.
Quote from: Kingspin on September 25, 2008, 04:32:39 AM
KingSpins Power Winner splits System.
Here are the power winner splits below.
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25 24:27 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 25:28 27:30 32:35
c) 7:10 8:11 9:12 18:21 20:23 31:34 33:36
Three Groups A . B . C.
Wait until any of the group hits twice consecutively then bet on the group using 1 2 3 progression.
When you hit a win stop . Then track again.
Thanks for sharing your system...Can this be used also on American Roulette?
It's for single 0 only. It has not worked too good on double 0.
There has been a way to adapt it to the double zero. Have you found out how to do that yet, Kingspin? After all, the 0/00 split can be incorporated in the right spot I am sure.
RickW00716
If you want one for a 00 wheel fire up your copy of RX, select "single zero" and click off the above groups individually and then select "wheel frequency" to see how the coverage for each works.
Once you have determined the coverage, make up your own for a 00 wheel. Or, if you can find it, get a copy of Huey T's split plan that was once posted at VIP. It made money for a lot of folks. Tweak it to suit your play and BR.
Quote from: Kingspin on September 25, 2008, 04:32:39 AM
Here are the power winner splits below.
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25 24:27 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 25:28 27:30 32:35
c) 7:10 8:11 9:12 18:21 20:23 31:34 33:36
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25<-- 24:27<--- 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 --->25:28 --->27:30 32:35
These numbers repeat are they ment too ??? ?
Yes you're alright Fluker, I would like to know also! This method is simple so I like it and I want to try :-)
Quote from: Fluker on September 28, 2008, 02:40:15 PM
Quote from: Kingspin on September 25, 2008, 04:32:39 AM
Here are the power winner splits below.
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25 24:27 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 25:28 27:30 32:35
c) 7:10 8:11 9:12 18:21 20:23 31:34 33:36
a) 0:3 1:4 10:13 12:15 22:25<-- 24:27<--- 26:29
b) 2:5 3:6 14:17 16:19 --->25:28 --->27:30 32:35
These numbers repeat are they ment too ??? ?
King,
do you use the numbers on which you play on to track next bet?
I mean, do you play countinually if last two progression numbers belong to same group?
Thank for share this system
Ice
A few quick answers to a few questions , cps I think splits methods are doomed on double 0 wheels , same as many other systems get hammered by double 0. Two cat remove it off here if you think the method is no good. Cool paddy raved about this method now he says it does not work only by mods so take this system post off please. Same as his super splits rave reviews to start with then he mods it.
Kingspin,
Let's put the record straight. I posted the ABC splits system over a year ago on the roulette forum. It was tested extensively and developed further by myself, Crillev, CPS10, Mattymat and other members of that forum . The post title is "Simple as ABC" and is still viewable for anyone interested, there is lots of test and play data available on that post along with knowledgeable comment. There is an equally strong alternative set of splits for the 00 wheel created and tested extensively by CPS10. There are also excel spreadsheets created by Crillev and Mattymat for testing and playing purposes.
You have no test data, scant knowledge of the system and have misled the members here. If you must rip off other peoples work at least do it better than this pathetic copy.
CP
Power winner splits cost me a small fortune. We gotta have tests run.
Perhaps we can have some feedback from people who are actually successfully using this reinvented system. Seems like many roulette enthusiasts have too much time on their hands going on the repetitive tripe encountered here, with apologies to the sheep fraternity!
make room in the pit
Hi Proofreader,
There have been lots of tests run and excel spreadsheets designed for automatic testing. The poor copy posted here gives Crillevs variation, the original post advised waiting for 3 consecutive hits, there is also the option of playing a combination of both - this would be my preference.
The ABC splits died out due to lack of consistency. There are profitable runs and some not so profitable, overall not strong enough. Maybe there is scope to test and improve it, not with hard cash!
I personally do not play these splits anymore and would not recommend them now. The original post was a theory on a bet selection/strategy which had shown merit in test and play, it was a work in progress posted for discussion and development. This is a very misleading post and this is the last time I will visit it. If you need honest and knowledgeable comment and data check my earlier reply.
Best regards
Hail Coolpaddy!!!!!!!Nothing but nothing pisses me off more than Plagiarism. To Kingspin I say thumbs down. Please render your apology.
Yes well said Cooldaddy. Your paragraph applies to all bet selections which rely on money management, progressions and other maskers of flaws to simulate possibilities of merit. I guess if searching for these adds meaning to your life then go for it but the road is long with the inevitable dead end. You may as well use the most illogical simple method at roulette because it will lead down the same road and requires no elaborate testing.
Davo wrote
I guess if searching for these adds meaning to your life.......
You know, it actually does!! Believe it or don't!
"Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a heaven for?" Robert Browing
Sam
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on September 28, 2008, 11:36:57 PM
Power winner splits cost me a small fortune. We gotta have tests run.
This method is not the simple as abc this is played different to simple as ABC . Ok the numbers are the same but the method is different. Anyone who reads your simple as abc will see the difference. My method is if your group misses you spin 5 times without betting then re track . This works better in my tests that i tried.
Kingspin,
Try a little honesty for a change. I have copied part of reply 37 from Bobbybobby's TJunction post just a week ago. These are your words
Your siMple as ABC system that you trumpet on the well known "the other forum" is actually very good, I win money on that system so I state my honest opinion , that I find your simple as ABC method is good . Infact I think it very good.
CP
And the above quote was why I asked for it in the next post!!
Sam
Fancy applying such a profound quote from Robert Browning to the seedy, greedy world of casino gambling. I wonder if he would have spent hour upon hour mindlesssly pursuing roulette patterns and stop-loss rules. Would we still have the benefit of his way with words?
Quote from: iceberg1912 on September 28, 2008, 05:13:25 PM
King,
do you use the numbers on which you play on to track next bet?
I mean, do you play countinually if last two progression numbers belong to same group?
Thank for share this system
Ice
Yes i would do that ice , if say you was betting on Group A and and it missed A & hit say C twice i would bet on C.
what about if 3 was a repeater, which is group A and B...?