Hy guys i want 11 guys to help me make a system wich normaly should bring us some edge
Here is the ideea wich came from bjb007 program Numbers after Numbers Vr.01 ,i want to make a system
where i need 11 guys +me 12 ,to check every one a set of total 300.000 spins a half from nolinks://nolinks.spielbank-wiesbaden.de/ (nolinks://nolinks.spielbank-wiesbaden.de/) and the other from spielbank hamburg surley we will need another program from bjb007, Inverter
With the help of bjb007 program Numbers after Numbers Vr.01, we will take 9 the numbers that hit the most
after a number in the total 3.600.000 spins and the columns that hit the most after that particulary number
I say the 9 numbers for flat betting and the columns for proggresion
What i will need from each person is to make 20 txt files wich should contain each like 15.000 spins and save give with your ma like this 1"your name".txt ,2"your name".txt and so one
So here i want that who is interested to help to post in this topic
Sorry for my bad english
Hi mido1,
I asked bjb007 to write that program (nrs after nrs) to test some ideas I had. Can you explain more clearly what it is that you want the 11 forum members to do?
regards
metalrat
Quote from: metalrat on November 25, 2008, 08:49:48 AM
Hi mido1,
I asked bjb007 to write that program (nrs after nrs) to test some ideas I had. Can you explain more clearly what it is that you want the 11 forum members to do?
regards
metalrat
hy metalrat what i wanted to do it is was to work with 3.600.000 spins and to find for each number from 0-36 wich group of 9 numbers comes after this with were the most hits
Ok
What sort of data are you intending to work with. RNG or live spins?
Hi mido1,
I'm not sure I understand what you are going to do...
But I think you want to be able to say that
"After #12 the 9 most common hitters were # 2, 5, 9, 12, 13, 17, 21, 31 and 33"
For every number 0 - 36...
If that's the case I think you have to think another round:
Only looking for the ONE most common number will give you 37 x 37 = 1369 groups
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having a hitter 0 - 36)
This means that you will have like 2630 hits in each group in average, using 3.6M spins.
That's not a bad number. But not really good either.
Only looking for the TWO most common hitters will give you 37 x 37 x 36 = 49,284 groups
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having 37 hitters AND one DIFFERENT)
This means that you will have like 73 hits in each group in average. That's not a good number.
Only looking for the THREE most common hitters will give you 37 x 37 x 36 x 35 = 1,724,940 groups.
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having 37 hitters AND one different AND one different to BOTH)
This means that you will have like TWO HITS in each group in average.
That's a very low number. In my opinion it's useless.
But then again; I'm not sure of what you're trying to do, really.
Best regards,
KFS
Quote from: Kon-Fu-Sed on November 27, 2008, 08:27:36 AM
Hi mido1,
I'm not sure I understand what you are going to do...
But I think you want to be able to say that
"After #12 the 9 most common hitters were # 2, 5, 9, 12, 13, 17, 21, 31 and 33"
For every number 0 - 36...
If that's the case I think you have to think another round:
Only looking for the ONE most common number will give you 37 x 37 = 1369 groups
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having a hitter 0 - 36)
This means that you will have like 2630 hits in each group in average, using 3.6M spins.
That's not a bad number. But not really good either.
Only looking for the TWO most common hitters will give you 37 x 37 x 36 = 49,284 groups
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having 37 hitters AND one DIFFERENT)
This means that you will have like 73 hits in each group in average. That's not a good number.
Only looking for the THREE most common hitters will give you 37 x 37 x 36 x 35 = 1,724,940 groups.
(37 groups 0 - 36, each having 37 hitters AND one different AND one different to BOTH)
This means that you will have like TWO HITS in each group in average.
That's a very low number. In my opinion it's useless.
But then again; I'm not sure of what you're trying to do, really.
Best regards,
KFS
Thanks well this is what i had in mind,you really have brains
Quote from: metalrat on November 27, 2008, 08:00:11 AM
Ok
What sort of data are you intending to work with. RNG or live spins?
live spins