VLS Roulette Forum

Main => Full Roulette Systems => Topic started by: AnandMajumdar on December 06, 2008, 06:13:40 AM

Title: New system
Post by: AnandMajumdar on December 06, 2008, 06:13:40 AM
Hi all,

have been thinking of this for a while and dunno how this would work or if it has been tried before.. but here it goes.. pls do provide criticism or test it if possible

start of with straight ups on 1-6
1
2
3
4
5
6

no hit. bet..

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

no hit. bet..

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

no hit. bet..

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

hit. 3. bet..

1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

no hit. bet

1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

no hit. bet..

1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

hit. 8. bet

1
2
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13

and so it continues.. when does one bet on 3 or 8 again..
when we pass 36 , we come back to 1

her we have two options

if the straight up chip is still there on 1 (it has not hit in the last 36 spins) we could either

1. pass it and move to the first "hole" and fill it up or
2. put chips again on all numbers sequentially..which would mean that 1 and 2 would have 2 chips each and 3 would now have 1 chip


this is broadly how we could think of progressing in this system

any opinions ?


love
andy
Title: Re: New system
Post by: JHM on December 06, 2008, 07:15:26 AM
Andy,

When the wheel is hitting 19-36 in a streak. Than you'll lose a lot with this

6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 16 + 17 + 18 + = 156  :)

Thank you for sharing your idea, but I think it will fail.

Maybe better would be.

Pick last 6 numbers spun, and add every new number spun. We know that numbers repeat more often than they should.
Title: Re: New system
Post by: AnandMajumdar on December 06, 2008, 07:23:13 AM
true that initially one would lose.. but as more numbers keep getting covered there will be many sweet successive hits i feel.. i have a feeling that this has some merit of all the systems i have thought of..

maybe the bet selection can be line based
like

1
7
13
19
25
31

no win. bet

1
7
13
19
25
31
2

no win bet

1
7
13
19
25
31
2
8

and so on.. ?
Title: Re: New system
Post by: berlinerbruce on December 06, 2008, 07:30:51 AM
Hi again Andy ;)

been working on something similar

its called chasing the wheel

im with you on this one

All the best BerlinerBruce
Title: Re: New system
Post by: JHM on December 06, 2008, 11:06:00 AM
Andy,

Recently I have done a test with something I noticed from the ''track'' from droidman. It just track spins. But, what I noticed, track all numbers that have hit at least twice. Wait until one of those numbers hit for a third time. Than start playing the remaining numbers that have hit twice. More will follow most of the time. Off course you will have losing sessions too. But most of the times you will come up in plus.

I have attached my testing. Sessions are 50 spins per session.

(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Fimg393.imageshack.us%2Fimg393%2F348%2Fnaamloosdb8.jpg&hash=39c9dda381e405222cc5b78a53d0ab71ff97b557)

nolinks://img393.imageshack.us/img393/348/naamloosdb8.jpg (nolinks://img393.imageshack.us/img393/348/naamloosdb8.jpg)

Title: Re: New system
Post by: Jakkalsdraai on December 15, 2008, 07:08:48 AM
 ;)Hi Anand,

I was just interested to know how this system eventually performed and whether it's worth the testing.

Thanx mate
Jakk
Title: Re: New system
Post by: ryan08 on December 15, 2008, 07:23:33 AM
Quotetrue that initially one would lose.. but as more numbers keep getting covered there will be many sweet successive hits i feel.. i have a feeling that this has some merit of all the systems i have thought of..

maybe the bet selection can be line based
like

1
7
13
19
25
31

no win. bet

1
7
13
19
25
31
2

no win bet

1
7
13
19
25
31
2
8

and so on.. ?

you will begin to get more and more hits with more numbers covered but you will also win less and lose more when you hit a loss, you would be better off just playing hot nuumbers because i think this is a pretty dangerous way to play
Title: Re: New system
Post by: Marven on December 15, 2008, 04:57:50 PM
I agree with Ryan here.

cw/ac tracking and playing hot numbers would be better.

All the best,
Marven