VLS Roulette Forum

Main => Roulette & Gambling framework => Topic started by: ikarianman on February 11, 2009, 08:10:57 AM

Poll
Question: by using any technic you believe it works for  finding it
Option 1: YES votes: 27
Option 2: NO votes: 14
Title: do you believe a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: ikarianman on February 11, 2009, 08:10:57 AM
whether it is maths,or physics involved.
Title: Re: is there a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: Rudy on February 11, 2009, 12:59:10 PM
I've voted no, but I'll still try and prove myself wrong.
Title: Re: is there a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: iboba on February 11, 2009, 01:27:23 PM
????????
Title: Re: is there a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: VLSroulette on February 11, 2009, 03:51:24 PM
Quote from: ikarianman on February 11, 2009, 08:10:57 AM
whether it is maths,or physics involved.

We need to define if it is a fixed bet (i.e. combination of layout or disk-based locations which magically win time after time, beating the house edge) or is it a situational bet (approaching the game according to what is going on and act accordingly).

If it is a fixed bet, then I have to say no.
If it is approached as a situational bet, then I have to say: PERHAPHS, as it is a reality not every punter will experience the same stream of numbers, so there will be some people losing more than others (and winning more than others), but as long as the "belly" of results ressembles gaussian distribution for such a bet one could say it is a winning one, shall the player be one of those who synchronize right with it.

Regards,
Victor
Title: Re: do you believe a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: Steve on March 23, 2009, 01:33:43 AM
Hi Victor

I have to vote yes because I'm living it right now!

Kind regards
Steve
Title: Re: do you believe a consistent winning bet exists for real?(poll)
Post by: Jakkalsdraai on May 20, 2009, 03:25:14 PM
Hi Victor,

I have to vote no because I'm not living it right now.

Kind regards
Jakk   ;D