Preface: There are those that argue that the dozens or rows can give the player the advantage, provided a good staking plan and money management. There are those like Steve H. of RouletteForum that prefer wheel order sectors.
This system marries both ideas in which you are playing four sets of three wheel number sectors, like a variation of the 1st dozen, with even distribution around the wheel.
------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the three bettings groups:
A: 32,15,19...6,27,13...5,24,16...22,18,29
B: 4,21,2...36,11,30...33,1,20...7,28,12
C: 25,17,34...8,23,10...14,31,9...35,3,26
------------------------------------------------------------
Procedure:
Track A,B,C for 12 spins. You will bet on the group with the greatest number of hits.
Fibonicci: flat betting, up as you win with reverse martingale: 1122335566 (consecutive wins only, otherwise flat-bet 1x)
Premise is with the most active sector no negative progression is needed.
End session after five consecutive misses or track 12 new sector groups.
Bet 0 or 00 only if recently hit in 12 number tracking.
----------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------
Test #1: Dublinbet Wheel 1, 11:30 CST USA March 5, 2009: Starting Balance $1095
A: Group Numbers: 32,15,19,6,27,13,5,24,16,22,18,29
L L 18 L 22 L 5 18 L L 29 L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=5
B: Group Numbers: 4,21,2,36,11,30,33,1,20,7,28,12
L 36 L 7 L 30 L L 1 21 L 7
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=6
C: Group Numbers: 25,17,34,8,23,10,14,31,9,35,3,26
3 L L L L L L L L L L L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=1
-----------------------------------------------------
Most Dominant: B--Bet on all 12 for 5 spins--flat betting, up as you win 1122335566 (consecutive wins only)
1. 20 (win)
2. 16 (x)
3. 9 (x)
4. 20 (win)
5. 26 (x)------End session: Ending bankroll=$1101
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Test #2: Dublinbet Roulette #1: 3:15am March 6, 2009: Starting Bankroll=$1101.00
(Note: In this exercise I used the last six spun numbers from the marquee and waited for each number afterward until I had all 12 numbers)
Group A: 32,15,19,6,27,13,5,24,16,22,18,29
L L L 15 L L 22 13 L 24 L L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=4
Group B: 4,21,2,36,11,30,33,1,20,7,28,12
L 30 30 L L 28 L L 21 L 12 4
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=6
Group C: 25,17,34,8,23,10,14,31,9,35,3,26
35 L L L 25 L L L L L L L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=2
Most Dominant: B
Bet on all 12 flat betting for five spins: (Note: I forgot to "up as you win" as the wins were consecutive)
1. 36 (win)
2. 1 (win)
3. 33 (win)
4. 4 (win)
5. 6 (x)
End Session: Ending Bankroll=$1143.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Test #3: All Slots (Riverbelle Microgaming Feed) 4:30am: March 6, 2009: Starting Bankroll: $49.01
Group A: 32,15,19,6,27,13,5,24,16,22,18,29
L 16 L L L L L L L L L L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=1
Group B: 4,21,2,36,11,30,33,1,20,7,28,12
L L L 1 L 21 L L 30 L 36 36
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=5
(Note: This sector turned out to be the most dominant
Wach out when you have a slim majority between sectors
The sector with the last hits is the dominant one)
Group C: 25,17,34,8,23,10,14,31,9,35,3,26
25 L 25 L 17 L 34 25 L 9 L L
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12: Spins---Wins=6
-------------------------------------------------------------
Most Dominant: C (see note above)
Bet on all 12 flat betting for five spins:
1. 10 (win)
2. 27 (x)
3. 33 (x)
4. 20 (x)
5. 36 (x)
End Session: Ending Bankroll=$37.01
Interesting system not sure the progression is a good thing due to not many repeaters but played 123 spins and it did alright,sometimes went past 600, think I will play the same numbers just flatbet to compair.
Here were the results of that session starting with a 500 bankroll:
Starting br +500
abbcbacbac (= b)
============
bet b,
acccbbbcbaab (= b)
llllnolinkslwllwl = +548
============
bet b,
acaaccaccbaa (= a)
lllll = +488
============
bet a,
c0bacccbccaa (= c)
lllwlllll = +416
============
bet c,
ccccbbcbaca (= c)
nolinkswllwllwl = +536
============
bet c,
bccbacacbabb (= b)
lwwllwlwllll +524
============
bet b,
cbaaccbccabc (= c)
lwllllwlllwl = +488
============
bet c,
baacaa0caccc... (a/c draw)
lllwlllwlnolinks = +548
============
...cont baacaa0caccc..bbc (= c)
bet c,
cbbaccabacbb (= b)
wlllwwlllwll = +536
============
bet b,
bbcbbacbabcc
wwlwwllwlwll
End br +584
Rqeust
Tried it just flat bet and ended the same br.. was lagging 12u's most of the way though.
QuoteFibonacci: flat betting, up as you win with reverse martingale: 1122335566 (consecutive wins only, otherwise flat-bet 1x)
Hello dear Proof,
I see the pattern of two times the element from the fibonacci sequence, so I'm pretty much guessing it is 11223355
88As this is the next fibonacci number:
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number (nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number)
Thanks for sharing the system mate. Really appreciated.
Your friend,
Victor
Quote from: VLSroulette on March 07, 2009, 01:18:37 PM
Hello dear Proof,
I see the pattern of two times the element from the fibonacci sequence, so I'm pretty much guessing it is 1122335588
As this is the next fibonacci number:
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number (nolinks://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibonacci_number)
Thanks for sharing the system mate. Really appreciated.
Your friend,
Victor
Hi Victor :)
I just want to say Hi, and Thanks for running such a successful web site. Don't know if you seen the bs going on @ Steve's forum, but its just ridicules. Good to see people here can speak English and are intelligent.
RE this system:
Looks interesting, I will take a closer look and see if I can get it coded for RX