First, thank you Tole for posting this statistic. :thumbsup:
Let me explain how these values could be valid (yes, 100% values are right!).
Somebody runs a simulator over a large amount of spins.
He computes over the totals how much % of times it goes after X amount of spins
ON THIS ANALYZED SAMPLE.
100% means:
At analyzed sample, we could observe 100% of the time the number has hit within a range of 368 spins.Those are custom-sample statistics and yes, it is correct to express it that way.
Remember, at "overall statistics" say the increased indetermined spin-lenght of infinity, there is never 100% certainty. It goes like 99.999999..... but never really 100%, this value is only right under these custom sampling cases.
Quotecan systems be based on this statistic?
Yes, they can, and they have been. But overall, as sample lenght increases, so does deviations from the norm; therefore we do see samples going beyond 15 even chances and so on.
Better than trying to overcome Maximum sample deviations with an "all or nothing" progression, is to analyze the stream's flow and try to synch with it, using a mild money management (i.e. always avoid the 1-hit-gets-all approach). That is a better approach, and yes, shall you "spontaneously" witness an event approaching these values on your sessions, it might be okay to risk a certain amount of units on it, but you have to learn to "let go" past that point.
A better approach is the "waker" approach, where you try to make compensation after an extreme deviation gain you 1 unit/hit.
Regards.
Victor