This is not the discussion of a system, but the a discussion about whether or not 32,000 spins to win 500 is too much. I know at first this seems like it would be all too easy to answer "yes, that's not only impractical but insane."
Let me elaborate. 32,000 spins is a lot of spins. So the answer to playing this in a B&M casino, is absolutely no way. But what if it were done with a roulette bot? I am now as I type this at 37,000 spins (still at a 500 unit profit) and never had a drawdown of more than 290 units.
So basically my question is "is an absolutely insane amount of spins too many spins too make only 500 units if you had a bot doing it for you while you were away."
To finish, I am now at 40,000 spins and have a 535 unit profit. Max drawdown is still the same.
Let me know.
Yes that is a lot of spins for the current profit.
It looks like the method is teetering on the edge of an abyss so deep, that if it falls in, well you know the rest...
What is the profit on turnover (POT) percentage? That is what will tell you if a bot would be worth it.
I don't think you should even bother with any method that returns too little for the money outlayed regardless of spin count.
If in the long run you can secure 14% on you outlayed money on the stock exchange, etc, then you are doing very well indeed. If you can match or better that playing roulette, then you can make some decent money. Much less than that, and you start moving toward that deep abyss from which there is no return.
Check your POT.