Do you think is any good to play 10 chips on High and 5 chips on low
just to reduce the loss if you loose.
When I first began to play roulette,
differential betting seemed so absurd to me,
but it's some times that I am having second thoughts.
So you lose 5 when low hits, gain 5 when high hits and lose 15 when zero hits? This is exactly the same as betting 5 on one of the ECs, except you LOSE more when zero hits....
Ye, I used to think that way too.
But I dont know why lately this differential is intriguing me.
With some elaborations maybe....
Hello,
Vito...
I can not see what is intriguing... And I do not know how to elaborate better than to show.
So I show you like this:
The "normal" way:
You bet 5 units on Black
You bet 2 units on Red
Your total bet is 7 units.
If Black wins you get 10 units back (5 + 5). Your net is 10 - 7 = +3 units.
If Red wins you get 4 units back (2 + 2). Your net is 4 - 7 = -3 units.
If Zero wins you get nothing back. Your net is 0 - 7 = -7 units.
OK?
The differential way:
You calculate: 5 (Black) - 2 (Red) = 3 (Black because it was the higher amount)
You bet 3 units on Black.
Your total bet is 3 units.
If Black wins you get 6 units back (3 + 3). Your net is 6 - 3 = +3 units. That is exactly the same.
If Red wins you get nothing back. Your net is 0 - 3 = -3 units. That is exactly the same.
Now: If Zero wins you get nothing back. Your net is 0 - 3 = -3 units.
The normal way you lost 7 units but this way you lost 3.
Every time the Zero wins you SAVE.
All other times the net is exactly the same.
So why not use it?
Best regards,
Homeito Bemek
...AND you use less units when you bet differential.
That is also a good thing.
HB
Yes, I see Homeito
The fact is that I am using a terribly chaotic system lately
betting numbers with the idea to give much credit to the
repeaters without forgetting the others and it's going fine.
And I think that this system got somethin from this
differential way of playing since you attack all the wheel.
Thanks for yr answer