I have found a patern that is on the table.
i did 30 tests of 100 spins
all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips
is this meen that i have found the winning bet???? :shout:
charles if u want sent me email
there is no win3million bet, that bet never existed
but it is good if you found someting that may bring you profit
Another HG viper? :)
Quote from: viper5 on May 24, 2009, 03:06:17 PM
I have found a patern that is on the table.
What do you mean by "pattern"?
It's very obvious there are patterns in the way the table layout is designed. The question is whether or not it can be taken advantage of.
Also, did you use flat betting?
Did you bet on every spin?
How many units per bet on average?
Quote from: viper5 on May 24, 2009, 03:06:17 PM
I did 30 tests of 100 spins
all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips
is this meen that I have found the winning bet???? :shout:
Not necessarily. It only means your bet is probably worth conducting a real test on (an extensive one). I have once tested the G.U.T. mechanically over 5000 spins and came up with more profit than that. It doesn't mean the system won in the long run (at least when played mechanically).
Be scientific and don't rush to conclusions.
Your friend,
Marven
Quote from: viper5 on May 24, 2009, 03:06:17 PM
I have found a patern that is on the table.
I did 30 tests of 100 spins
all won average 17 chips
1 won 2 chips
is this meen that I have found the winning bet???? :shout:
charles if u want sent me email
Ok, I'll say to you what I say to everyone that claims this. If you have it, post it or PM it to someone you trust and have them post a simple YES or NO. Viper, please don't be offended, I respect you and the systems you have created and I think you are a great roulette player. You can see why I am skeptical, though.
Best Regards,
Chris
it is not based on a patern on the table lay out(like reds and colums anomalies)
I bet on every spin and 0 is a loss
I did the tests from dbet and wesbian spins
Charles was right....anly with real spins u can win(rng isnt the right one)
the system is based on nums sequence
Rpro THANK U soooo much!
I'm getting tired of peopele finding stuff and telling everyone about it, but dont share....
Their answer: "Why should we?"
My answer: Then please don't tell. For what its worth, you're only upsetting other forum members, and for what cause?
hehehehe @ Ka2,
agreed! Come on Viper spit it out mate! ......or did it fail
Cheers
Jakk
Quote from: Marven on May 24, 2009, 03:25:44 PM
Another HG viper? :)
What do you mean by "pattern"?
It's very obvious there are patterns in the way the table layout is designed. The question is whether or not it can be taken advantage of.
Also, did you use flat betting?
Did you bet on every spin?
How many units per bet on average?
Not necessarily. It only means your bet is probably worth conducting a real test on (an extensive one). I have once tested the G.U.T. mechanically over 5000 spins and came up with more profit than that. It doesn't mean the system won in the long run (at least when played mechanically).
Be scientific and don't rush to conclusions.
Your friend,
Marven
Here, here.
I vote for Marven......... what, we're not voting?......... Doesn't matter, I still vote for Marven!