Every set of tracked spins results in a betting opportunity. No tracking of millions of spins here. Also, it is a flat betting method which is nice. I have only tested it over 3,400 spins so far, but it has produced a positive result thus far. I'd love any suggestions from you guys to improve upon it.
Track 37 spins of the wheel. When you hit spin 37, count how many un-hit numbers there are. Spin the wheel again. If the number of un-hit numbers has not gone down, add 1 (mental note) to "number of spins waited".
Spin again, if no un-hit number has hit (the number of un-hit numbers has not gone down), add 1 to "number of spins waited" again.
Do this until "number of spins waited" has hit 5. Once you have hit 5 continue to spin the wheel. You're almost ready to bet.
Now, what you're waiting for is for the "number of un-hit numbers count" to drop. In other words, you're waiting for one of the un-hit numbers to hit.
Then, you just bet on all of the un-hit numbers for 2 spins (flat betting). Then, repeat the whole process with a newly tracked set of 37 spins.
So, to recap:
Track 37 spins of the wheel.
Continue spinning (only tracking the last 37 spins available to you...do not add more) until you've spun 5 consecutive times without an un-hit number hitting.
Then, continue spinning until an un-hit number does hit. Once that happens, you bet on all the un-hit numbers for 2 spins. Win or lose you start the whole process over.
I've included a picture of the BR balance trend and betting history below.
[attachimg=#]
Here is a continuation of the same graph at almost 8,500 spins (and the betting history is attached again).
Again at just over 11,000 spins...with betting history. Just to make this clear, I'm sure that this is going to fail at some point. But, this gives you an idea of how well it would go if you chose to use this as a "hit and run" type system. Make a few bucks and run.
At 27,000 spins. BR Balance Graph and Summary Screen. You'll see it went kind of "choppy" there for a looonnngggg time. As most systems tend to...but, at least it didn't abruptly tank.
Great to see you developing a flat bet system! Hope the test continues to go positive for you :clapping:
what if an unhit number hits, say on spin 39?
Then you re-track the previous 37 spins and start from the beginning.
Quote from: rjeaton1 on July 12, 2009, 10:44:52 PM
Then you re-track the previous 37 spins and start from the beginning.
retrack 37 new numbers?
No, the previous 37 numbers that came out.
That first graph looks like the skyline of a big city.
Quote from: TwoCatSam on July 13, 2009, 12:30:21 AM
That first graph looks like the skyline of a big city.
Las Vegas?
hi rejaton,
I invented this betselection called RNF years ago as a part of my way to GUT.
I also found a way to select the once-hitters or the favourites to bet.
br
winkel
Rjeaton,
Are you doing your tests on RNG numbers?
Keep up the good work :good:
Vix
Quote from: vix on July 13, 2009, 03:25:58 PM
Rjeaton,
Are you doing your tests on RNG numbers?
Keep up the good work :good:
Vix
This particular test was done using the numbers RXtreme generated...so yes, RNG.
Hoper35
I was thinking New York City.
Sam
Hello forumers.
I do run a test with "real" spins from Hamburg.
Table#2
January 2004
8211 spins.
The trigger loadss 298 times, so more or less once each 28 spins.
But sometimes we have to wait more than 100 spins to have a trigger.
The mean betting amount it's over 13 numbers.
I registered a net loss of -382 units, playing strictely has it was stated and published.
So we lose more than 1 unit x attack.
The max number of attacks with negative results were 6 in a row.
To keep track of the system in a waiting day could be a burden and a bored time.
In a B&M casino you must to erase one number each spin, count the unhits, make the calculations, and if so, choose the selection, bet over... just to bet over a 13#'s selection.
I have run tests with better results, much more action in every spin and and "easy does it" selection 12+1 or 6+6+1, or 6+3+3+1, or 3+3+3+3+1, over the layout.
But, anyway... much better results means close to -2,7% of the total invested money, not because the "0", it's just because the 35-1 payout.
RNG give just as bad results as hamburg spins, so maybe you just sent us a postcard from Singapore or another far east skyline... :agree:
Best grettings from downtown...
Betatester
Do you have any update on this rjeaton1? I am very much interested in the progress of this.