Heyo.. So I've been thinking about this system covering 35 numbers on a no zero table, leaving the last to show uncovered every time, alternately ONLY covering the last to show.. Thoughts on statistics? Probably will even out over time? I've tested it briefly both ways, there certainly are times where there are a LOT of consecutive one number repeats of at least one time, but can this be quantified statistically outside of showing up 1/36 spins? I mean do repeats have their own set of statistics that truly vary from a 1/36 (no zero) chance or will that always even out? I think I already know the answer to this but I still feel it could be playable ;D Again considering I'm using a non-zero penny table.. doesn't mean the wins are gonna be "easy" :pleasantry: but.. :haha:
- Matty B
play with 100 dollar chips. 3.500. a spin win a hundred. or lose 3,500. play the number you leave out.
If u look for a hit and run method maybe you could cover the layout with only one number left and then wait until there is only one number left wish has not hit - then you have 1 in 37 but is so expensive and dont know if it can be done.
There is one way to cover the tabel and gain +1 unit - but is around tabel limitis wish is no good at all.
The best option for a roulette system player wish would like to play that way is to cover the layout with only one number left and be abel to increase the bets with at least 3 levels - i dont belive it can be done.
That would be that when 36 numbers are hit you cover them all and the un-hit sleeping number has at that exact momentum hit three times in a row - i assume that would maybe happen only once in a life time if at all.
Cheers
Thanks for the replies guys :) I felt like an idiot though after I posted this because i thought about it and checked on RX, of course repeating singles follow probabilities, every level of repeat beyond one happens approx 36 times less then the previous level. I got confused because i was also thinking of repeats that occur non consecutively, but maybe they follow similar probabilities, would make sense. I would bet though one could use a slow raising stake on losses and follow just the last number to catch repeats.
RNG's are rigged - you will never beat the Casinos. . . . . . . . .