This is the results of 151 sessions.
Around 3000 spins from Wiesbaden tested and really played, SD of 1.05, total profit : +770
Highest bet 6 units and it happened once. Average quantity of numbers played 1.68.
14, 10, 23, 13, 9, 29, 10, 1, 22, 22, -80, 4, -105, 29, 31, -16, 23, 31, 28, 10, -49, -81, 0, 34, 22, 22, 32, 29, 4, 23, -57, 34, 9, 34, 29, -5, 31, 19, 29, 14, 6, 9, -57, 27, 16, 27, -55, 12, -52, 10, 21, 21, -51, 0, 9, 14, 6, 29, 7, -14, 3, 26, 28, 7, 3, -40, 19, 20, -35, 9, 34, 25, 20, 28, 6, -15, -64, 28, 35, 19, 3, 9, 11, 30, -10, 34, 17, 11, 27, -81, 20, 9, 5, -35, 6, 9, 10, 4, 2, 13, 29, 14, 2, -6, 19, 7, -52, 15, 25, 32, 21, -50, -20, -44, 6, 14, -2, 16, 31, 21, -55, 20, 15, -41, 0, 33, 26, -56, 35, 20, 31, -2, 6, 14, 15, 23, 32, 0, 21, 13, -44, 3, 7, 24, 25, 29, 0, 26, -39, 13, -18
Is it good ?
Quote
total profit : +770
Is it good ?
If it profits consistently = OH YEAH! [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]
I'm glad it recoups. There are some minuses ( - ), but the big picture is what really counts in gambling.
Kudos for this one Arte.
Would you like to look at it more deeply or it does not matter as it takes so much time to write my convulated explanations. [smiley=lolk.gif]
What is the new trick? Arte
Hermes
It would take more than one person to motivate me to write more details. The reason i ask is because i have the feeling no one is really interested specially after my passage on G.G.
I don't know if I did something wrong but I tested your system for repeats - that one where you wait for 5 numbers and I lost more than won. Is it that one you mention here?
Hermes
No
QuoteIs it that one you mention here?
Arte, I like the waker methodology systems like the one you exposed before.
I observed that phenomenon and it is usually a fine event.
In fact, one of the things I thought long time ago was to "look backwards" on what happened with a number before becoming "hot", and although some were crazily hot
out of nowhere, some others were steadily compensating for previous "coldness" as you say.
QuoteI have the feeling no one is really interested specially after my passage on G.G.
I doubt Gamblers' Glen has any influence on the regulars around. In fact, rarely the readers of our forum comment or say anything about GG. So in my opinion you shouldn't care about what happened
there dear friend, it is
here where we are that counts!
Let's use this environment! I like it better :)
Best regards.
Your mate,
Victor.
Hey Arte,
I for one LOVE your methods. I sometimes have a hard time wrapping my thick skull around them, but I'll make sure to ask more questions in the future to let you know your work is appriciated!
Keep 'em coming!
Cheers,
Matt
Here is a demo of this new method. Source of spins : Wiesbaden - table 2 January 30, 2008
The same picture but outside the image frame below:
nolinks://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/11/75/07/03/dynami11.gif
A sector is 9 spins large. You select the sector to play if it did not hit during the last 4 spins.
(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Fi34.servimg.com%2Fu%2Ff34%2F11%2F75%2F07%2F03%2Fdynami11.gif&hash=a31e2d48753402ef7a4eadfcb17404d11d3747cf)
Here is a more complete demo :
Notice that each number played has been selected because it comes from a sector which did not hit on the last 4 spins.
Outside the image frame :
nolinks://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/11/75/07/03/dynami12.gif
(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Fi34.servimg.com%2Fu%2Ff34%2F11%2F75%2F07%2F03%2Fdynami12.gif&hash=2e8c22c865ea4871fb1681c9f6dd0a042a6d2ba5)
That's different what I tested. Sector is last 9 spins? Is it enough to pick up just one number from 9 which didn't show up for 4 spins?
If you don't catch the number later you have to bet all 9? Or I don't understand.
Hermes
Hermes do you see why i hate describing a new system because even though it is a simple idea it is always difficult to pass the knowledge.
When a number hit i place a string of numbers where number 5 (middle point) falls in line with the last number spun:
1 2 3 4 [5] 4 3 2 1
This help me split the wheel in a set of different dynamic sectors. Contrarily to the table layout with its fixed sectors using dynamic sectors gives me some more opportunities and is more precise. To understand this ascertion you would need to practice a lillte bit but since i use this concept my methods have improved. The reason i can say without doubts they have improved is because i monitor the standard deviation when i test them.
You know Arte everything is clear for that one who created the system, I know it from own experience but difficult to explain to others in English. What you try to do is called liquid sectors because the sectors are for every new game different, what is flexible idea.
Thanks for the explanation.
Hermes
Hello all, I am new to the board and am blown away by the free flow of ideas.
@Arte, I like this system, i was wondering, do you use a progression at all with it or just flat bet? Obviously I mean probably a very light progression....
Just wondering [smiley=dankk2.gif]
Hey Big Slick,
Welcome aboard!
[smiley=4/cheers.gif]
Hi all,
I'm new user, and I'm interested in the system explained in this section, but I really does not understand how to play it.
Why Arte, in the second picture did you play #10 ?
Thank you .
BR
Pascal
Thanx Arte. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
Your posts are very much appreciated. Took me a while to understand your system, but I'm up to speed now. Will now practice it a bit and then give it a go this weekend.
Definately something new to me and I do like it...it's veeeeeeeeeerrryyyy nice!
Cheers Mate! [smiley=beer.gif]
Jakkalsdraai [smiley=dankk2.gif]
Hey Arte,
If I may I'll try and explain to Pascal. Unfortunately english is my second language as well, so if I get it wrong I'm sorry.
Ok Pascal the reason Arte plays the number 10 is because you'll see when the 10 was spun he puts 9 numbers as a sector with the 10 in the middle and 4 numbers to the left and four numbers to the right. Now this specific sector hasn't hit or overlap in any of the previous four spins, so 10 is ready to be played. He does the same with the other numbers.
So if a number is spun place the 9 number sector (123454321) with the 5 on the number spun. Remember that the numbers (123454321) is only basically to determine that the number previously spun falls on the 5 and the other numbers are 4 numbers left and four numbers right. These numbers (123454321)haven't any value and efectively could of been (abcdedcba)
So if you write down a sector following the above rules and nothing had hit within this sector in the previous 4 spins you will play this number.
Any additional numbers obtained from going through the same steps above are added. So as you could see in his example he had 3 numbers when he got a hit.
I hope that I have helped you Pascal, and Arte I hope my explanation meets your approval Arte. Again I think that this looks like a very, very nice system. Thanx again and I hope you don't find me to arrogant to try and explain your system.
Kind regards
Cheers [smiley=beer.gif]
Jakkalsdraai
QuoteHi all,
I'm new user...
Pascal
Welcome Pascal!!! [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]
Very...very interesting Arte. In the string 28-15-20-14... the number 14, don´t play?. Why?
Un saludo cordial, Edgardo.
Hey Arte,
I've finally gotten a good handle on this system and it's very impressive so far. Question though - have you tried betting on the section (or part of the section) instead of just one number? I haven't tested much yet, but results are good.
Thanks for the ideas!
Matt
Thank you jakkal!
and thank you VLS for your welcome!
QuoteUnfortunately english is my second language as well, so if I get it wrong I'm sorry. Quote
For me is the same, so please be patient... :D
Thank you again
Pascal
No problem Pascal. [smiley=thumbsup.gif]
I hope you understand the system better now. It's true what Arte says, it's very difficult to explain a system even if it seems easy to one self, to actually explain it in words are always difficult.
Anyhow if you have any questions feel free to ask! How does the saying go:"If the baby doesn't cry, the baby doesn't get any milk!" [smiley=grin.gif]
Cheers Mate! [smiley=beer.gif]
Jakkalsdraai
Hey Arte,
I've been testing this idea lately and am very impressed. Do you use a progression or flat betting (sorry, I know it's already been asked, but I'm curious)? I also still don't grasp your 1:52 odds. Does anyone understand it that could help me out? I've been testing recently with a mild progression, and my latest result shows +142 after 188 spins. Highest bet was 3 chips on 3 numbers.
Cheers,
Matt
Hey Matty, you said you tested using a mild progression and I was wondering what you were using?
Thanks,
JR
System for "sleeping sector of 9" ???????
As easy as ???
If a sector of 9 "sleeps" for 28 spins the chance to win at the next spins is only 75 %.
Using it as a system ? As Einstein said: "things should be done as simple as possible but not more".
I do not think this "sleeping system" could fulfill the simplicity or long-tun winnings..
Hi Guys
Firstly welcome to Family Here At The Forum For all The New Members.
Great to see you here.
@ kacso
I am not sure how you come up with 75% For 9 number section missing 28 times Mate.
But according to John Solitude's Book page 35. (2005 edition )
He States that for a 9 number section to miss 17 times it would be 99.12% chance of hitting after that.
I am just trying to help thats all.
Your Friend
Lanky
QuoteHey Matty, you said you tested using a mild progression and I was wondering what you were using?
Thanks,
JR
Hey Big Slick,
I was simply using a progression that would always keep me in the positive on a win. So depending on how many qualified numbers I had, it could be anywhere from 1-4 units per number. I think the highest it got was 4 numbers, 4 units.
Matt