(I hope this is the proper place to post it - it's not a software, anyway)
Hi All,
Here's how to get and use a GUT-tracker for use inside Brick-and-Mortar casinos - and they will allow it. :D
The first step is simple:
Get yourself an image of the wheel. Like this one, for example:
[attachimg=#1]
yes, it's home-made :)
You will for sure find a nicer one in the casino.
You also need a pen ;)
Now, all you have to do is to place a dot beside each number as they hit. Each and every hit.
And count how many blank/un-marked numbers you have, how many with one dot, two dots etc.
Simple as that.
Here is a complete session:
Wiesbaden Table #3, 01.04.2003, from spin #181
(This is Session #10 in the Wiesbaden test file i posted as an attachement in my GUT-test thread)
Here we go:
0 - 18 - 13 - 4 - 5 - 35 - 2 - 14 - 28 - 33 - 20 - 35 - 29
At this moment, your tracker should look like this:
[attachimg=#2]
OK? Then we continue:
30 - 1 - 15 - 17 - 1 - 29 - 21 - 36 - 9 - 11
At this moment, your tracker should look like this:
[attachimg=#3]
Count:
Blank numbers: 17
Numbers with one dot: 17
A trigger, so we bet the blank numbers:
3 6 7 8 10 12 16 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32 34
Next number:
1
We lost :( , mark the number and the tracker looks like this:
[attachimg=#4]
Count:
Blank numbers: still 17
Numbers with one dot: still 17
The same trigger, so we bet the blank numbers a second time:
3 6 7 8 10 12 16 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32 34
Next number:
7
We HIT :D and although we are excited, we REMEMBER to mark the hit:
[attachimg=#5]
Next numbers:
18 - 11
[attachimg=#6]
Count:
Blank numbers: 16
Numbers with one dot: 16
A trigger, so we bet the blank numbers:
3 6 8 10 12 16 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32 34
Next number:
9
We lost :( , mark and the tracker looks like this:
[attachimg=#7]
Count:
Blank numbers: still 16
Numbers with one dot: 15
A new trigger, so we bet the blank numbers a second time:
3 6 8 10 12 16 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32 34
Next number:
9
We lost :( , mark and the tracker looks like this:
[attachimg=#8]
Blank numbers: still 16
Numbers with one dot: still 15
Still the same trigger but we bet 2 x 16u = 32u already, so we don't bet
The end in the next post...
(cont'd)
Next numbers:
34 :( - 15
[attachimg=#1]
Count:
Blank numbers: 15
Numbers with one dot: 15
A trigger, so we bet the blank numbers:
3 6 8 10 12 16 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 31 32
Next number:
12
We HIT :D and remember to mark:
[attachimg=#2]
Next numbers:
30 - 24 - 26 - 21 - 27 - 28
[attachimg=#3]
Count:
Blank numbers: 11
Numbers with MORE THAN one dot: 10
A trigger, so we bet the blank numbers:
3 6 8 10 16 19 22 23 25 31 32
Next number:
25
We HIT :D and mark:
[attachimg=#4]
Count:
Blank numbers: 10
Numbers with MORE than one dot: 10
A new trigger, so we bet the blank numbers:
3 6 8 10 16 19 22 23 31 32
Next number:
32
We HIT :D and mark:
[attachimg=#5]
As the bank-roll is at +42 this is the End of session.
Got it?
KFS
Have a fun week-end all!
KFS
i'll try it for sure
thanks
KFS
I think you're a fine feller, so don't take this wrong.
Why would you work so hard to create something which you have, ahem, hak, kaf kaf, proven not to work??
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on October 24, 2008, 11:00:39 AM
KFS
I think you're a fine feller, so don't take this wrong.
Why would you work so hard to create something which you have, ahem, hak, kaf kaf, proven not to work??
Sam
The words
Fun &
Sake come to my mind.... [smiley=2/whistle.gif]
[smiley=dankk2.gif] for the detailed post & the imgs KFS.
BTW mate, like this is exactly what I want to implement with the [DISK] tag!
Regards.
Hi guys,
@Victor:
If I understand what you say about the [DISK] tag correctly, it will show a picture of a wheel - like the above.
If it's possible to implement a disk-tag; can you please make two: [DISK0] and [DISK00]...?
;)
@TCS (and all),
Sam, first of all: The above wasn't much work. I had the image and the session so the most work was writing the instructions, actually.
I had this idea already when I wrote my JavaScript tracker as this was the way Peter visualized to me how I could do it in an array.
The only real difference is that this array is in wheel-number order...
Second: I think you're a fine feller too, Sam.
I don't think I can stop you or anyone from using winkel's method - you have to decide that yourselves.
The above was, for the bigger part, information that it's possible to use the method w/o a computer.
It MAY also show someone who thinks this is a complicated method that it isn't, really.
I just like you guys - also if you use winkel's method.
That's why I posted the above.
Third: I have neither proven winkel's method to fail nor to win.
When I began studying the method I tried to show him correct!
As I have said before: I have never studied stochastics... So how could I know...?
But now I have shown that the "clinical version" is a long-time loser, contrary to what winkel claimed in the beginning.
But when shown this, he claims that his method cannot be programmed because of the human decisions...
I have also shown that statistical studies do not show profit and winkel says so too.
But winkel also claims that his test ended positive by 163,345u.
So I asked him yesterday "Which test ended +163,345u? The one that cannot be programmed or the one that cannot show a positive result?"
(Reply #49 in my GUT-test thread)
Have a nice weekend, all!
(I will probably not be able to log-in before Monday. So you can relax until then ;))
KFS
:D
Thanks Mr. Chips!
/KFS