VLS Roulette Forum

Study Groups => Study Groups => Law of the Third => Topic started by: Silver Fox on April 30, 2009, 03:34:00 PM

Title: My take on the law
Post by: Silver Fox on April 30, 2009, 03:34:00 PM
I have been tinkering with many different systems over the years, including some based on the law of the third. here are my recent results for a "system" i am working on at the moment. I`m only posting this to give some encouragement to others who like me, think the law of the third is a real phenomenon, but the problem is working out how to use it to our advantage :)

i used DublinBet spins with a very slight progession, in fact i would barely call it that. I know 481 spins is early days, i will post more later  :thumbsup:

(https://www.vlsroulette.com/proxy.php?request=nolinks%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv321%2FAbdul_Alhazred%2FUntitled-4.jpg&hash=f6604c6c8ef99ec3f2f634ff7a7b8840266dc5eb)
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: The Spiders Kiss on April 30, 2009, 05:27:27 PM
Hi
A very interesting graph.
Cant wait to hear more
TSK
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Number Six on May 01, 2009, 09:09:14 PM
Hi Silver Fox,

It's true that using the law to create an advantage is extremely difficult, which is why many people write it off as meaningless. It is anything but. An important factor I think is sensible staking, as it is in using all systems. I find that a divisor works VERY well. I'm testing Project A at the moment and a first spin hit rate of 60% is enough to turn a profit flat betting. Applying a divisor adds a little progression and makes the time worthwhile!

Good luck with the test

6

Here is the link to Lanky's divisor plan if you're not familiar with it...of course, it is not limited to 6-points.

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/6-point-divisor-plan/

Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Silver Fox on May 01, 2009, 10:29:00 PM
thanks for the replies guys... i know the stategy is sound... the money management is the key here (my first test above was without much thought to the actual betting but it still worked), i will take a look at the divisor plan again and post more updates when i manage to find the time to test more  :)
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Natural9 on May 01, 2009, 10:45:51 PM
Quote from: Silver Fox on May 01, 2009, 10:29:00 PM
thanks for the replies guys... I know the stategy is sound... the money management is the key here (my first test above was without much thought to the actual betting but it still worked), I will take a look at the divisor plan again and post more updates when I manage to find the time to test more  :)

Looks good  are you going to post the strategy at all

Regards Rodney
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Silver Fox on May 01, 2009, 10:57:45 PM
Quote from: Natural9 on May 01, 2009, 10:45:51 PM
Looks good  are you going to post the strategy at all

Regards Rodney

hi Rodney

not while i am fine tuning it no, like i said, i am posting it because i am using the law of the third with some success (at the moment lol ) and just wanted to encourage others :)
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: winkel on May 02, 2009, 12:05:14 AM
It is a new fashion on this forum:

POSTING RESULTS teling NOTHING.

this is boring and annoying.
In some time you come up and tell us you are playing Martingale and it busted.

Have you ever thought a while about the Law of third?
Look at my Statistics and you will leanr that the Law of third only appears at about 6% of all 37spin-trots.
How will you put a winning strategy on that?

Post your system and we can help to tune it up.
Otherwise it is just wasting space ont the Internet.

???
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Herb on May 02, 2009, 12:30:03 AM
Winkel,

How about explaining why you think the Law of the Third works.

-Regards,

Herb
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Silver Fox on May 02, 2009, 06:18:46 AM
Quote from: Winkel on May 02, 2009, 12:05:14 AM
It is a new fashion on this forum:

POSTING RESULTS teling NOTHING.

this is boring and annoying.
In some time you come up and tell us you are playing Martingale and it busted.

Have you ever thought a while about the Law of third?
Look at my Statistics and you will leanr that the Law of third only appears at about 6% of all 37spin-trots.
How will you put a winning strategy on that?

Post your system and we can help to tune it up.
Otherwise it is just wasting space ont the Internet.

???

well hi Winkel, no i dont use Martingale, oh and why did you post in this section? lol
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: winkel on May 02, 2009, 06:59:06 AM
Quote from: Herb on May 02, 2009, 12:30:03 AM
Winkel,

How about explaining why you think the Law of the Third works.

-Regards,

Herb

The Law of the Third works?

What do you mean by this question?
a) Why is it appearing after a certain amount of spins?
or
b) Why do I think that it is possible to put a strategy on it?

br
winkel
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: bombus on May 02, 2009, 08:25:53 AM
Quote from: Number Six on May 01, 2009, 09:09:14 PM
Hi Silver Fox,

It's true that using the law to create an advantage is extremely difficult, which is why many people write it off as meaningless. It is anything but. An important factor I think is sensible staking, as it is in using all systems. I find that a divisor works VERY well. I'm testing Project A at the moment and a first spin hit rate of 60% is enough to turn a profit flat betting. Applying a divisor adds a little progression and makes the time worthwhile!

Good luck with the test

6

Here is the link to Lanky's divisor plan if you're not familiar with it...of course, it is not limited to 6-points.

nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/6-point-divisor-plan/




Has any one tried tu guetting progression for strategies built around tu law of tu t**d (sorry about my Irish accent)?

I reckon it shows some promise, providing your method wins at level stakes (flat betting) of course.

Link here:  nolinks://vlsroulette.com/money-management/the-guetting-progression/
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Number Six on May 02, 2009, 10:08:37 AM
Quote from: Herb
Winkel,

How about explaining why you think the Law of the Third works.

-Regards,

Herb

When was the last time you saw all 37 numbers hit consecutively? The law doesn't follow any rules, so it's key to have an arsenal of bets that can capitalise on all conditions. Even just one number repeating in the rotation is enough for an effective system to conclude an attack in that cycle of spins successfully.
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Herb on May 02, 2009, 02:34:14 PM
Winkel,

Why do you feel you can beat the game of roulette by building a strategy based on the law of the third?
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: winkel on May 02, 2009, 03:02:05 PM
Quote from: Herb on May 02, 2009, 02:34:14 PM
Winkel,

Why do you feel you can beat the game of roulette by building a strategy based on the law of the third?

It is not based on the Law of Third, I told you earlier. But as ever you only read what you wanna read, not what is wrritten
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: Herb on May 02, 2009, 03:10:38 PM
 
QuoteRe: My take on the law 

It is not based on the Law of Third, I told you earlier. But as ever you only read what you wanna read, not what is wrritten

Winkel,

I'm sure you know what I mean.  If you don't have the answer, that's fine.  :)

Regards,

Herb
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: winkel on May 02, 2009, 03:34:32 PM
Quote from: Herb on May 02, 2009, 03:10:38 PM

Winkel,

I'm sure you know what I mean.  If you don't have the answer, that's fine.  :)


Regards,

Herb

No, I really donĀ“t know what you are asking for.
Title: Re: My take on the law
Post by: bombus on May 03, 2009, 07:39:16 AM
Quote from: Herb on May 02, 2009, 02:34:14 PM
Winkel,

Why do you feel you can beat the game of roulette by building a strategy based on the law of the third?

I don't speak for Winkel, but I think the law of the third is inherently an event within an event, with ever smaller & larger events on either side. So the idea is to bet on a very brief event which will occur in the event within the event. These micro/macro events cannot but happen as long as the wheel spins around and the pill finds a pocket.

That might sound like gobbledy gook, but it does sum it up accurately.