Nothing to prove if it does not work, then don't use it. >>>

LOL! All systems work sometimes, is that your point? That makes it pretty much useless, doesn't it.

absolutely, pretty much useless

"one man's junk is another man's treasure"  It's how you view it.

Kimo Li

and my name is "Another Man"

haha.. 

Hi Kimo,

Im a grateful person so i feel compelled to give thanks for your teachings. They've proven to be very useful to my purpose of beating roulette. I must say ive made some changes regarding numbers of pies, adding more matrices just to track others variants too while chasing pies and stars. You achieved to put an order inside the wheel and that is a big improvement in comparison to what was known till you published your books.
I back you in your claim that roulette is beatable just doing the right things to win while playing.
I should add everybody should be aware there are rythms produced by the tendency the wheel is producing with the flow of the outcomes. All you need to know which are the conecting events to make this rythms noticeable.

Sincerely,
Carlos.

Quote from: Kimo Li on June 14, 2010, 11:43:14 PM
Why would you share your winning strategy?  That's what they want.  They try to make you angry and prove something works so they can win as well.  People that are that way will never win.  Ask that person to show a winning method.  He will not show you because he has none."

This is what many of the hucksters and sellers say when someone  questions or asks for evidence. It's simply an evasion. And why does providing evidence (I mean some real evidence, not just a couple of meaningless screenshots) necessarily mean you have to share the strategy? it doesn't.

Call me cynical but I'm with Noble Savage on this. It's a publicity stunt. The fact that Kimo doesn't give any methods of actually playing in his books means that nobody can say they don't work, which is rather clever if you think about it. If there was a definite system then word would soon get around that it was useless and sales would slump. It's important to perpetuate the myth that you really can win at roulette, but never be too specific! keep it vague! keep people wondering and sow the seeds of doubt! don't make the contradictions too obvious or even the stupid people will see it doesn't add up!

Kimo's books provide the 'tools' to win, and 'how you use them is up to you'! 

Why do you never see screenshots from " xxxxxxx 1.0 excel sheets " Roulette analyzer " and others not public excel sheets that show you the true values and parameters behind the game.
Wish AP use to see why and how they maintain an positive expectation regarding the method in use with advantage and can calculate there edge.
More trails and session they will even come to a point where they can get the perceived std to become actually std and so on.

Posting screenshots from an online casino with wining bets is not the same thing as showing measuring tools why you won with positive expectation.

Ridiculous.

O_o

I should add everybody should be aware there are rythms produced by the tendency the wheel is producing with the flow of the outcomes.>>>

What does this mean, Carpanta? Give some examples.

Quote from: Spike! on June 15, 2010, 04:05:02 PM
I should add everybody should be aware there are rythms produced by the tendency the wheel is producing with the flow of the outcomes.>>>

What does this mean, Carpanta? Give some examples.

Here is a very good example which illustrate what i mean. You should understand it, i believe:

[/quote author=Spike! link=topic=13871.msg112297#msg112297 date=1276628702]
Using past spins is the same as an Indian following the random trail of a randomly wandering deer in the woods. By looking at the clues on the trail, he doesn't alter the deer's path or change what the deer is doing in any way. By correctly reading the clues, he stays on the trail most of the time. Learning to do this takes years.

you are saying your past spins is creating the future spins.>>

Past spins give clues to future spins, they don't create them. The deer's trail gives clues to where he may be going. Just like past spins.
[/quote]

Here is a very good example which illustrate what I mean>>>

So you have no examples of your own, then.

Carpanta.Congrats on ur roulette challenge win..Good to see the good ol matrix pull it off once again..as yet spike guards his 72 percenter like a worn penny.

What challenge did he win, did I miss something?

Did u miss something? yeah u did..No apologies...good luck to all

No need for apologies. Thanks for the insight... or not.

Cheers.

Quote
Using past spins is the same as an Indian following the random trail of a randomly wandering deer in the woods.
By looking at the clues on the trail, he doesn't alter the deer's path or change what the deer is doing in any way.
By correctly reading the clues, he stays on the trail most of the time.
Learning to do this takes years.

Sure mate if you say so ...

O_o

What if there were at least 1 red deer and 1 black deer wandering about the wilderness and Big Chief Eatalotadeer told his hunting brave, Spikemotron to bring home a black deer  - cause red deer tastes like shyte.

So Spikemotron picks up the deer trails and decides to follow what he guesses is the black deer trail but when he gets there and fires off his arrow, the darn thing is green... GREEN!... a friggin' green deer... Spikemotron has spent his first arrow on a mangy old green deer not worth skinning.

So he picks up a new trail thinking this one is black for sure and fires off another arrow...well folks is it black or red?

Will Big Chief Eatalotadeer be dining on succulent, juicy black deer tonight, or will he be going for the meat tenderizer and the 12 hour bake to make best of a chewy, grizzly, sinewy, and mistakenly shot red deer?
 

-