This is the results of 151 sessions.

Around 3000 spins from Wiesbaden tested and really played, SD of 1.05, total profit : +770

Highest bet 6 units and it happened once. Average quantity of numbers played 1.68.

14, 10, 23, 13, 9, 29, 10, 1, 22, 22, -80, 4, -105, 29, 31, -16, 23, 31, 28, 10, -49, -81, 0, 34, 22, 22, 32, 29, 4, 23, -57, 34, 9, 34, 29, -5, 31, 19, 29, 14, 6, 9, -57, 27, 16, 27, -55, 12, -52, 10, 21, 21, -51, 0, 9, 14, 6, 29, 7, -14, 3, 26, 28, 7, 3, -40, 19, 20, -35, 9, 34, 25, 20, 28, 6, -15, -64, 28, 35, 19, 3, 9, 11, 30, -10, 34, 17, 11, 27, -81, 20, 9, 5, -35, 6, 9, 10, 4, 2, 13, 29, 14, 2, -6, 19, 7, -52, 15, 25, 32, 21, -50, -20, -44, 6, 14, -2, 16, 31, 21, -55, 20, 15, -41, 0, 33, 26, -56, 35, 20, 31, -2, 6, 14, 15, 23, 32, 0, 21, 13, -44, 3, 7, 24, 25, 29, 0, 26, -39, 13, -18

Is it good ?

Quote
total profit : +770

Is it good ?

If it profits consistently = OH YEAH! [smiley=tekst-toppie.gif]

I'm glad it recoups. There are some minuses ( - ), but the big picture is what really counts in gambling.

Kudos for this one Arte.

Would you like to look at it more deeply or it does not matter as it takes so much time to write my convulated explanations.  [smiley=lolk.gif]

What is the new trick? Arte
Hermes

It would take more than one person to motivate me to write more details. The reason i ask is because i have the feeling no one is really interested specially after my passage on G.G.

I don't know if I did something wrong but I tested your system for repeats - that one where you wait for 5 numbers and I lost more than won. Is it that one you mention here?
Hermes

No

QuoteIs it that one you mention here?

Arte, I like the waker methodology systems like the one you exposed before.

I observed that phenomenon and it is usually a fine event.

In fact, one of the things I thought long time ago was to "look backwards" on what happened with a number before becoming "hot", and although some were crazily hot out of nowhere, some others were steadily compensating for previous "coldness" as you say.

---

QuoteI have the feeling no one is really interested specially after my passage on G.G.

I doubt Gamblers' Glen has any influence on the regulars around. In fact, rarely the readers of our forum comment or say anything about GG. So in my opinion you shouldn't care about what happened there dear friend, it is here where we are that counts!


Let's use this environment! I like it better  

Best regards.
Your mate,
Victor.

Hey Arte,

I for one LOVE your methods.  I sometimes have a hard time wrapping my thick skull around them, but I'll make sure to ask more questions in the future to let you know your work is appriciated!
Keep 'em coming!

Cheers,
Matt

Here is a demo of this new method. Source of spins : Wiesbaden - table 2 January 30, 2008

The same picture but outside the image frame below:
nolinks://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/11/75/07/03/dynami11.gif

A sector is 9 spins large. You select the sector to play if it did not hit during the last 4 spins.

Here is a more complete demo :

Notice that each number played has been selected because it comes from a sector which did not hit on the last 4 spins.

Outside the image frame :
nolinks://i34.servimg.com/u/f34/11/75/07/03/dynami12.gif

That's different what I tested. Sector is last 9 spins?  Is it enough to pick up just one number from 9 which didn't show up for 4 spins?
If you don't catch the number later you have to bet all 9? Or I don't understand.
Hermes

Hermes do you see why i hate describing a new system because even though it is a simple idea it is always difficult to pass the knowledge.

When a number hit i place a string of numbers where number 5 (middle point) falls in line with the last number spun:
1 2 3 4 [5] 4 3 2 1

This help me split the wheel in a set of different dynamic sectors. Contrarily to the table layout with its fixed sectors using dynamic sectors gives me some more opportunities and is more precise. To understand this ascertion you would need to practice a lillte bit but since i use this concept my methods have improved. The reason i can say without doubts they have improved is because i monitor the standard deviation when i test them.

You know Arte everything is clear for that one who created the system, I know it from own experience but difficult to explain to others in English. What you try to do is called liquid sectors because the sectors are for every new game different, what is flexible idea.
Thanks for the explanation.
Hermes

Hello all, I am new to the board and am blown away by the free flow of ideas.

@Arte, I like this system, i was wondering, do you use a progression at all with it or just flat bet?  Obviously I mean probably a very light progression....

Just wondering [smiley=dankk2.gif]

-