Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I think i have found a good bet ...but we need tests

Started by viper5, August 18, 2009, 07:32:58 AM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

viper5

r jeaton1
why my fiend did u do that???

did u asked me 1st?

u have 2 choises!

1)ask apology and delete it

2)don t ask anything and tell victor to delete me from vls!

WITH WHAT U DID HOW DO U WANT THE MEMBERS TO TRUST THIS SITE AND POST HERE THIR IDEAS IF U EXPOSE THEM TO ANYONE?

Marven

Here is a real test.

67015 spins
16316 placed bets

Quote from: viper5 on August 18, 2009, 11:55:29 AM
r jeaton1
why my fiend did u do that???

did u asked me 1st?

u have 2 choises!

1)ask apology and delete it

2)don t ask anything and tell victor to delete me from vls!

Relax, it fails. :)

rjeaton1

Quote from: viper5 on August 18, 2009, 11:55:29 AM

WITH WHAT U DID HOW DO U WANT THE MEMBERS TO TRUST THIS SITE AND POST HERE THIR IDEAS IF U EXPOSE THEM TO ANYONE?

I didn't feel as though I was exposing it there Viper.  I thought you exposed it the moment you posted it for everybody to see.

I thought by programming it I was actually doing you and everybody else a favor.  However, if you feel as though I wasn't and you'd rather have it removed, no problem.

rjeaton1

It is gone Viper.  Next time you post an idea, if I go to code it, I'll make sure I ask you first next time.

viper5

MARVEN

u did something wrong 100%

this kind of play cant have only this UPs.....something he did wrong at the rx coding

ok jejeaton

I know that u are nice...just be carefull

did u coded rx to double the stak with every 1st win????

Marven

I just used the RX code.

If you suspect there is something wrong with the code, then I suggest you get someone to code it for you in private and test it over large sample sizes.

Those short hand-tests are insignificant.

Cheers

viper5

marven

I like manual things   hehahahahaha

lets hear what the coder has to say?couse if this resaults was without the double bet...then we have really good chances that it is a good bet

WARRIOR

HEY GUYS LONG TIME NO SEE ,VIPER TRYED THAT BET FROM THE FIRST DAY I SAWIT, SAVE YOURS SELF SOME BRAIN CELLS ,AND I DONT MEAN THAT IN A BAD WAY I HAVE TESTED THAT ONE ,THE REVERES BOFFINSDEN , THE TRAIL VERSION OF THAT BET , YOU COULD TRY SYSTEM 31 ,IT GOES LIKE THIS 111 22 44 88 WITH THAT BET THAT YOUR TRYING PARALAY THE BET ON A LOSS MOVE UP TO THE NEXT STAGE UNTIL YOU GET A HIT IF YOU LOSE 31 UNITS START OVER .WARRIOR

xman1970

Thx for sorting that out Viper & RJ  :good:

I have no doubt RJ was just trying to help, nothing more nothing less.....

I would suggest in the future, that ANYBODY looking to post & code somebody's way of play that they ASK the person in question first..... 8)

shadowman

I am confused by this,  what was Viper trying to achieve?  First of all he asks people to test his system,  and tells everyone what the system is that they should test.  Someone very kindly produces a program that fulfils the criteria,  which Viper then seeks an apology for.  Why??????

Surely Viper MUST realise,  as Marven says,  that short term manual testing is a waste of time,  and you need to see how the system performs over a large amount of numbers to determine if it works or not.  Someone, takes some time to  produce a code which will achieve fast testing over a large amount of spins, and Viper seeks an apology because it was posted. 

I cannot understand what Vipers problem was,  maybe someone can explain it to me.  Quite frankly if someone produced a code for me out of the goodness of their heart i would be delighted,  and extremely grateful.

Mike

mistarlupo

+1

I'm 100% with shadowman on this!
viper5 should ask for an apology! You just wasted Marv's & RJ's time with this buffin-muffin crap...

Breeze88

Quote from: viper5 on August 18, 2009, 11:55:29 AM
r jeaton1
why my fiend did u do that???

did u asked me 1st?

u have 2 choises!

1)ask apology and delete it

2)don t ask anything and tell victor to delete me from vls!

WITH WHAT U DID HOW DO U WANT THE MEMBERS TO TRUST THIS SITE AND POST HERE THIR IDEAS IF U EXPOSE THEM TO ANYONE?


wahts your point Viper ???? .. do you want to share bubbles full of nothing ???
say than you to rejaton .. for helping you in testing this crap longterm.... cheez

u dont know waht u want .. u said manny times roulette cant be beaten with any system know u stat shooting out new systems since then ??? .. wahts your point...

mistarlupo

Quote from: Breeze88 on August 18, 2009, 01:55:33 PM... u dont know waht u want ...
Teen age is like that...
(no offense Viper, we've all gone through it)
Man, I really hate this new tendency... "here's a HG, test it for me"... test it yourselves, you lazy b@3T@R0S! :diablo:

bombus

Quote from: shadowman on August 18, 2009, 01:41:42 PM
I am confused by this,  what was Viper trying to achieve?  First of all he asks people to test his system,  and tells everyone what the system is that they should test.  Someone very kindly produces a program that fulfils the criteria,  which Viper then seeks an apology for.  Why??????

Surely Viper MUST realise,  as Marven says,  that short term manual testing is a waste of time,  and you need to see how the system performs over a large amount of numbers to determine if it works or not.  Someone, takes some time to  produce a code which will achieve fast testing over a large amount of spins, and Viper seeks an apology because it was posted. 

I cannot understand what Vipers problem was,  maybe someone can explain it to me.  Quite frankly if someone produced a code for me out of the goodness of their heart I would be delighted,  and extremely grateful.

Mike


The explanation is a simple one..... Viper5 is a dickhead!

Sorry for my outburst.

rjeaton1, I apologize on his behalf.

Gotrek

That was weird@ss...

V: "Hey, try my system!"
R: "OK, here it is. Sorry it fails."
V: "WTF, are you retarded? I wanted a short term test to show it was winning. Now remove it you dumb f*ck."

Agree with Bombus.
Viper: Be careful what you ask for, you might get it.

Gotrek

-