Did mechanical systems exists ?

[eatlines]

Obviously mechanical system cannot exist.
in order to be able to exist it must have some combination of numbers or group of numbers that left constantly according  to its average, without delays nor advances and this is indeed what the chance does not know to fulfill.

[rjeaton1]

I agree.

Systems must be focused on sections that are equivalent to the session moves made at the casino.

The win of current game after 200 spins or the duration in real game should be more important than win millions of sets than people never will play.

Greetings,
WannaWin

The reason people test systems for millions of spins isn't because they intend to play that system for millions of spins.

It is because they want to see if the system fails.  If at any point, even if it is spin 999,000, the system fails that means it is a failing system.

The moment you lay your chips on the table could be the moment just before a losing session.

For example, you can test the Martingale on Red/Black for 200 spins and it can win.  Does that mean every time you walk into the casino as long as you don't play for more than 200 spins the system will work?

Of course not.  Focusing system tests to only the amount of time you'll play them in any one session doesn't make any sense.  Doing that is almost like intentionally not looking for something.

Imagine you're sleeping in your bed at night and you hear something break, and then you hear footsteps.  You get up and use a flashlight to look around, but you only look in your bedroom closet.  You don't find anybody in your bedroom closet, so you turn off the flashlight and get back into bed.  Does that mean you're safe?

@ Numero36 >>  It does look to me like your system is flat betting.  After looking at your uploaded bet history it looks like you're betting on 4 to 9 numbers at a time (with an average of about 6 numbers bet on at a time).  It also looks like a pretty successful system...so far.

If you'd like your system coded for RXtreme for a long term test, let me know.

[numero36]

rjeaton1
I want to thank you very much for your courteous explanation.
Yes this system is flat betting but sometimes I must play 5 or 6 or 12 numbers...
Thank you again for RX : Yes I'm interested to code it.

I have roulette experience to be sure that this system is like others : he will falls down at any moment.
But if I can "read" some red lights ... I can transform it to to a good system with "stop signals"  

[rjeaton1]

rjeaton1
I want to thank you very much for your courteous explanation.
Yes this system is flat betting but sometimes I must play 5 or 6 or 12 numbers...
Thank you again for RX : Yes I'm interested to code it.

I have roulette experience to be sure that this system is like others : he will falls down at any moment.
But if I can "read" some red lights ... I can transform it to to a good system with "stop signals" 

No problem at all Numero, glad to help.

I'm currently working on another RXtreme code for another fellow forum member, but when I'm finished I'll let you know.

Then, if you'd like to, you can PM me the system and I'll code it for you.  Then, you can watch the BR balance trend graph and try to correlate the larger drawdowns to what is happening on the table.

Maybe then you'll be able to see what makes a "red light" and when that "red light" turns back into a "green light".

[numero36]

No problem at all Numero, glad to help.

I'm currently working on another RXtreme code for another fellow forum member, but when I'm finished I'll let you know.

Then, if you'd like to, you can PM me the system and I'll code it for you.  Then, you can watch the BR balance trend graph and try to correlate the larger drawdowns to what is happening on the table.

Maybe then you'll be able to see what makes a "red light" and when that "red light" turns back into a "green light".

Thank you...

For Winkel : Here is a little party played FLAT BET You can see that the graph grows similar than the my first graph...

[numero36]

The betting history at flat Bet :

Spin,Number,Type,Bet Unit,Win,Loss,Net,Unit Bal.,
0,',,,,,,500,
1,'32,No Bet,0,0,0,0,500,
2,'9,No Bet,0,0,0,0,500,
3,'22,No Bet,0,0,0,0,500,
4,'30,No Bet,0,0,0,0,500,
5,'34,No Bet,0,0,0,0,500,
6,'20,Bet,10,36,-10,26,526,
7,'21,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,518,4 :
8,'29,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,510,4 :
9,'15,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,502,4 :
10,'11,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,494,4 :
11,'30,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,486,4 :
12,'21,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,478,4 :
13,'1,Bet,8,36,-8,28,506,4 :
14,'9,Bet,12,36,-12,24,530,4 :
15,'1,No Bet,0,0,0,0,530,
16,'5,No Bet,0,0,0,0,530,
17,'4,No Bet,0,0,0,0,530,
18,'27,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,522,4 :
19,'34,Bet,8,36,-8,28,550,4 :
20,'0,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,540,1 : 
21,'15,Bet,10,36,-10,26,566,1 :
22,'7,Bet,10,36,-10,26,592,1 :
23,'8,No Bet,0,0,0,0,592,
24,'30,Bet,10,36,-10,26,618,1 :
25,'8,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,608,1 :
26,'18,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,598,1 :
27,'20,Bet,10,36,-10,26,624,1 :
28,'26,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,614,1 :
29,'25,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,604,1 :
30,'32,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
31,'25,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
32,'29,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
33,'25,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
34,'22,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
35,'27,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
36,'23,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
37,'24,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
38,'35,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
39,'31,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
40,'12,No Bet,0,0,0,0,604,
41,'10,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,591,1 
42,'25,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,578,1
43,'15,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,565,1 :
44,'36,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,552,1 :
45,'22,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,539,1 :
46,'29,Bet,13,0,-13,-13,526,1 :
47,'21,Bet,13,72,-13,59,585,1 :
48,'34,No Bet,0,0,0,0,585,
49,'0,No Bet,0,0,0,0,585,
50,'2,No Bet,0,0,0,0,585,
51,'16,Bet,10,36,-10,26,611,1 :
52,'28,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,601,1 :
53,'13,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,591,1 :
54,'19,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,581,1 :
55,'11,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,571,1 :
56,'26,Bet,10,36,-10,26,597,1 :
57,'32,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,587,1 :
58,'19,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,577,1 :
59,'16,Bet,10,36,-10,26,603,1 :
60,'14,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,593,1 :
61,'23,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,583,1 :
62,'28,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,573,1 :
63,'34,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,563,1 :
64,'11,Bet,10,36,-10,26,589,1 :
65,'3,Bet,12,36,-12,24,613,1 :
66,'32,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,603,1 :
67,'32,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,593,1 :
68,'3,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,583,1 :
69,'15,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,573,1 :
70,'28,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,563,1 :
71,'0,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,553,1 :
72,'36,Bet,12,36,-12,24,577,4 :
73,'3,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,567,1 :
74,'4,Bet,10,36,-10,26,593,1 :
75,'34,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,585,1 :
76,'24,Bet,8,0,-8,-8,577,1 :
77,'22,Bet,8,36,-8,28,605,1 :
78,'29,Bet,10,36,-10,26,631,1 :
79,'16,Bet,12,36,-12,24,655,3 :
80,'30,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,645,1 :
81,'12,Bet,10,36,-10,26,671,1 :
82,'17,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,661,1 :
83,'16,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,651,1 :
84,'5,Bet,10,36,-10,26,677,1 :
85,'35,Bet,10,36,-10,26,703,1 :
86,'2,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,693,1 :
87,'21,Bet,10,36,-10,26,719,1 :
88,'28,Bet,10,36,-10,26,745,1 :
89,'0,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,735,1 :
90,'24,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,725,1 :
91,'27,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,715,1 :
92,'24,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,705,1 :
93,'15,Bet,10,36,-10,26,731,1 :
94,'30,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,719,4 :
95,'33,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,707,4 :
96,'19,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,695,4 :
97,'29,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,683,4 :
98,'0,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,671,4 :
99,'1,Bet,12,36,-12,24,695,4 :
100,'33,Bet,10,36,-10,26,721,1 :
101,'4,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,711,1 :
102,'9,Bet,10,36,-10,26,737,1 :
103,'8,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,727,1 :
104,'29,Bet,10,36,-10,26,753,1 :
105,'15,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,741,1 :
106,'26,Bet,12,0,-12,-12,729,1 :
107,'1,Bet,12,36,-12,24,753,1 :
108,'25,Bet,10,0,-10,-10,743,1 :
109,'33,Bet,10,36,-10,26,769,1 :

[winkel]

@numero

47,'21,Bet,13,72,-13,59,585,1 :

please explain:

How do you win 72 units flatbetting (betting 13 numbers with 13 units) on a straight number?

br
winkel

[numero36]

@numeroplease explain:

How do you win 72 units flatbetting (betting 13 numbers with 13 units) on a straight number?

br
winkel

You're right.
It is a mistake : The only mistake in the betting history...
Put 2 chips on a number instead off one...
Sorry for the mix.

Final result : 769 - 36 = 733

[winkel]

The same mistake happened in your first history several times.

If you just explain, what bet-selection you are using, we could tell something about the probabilities.
Otherwise it is boring reading game-histories full of mistakes with too few results just showing any win, nobody knows what is going on.

[numero36]

You think that my system is not "GUT" ? 

[numero36]

The same mistake happened in your first history several times.

If you just explain, what bet-selection you are using, we could tell something about the probabilities.
Otherwise it is boring reading game-histories full of mistakes with too few results just showing any win, nobody knows what is going on.

Bet selection was explained :
rjeaton1
I want to thank you very much for your courteous explanation.
Yes this system is flat betting but sometimes I must play 5 or 6 or 12 numbers...
Thank you again for RX : Yes I'm interested to code it.

[winkel]

You think that my system is not "GUT" ? 

No, but I started explaining G.U.T not with wrong statistics and graphs whioch show jsut any result.

I started explaining the bet selection to everyone.

pls do also

not only to one but to all.

br
winkel

[Natural9]

No, but I started explaining G.U.T not with wrong statistics and graphs whioch show jsut any result.

I started explaining the bet selection to everyone.

pls do also

not only to one but to all.

br
winkel

Winkel

Its riddles bloody riddles isnt it

Why not he just show the bet selection then it could be tweaked or proven right or wrong
Riddles bloody riddles arrgggg

At least Winkel revealed his bet selection in gut and got the whole forum buzzing with it at one stage


Regards Rodney

[numero36]

Good Luck  :

nolinks://nolinks.random.org/dice/?num=6

[Pactole]

Did anyone ever understood numero36's "mechanical system"?

It "seems" profitable. . .

[Pactole]

-