Roulette Raid

[TwoCatSam]

Keith

Thanks for that "expert" compliment.  I'm really not, you know.

I think you are spot on about the numbers having near-misses.  I saw a bunch of them.  But they were numerical, bet 12; 11 hits, and not spatial, bet 0 and 32 hits.  Numbers and their neighbors are spatial.

I'm working today and have little time for roulette.  (Can't believe I'm saying that!)

I'll think on it.

Thanks again!

Sam

[keith4444]

Hmm thats very interesting!
I'll try and record my data better from now on and put down actuals against predictions from RR

I suggest we all work together and that way we'll have a lot of data to analyze!
This program is so good we MUST be able to use it to our advantage!


Keith

[Roulette787]

Keith

Thanks for that "expert" compliment.  I'm really not, you know.

I think you are spot on about the numbers having near-misses.  I saw a bunch of them.  But they were numerical, bet 12; 11 hits, and not spatial, bet 0 and 32 hits.  Numbers and their neighbors are spatial.

I'm working today and have little time for roulette.  (Can't believe I'm saying that!)

I'll think on it.

Thanks again!

Sam

I've bought this software too. For me, it just seems to give a break-even result. (I usually go only up to 36 spins)

How many spins do you go in a single session?
Do you use their progression? (increasing bets after 17th spin)

Is there any stop-loss limit for you?


Thanks.

[TwoCatSam]

Played it once for real money and won a little.

Still testing; too new to rate.

Sam

[keith4444]

I've only ever played it in demo. Won 99% of the time but have seen the odd Looooong losing runs too. I'm sure if you have enough bank for your starting stakes and the table limits are say at least 10x initial stakes then your pretty safe with this.
I've heard of people who stop at 36 spins and some of them even flat bet for that many.
I always do exactly what the program tells you to do. That way its a fair test!
Each to their own tho eh!

Let us know how you get on!

Keith

[Roulette787]

keith,

Do you play till you get a hit EVERYTIME?
Is there any point which you give-up?

I've been playing in fun-money, (starting $1, BR $100), but there were a quite number of times I ran out of that $100.


Cheers.
Roulette787

[37to1]

Roulette787, I play RouletteRaid Solex most nights.
I play with a bank of 150 euros at DB. I will stop at that should I hit it, however I can't seem to lose with this thing! Some nights I have stopped on one single number win when it takes a long time.

Last night I hit four times in 63 spins!!!!!!

[Roulette787]

Roulette787, I play RouletteRaid Solex most nights.
I play with a bank of 150 euros at DB. I will stop at that should I hit it, however I can't seem to lose with this thing! Some nights I have stopped on one single number win when it takes a long time.

Last night I hit four times in 63 spins!!!!!!

37to1,

Do you follow the RR recommended progression?
(increasing bets after 16th spin?)

[37to1]

I use RouletteRaids progression, it's nice and slow but normally wins between 20-55 units. 

[Clint]

Has anyone tried betting the neighbour either side of recommended number using Solex. Obviously we're looking at three units per bet rather than one and a steeper progression but got sick of just missing number, so I tried a quick 100 spin test at Dublinbet yesterday and enjoyed a good few wins. Will try again tomorrow.

Regards

Clint

[TwoCatSam]

Clint

That is not a bad idea.  I've noticed that once RR starts hitting within two or three numerical spots of where it picked, a win is coming.

Sam

[steveh3167]

Whilst playing around with Roulette Raid using spin results kept from past games (from a live wheel) I observed that some numbers generated from the first 10 inputs came up in the second set of 10 numbers from the live spins. I have summarised the observations below. The observations are based on only 21 games of 20 spins each. The first 10 spins were used as history and the resulting Raid numbers compared to the second set of 10 spins.

% of Raid input sequence that appeared in second set of 10 spins:
1 16%
2 9%
3 7%
4 9%
5 9%
6 11%
7 7%
8 20%
9 5%
10 7%

that is of the 1st number generated by Raid following the first actual spin, it appeared 16% of the time in the observations of the second set of 10 live spins.

% of winning spin sequence
1 5%
2 18%
3 14%
4 7%
5 11%
6 11%
7 11%
8 7%
9 9%
10 7%

that is of all numbers generated by Raid in the first set of 10 spins 18% of them came out as winners in the second spin of the second set of 10 live spins.

In all there were 44 winning numbers over the 21 games giving an average of 2 per game. This excludes repeat winners within the second set of 10, if repeats are included the number increases to 52. There was one game in which there were no winners.

Would be interested to know if anyone else has observed or experienced something similiar, or any comments regarding same.

Steve

[TwoCatSam]

Steve

I have a pot full of numbers from Wild Jack.  Should I break them down into 20s and use the first ten for the indicator?

Sam

[steveh3167]

Hi TwoCatSam

Yes. Enter the first 'live' number and record the resulting Solex numbers for 10 spins (in total). For recording purposes ignore the first (default) number that Solex provides before numbers are entered. Then just compare the Solex results against the next set of 10 live numbers from the same spin session.
Regards, Steve

[Clint]

Hi Steve/2Cat, this is very similar to what I've been testing over the weekend. I've listed each recommended 'Solex' number for five spins then bet only the solex numbers inc future solex numbers after misses. I am hitting within 6-10 spins usually (or 1-5 spins after the original 5) but this will require a steep progression. The longest I've waited (in 500 spins) is 20 numbers (15 step progression) which will have most people inc myself sweating somewhat.

Any advice welcome on this one.

Regards

Clint

[Clint]

-