War is here untill the truth is kept on the forum

[TwoCatSam]

People

I am going to beat this drum one more time:  If you want to correspond with this fellow-do so!  If you don't-then don't.  I will guarantee you if not one swingin' dick will respond to him, he will say his spiel, get bored with reading his own posts and leave! 

Ignore, people, ignore!

Sam

[Jakkalsdraai]

Hi Skakus

I'm working with the mods now so wait and see .   But I will only post in the winwithmath section of my teachings.  We all here want this place to be the best place to be.  One Mod has step up to the plate and is trying to do the best thing for this forum Where in the world would another forum ever try this .  You can thank Lanky for stepping up to the plate and doing what a mod should do and that is to make this forum the best of the best.   I fully respect Lanky and the whole forum should also.   I don't kiss as* and I never will But I give respect to a person if he does the right thing. 

To ALL here
Your friend

winwithmath

AND anyone who doesn't, will get to do with me! 


Jakk

[Tangram]

If you want to correspond with this fellow-do so!  If you don't-then don't.  I will guarantee you if not one swingin' dick will respond to him, he will say his spiel, get bored with reading his own posts and leave!

I agree with you Sam, but it's never going to happen. There's always going to be someone who believes that he has the HG and this is going to create conflict with those who don't agree. Like this:

Why can't the lynch mob (you know who you are) just go for a picnic or something, instead of loitering around with their hangman's noose waiting to string people up?

It was the same thing with the Dyksexlic and Charles Hampshire fiasco. These people are only interested in stirring things up and causing trouble.

He has his own section and it's still not enough, he wants to take over the forum. He has posted his system but I can't find a clear explanation of it. And why can't anyone post in his section? if there was some positive feedback there might have been a bit more interest, but there's nothing.

[warman]

I also agree with you that people need to post both sides I will work on that with Lanky. One way is to post them in the P.M. and I will ask you can I re-post it here and answer it.

When someone says this won't work That's great but show proof also just don't say it . When I was posting I also had a bit saying here is proof that I have . Facts always tell the truth and that's what I do show facts.

winwithmath

[Number Six]

This is getting beyond a joke. Several members of this forum have said winwithmath's system was tested multiple times and found to be a failure. This guy has been banned at least 7 times in the past week. He is a self-absorbed serial troll and a paranoid delusional. Nothing he says even comes close to being credible. The administrators can easily ban his IP from accessing this site. It's time to exile this fool for good.

[lucky_strike]

Dear winwithmath.

I don't agree but that does not mean that I can not be polite.
So I would like to ask you two questions.

It has been tested 3,000 shoes in baccarat flat betting.

That sound good to me, but I have an issue with it.
As we know 3.000 trails have a littel meaning as we use placed bets for measuring when we talk about Masse Égale. (My opinion).
Now how many placed bets was made with the 3.000 trails ?
Can you show use an sampel where you gain 100 units with 1024 placed bets (flat betting) ?

As all system I do I have proof before I write it

Thanks sounds very good to me but do you have any statistics results you could show us ?

Many thanks LS

Ops that was three questions...

[Lanky]

The administrators can easily ban his IP from accessing this site. It's time to exile this fool for good.

No Six You are wrong Mate.

Xman and I can do no such thing...neither could Sam when He was an Admin .....We have/had no control over that whatsoever.....We never did.....

Only Victor could do anything like that.....that's the way its set up Mate.....that is Strictly Victor's Domain and always was.

Lanky.

[Number Six]

Well then, better pour him a glass of wine and shove a cigar in his mouth because he's gonna be here for ever, his very own cyber asylum.

[warman]

Hi Lucky

Nice post.
Answer I know this guy that tested it from the G.G .We aren't great friends at one time kind of said a few bad words at each other. Then he tested it the right way and it had prove to be a winning system in the long run and only flat betting.

He also agreed that testing it  would be only in a live casino that you will get the best results because you can only sit for so many hands not a million or even the 3,000 he tested.

Read my post it say's flat betting only so what he did he flat bet say at least 35 times because in a shoe there are at least about 75 plays. Since we skip bets as I had shown to get the prior prior information that leaves 35 plays.

Now at 35 plays a shoe he came ahead at the end ahead at least $100.00 a shoe that is at least $ 300,000.00 now that's not bad.

What He did he added up the wins + 4 took off the loss and still won after 3,000 shoes

Now 3000 shoes X 35 plays a shoe now that is what I call Great.Using flat betting only he found out the casino can't win with my system

Now if you want E-Mail the guy to find out more.

The reason why other people loss they didn't understand it or just posted saying it didn't work Yet NO one ever showed proof that it doesn't work.

Your friend

winwithmath

[warman]

I said I took out the V.I.P a long time ago with the truth. It will never be the same and they kown it now I guess. I told the truth there and their lies took them down

winwithmath

[Diarmaid]

 

[Diarmaid]

-