Winning Roulette Strategy Created By Professional Gambler...

Bo0Merang · October 31, 2009, 03:22:08 AM

Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 03:07:13 AM
"finaly I get right answare after long time" >>>

MR.J no worry im just talking about time which we have to spend with wheel to make some money..sometimes it is not easy and hour orr two isnt enough>>>:

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 03:28:00 AM

Concerning Flat Bet,i try to test my new 26 numbers strategy with 150 casino live spins i was up and down, (at times +90 up)at the end of 150 spins i was -36 units down.With progression im +412 units.

Seykid.

Nathan Detroit · October 31, 2009, 03:28:29 AM

Seykid,

Why make changes when you are doing ok. If it ain`t broke....... don`t fix it.

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 03:47:56 AM

Ok.It's just that i am running my strategy through different frankenstein process...its aliiiive

Thanks for your view.Appreciated.
Seykid.

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 07:40:48 AM

Hi Ken,
Yes me again.Are you a professional roulette player?
Seykid.

Mr J · October 31, 2009, 09:34:21 AM

Thats open to interpretation. Full time player? No. Do I know what I'm doing? Yes. Ken

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 10:22:38 AM

Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 09:34:21 AM
Thats open to interpretation. Full time player? No. Do I know what I'm doing? Yes. Ken

Elaborate the second part.You mean like playing what you can afford to lose,sticking to your bet etc...
By the way a pro/semi-pro advice,How much numbers you encourage playing?
Seykid.

Mr J · October 31, 2009, 10:54:04 AM

How many numbers? 1-4 numbers but 2-3 is my favorite and remember, thats only my OPINION. When I started out, I played what I could NOT afford to lose (including the rent) but did so anyways. Why? I didn't care, the "lure" to me was more important than being a working sucker. Now, I CAN afford to lose, so its not the end of the world. Not sure if this answers your question. Ken

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 11:01:07 AM

So you are either playing repeaters or sleepers i guess.

Mr J · October 31, 2009, 11:14:31 AM

Thats a *LONG* answer. lol My methods are scattered over many boards under many names and two NEVER posted. Some methods I no longer play because of too many loses but if you read older posts, I guess you would not know that cause its still listed. Sleepers? I play them LESS now compared to a couple years back but I do "mess with" playing a sleeper (furthest back) after it has hit. I play around 4 different (listed) methods. One of my favorites >>> I track all spins and locate the furthest back hit street. It must be a minimum of 27 spins back. I then WAIT until it hits, lets say its the 7 8 9 street. It might hit right away or I had one sleeper street for like 110 spins a few weeks ago !! Lets say the 8 hits. I then start a 56 step progression on the 7 & 9, all the while keep track of everything hit. After a win, start over. This method has NETTED me *ALOT*, I'll leave it at that. Ken (PS -- I hope none of my posts here get deleted, you never know)

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 12:18:20 PM

Quote from: Mr J on October 31, 2009, 11:14:31 AM
Thats a *LONG* answer. lol My methods are scattered over many boards under many names and two NEVER posted. Some methods I no longer play because of too many loses but if you read older posts, I guess you would not know that cause its still listed. Sleepers? I play them LESS now compared to a couple years back but I do "mess with" playing a sleeper (furthest back) after it has hit. I play around 4 different (listed) methods. One of my favorites >>> I track all spins and locate the furthest back hit street. It must be a minimum of 27 spins back. I then WAIT until it hits, lets say its the 7 8 9 street. It might hit right away or I had one sleeper street for like 110 spins a few weeks ago !! Lets say the 8 hits. I then start a 56 step progression on the 7 & 9, all the while keep track of everything hit. After a win, start over. This method has NETTED me *ALOT*, I'll leave it at that. Ken (PS -- I hope none of my posts here get deleted, you never know)

Wow that is a long progression. I will re cap on your systems.Thanks.

Nathan Detroit · October 31, 2009, 12:42:28 PM

This is NOT a reply:

But many posts here remind me of : " I will always be chasing rainbows".

Good luck to ALL of you . May someday reality will catch up with you . There are no winning systems and NEVER will be.

Too many egomaniacs are walking the boards all over the globe and their stuff is eaten up hook line and sinker. .

Au revoir.
Nathan Detroit

There is NO winning system ! NEVER EVER !

Just enjoy the illusion..

Mr J · October 31, 2009, 01:21:21 PM

Whats the definition of that? If a method is "WAY UP" (I dont mean $400) and THEN slowly starts to tank......then the method is kicked to the side and never played again (keeping the profits), any issue with that? And, kicking it to the side is ASSUMING it will continue to tank. I assume that instead of HOPING it doesn't. Ken (PS -- what is wrong with GG lately?)

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 07:53:34 PM

Hi,i post this back no one answers,maybe you can.Have you ever pick 5 fresh numbers,every number spin add to list,every repeat add 3 units for 37 spins.I call it Build up Method. SEYKID.

seykid29 · October 31, 2009, 07:53:34 PM

-

News:

Winning Roulette Strategy Created By Professional Gambler...

Bo0Merang