Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

8 streets system update by Kattila/Manaman

Started by kattila, December 07, 2009, 08:20:00 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

manaman

Kattila, After testing the original I ran into LL followed by LL and it wiped my bankoll out... I'm now on to testing your patterns (way C). One thing I'm having trouble getting my head around is that you would need to win around 250 times without a loss just to cover 1 loss with a 5 step prog  :o  ..So I'm testing using the 1 up 1 down which means your less likley to lose your shirt if a you get to step 5.. which I feel is only matter of time because I've already got to step 3 which was actually after AAA, so thats 6 in a row!!

Below is my results after 101 spins using your way C going up on a loss and down on a win... see this way you can use 1 unit bets on each instead of 0.20 which may have won all but instead of being on +80 you would be on +24.8 risking a loss of 180 I think.. see what I mean? and as you can see in my results its only 31 games with 101 spins, so to get the 180 games needed to cover a loss is going to be roughly 500 more spins :wacko: anyway I will keep testing........


1,W    +4
2,W    +8
3,W    +12
4,W    +16
5,LLW +4
6,W    +12
7,W    +16
8,W    +20
9,W    +24
10,W  +28
11,LLLW -4
12,W  +8
13,W  +16
14,W  +20
15,W  +24
16,LW+24
17,W  +28
18,W  +32
19,W  +36
20,W  +40
21,LW+40
22,W  +44
23,W  +48
24,W  +52
25,W  +56
26,W  +60
27,W  +64
28,W  +68
29,W  +72
30,W  +76
31,W  +80 (101 SPINS)



manaman

 Almost had a 8 in a row on game 36/37... :spiteful:

This next lot is not as good as the last,alot of repeats but recovers well..... so far!


32,LW+80
33,LLW+68
34,W  +76
35,LW+76
36,LLW+64
37,W  +72  (36/37=BBBBBCBB)
38,W  +76
39,LW+76
40,W  +80
41,LLLW+48
42,W  +60
43,W  +68
44,LW+68
45,W  +72
46,LW+72
47,LW+72
48,W  +76
49,W  +80
50,W  +84
51,LW+84
52,W  +88
53,LW+88
54,W  +92
55,W  +96
56,LW+96
57,W  +100
58,LW+100 (100 SPINS)


MATTJONO

dont want to seem like am jumping in but can i suggest trying something.  i dont have roulette extreme but if anyone fancies doing a test then i think its worth a look.


---play the last 2 groups hit ( 8 streets )

1. with 5 level sataking plan
2. with the triggers below to start and stop betting on the last 2 groups hit (flatbets, or +1 unit for the next attack following a loss on the previous attack.

START BETTING
LW,W,W,W
W,L,W,W,W

STOP BETTING
L,W,L,L
L,L,W,L
L,L,L
L,W,L,W,L


MATTJONO






manaman

Hav'nt tested this for a while,but had a tweeking idea about a better progression.. and for once 'so far' it seems to have improved it  :)

The trouble with up 1 on a loss from a new game was when LW happend there was no change in the bankroll.... so.... simply remove the 2 from the 1 2 3 4 5 up but leave it for the going down..... so it's 1 3 4 5....ect... then back ....5 4 3 2 1, this way you gain on every LW and the game after too(should it be a W).....simple but effective  :spiteful:

These are the same results from my previous testing but with the total after the ___ is 1 3 4 5.. prog

1,W    +4____+4
2,W    +8____+8
3,W    +12___+12
4,W    +16___+16
5,LLW +4_____0
6,W    +12___+12
7,W    +16___+20
8,W    +20___+24
9,W    +24___+28
10,W  +28___+32
11,LLLW -4__-12
12,W  +8____+4
13,W  +16___+16
14,W  +20___+24
15,W  +24___+28
16,LW+24___+32
17,W  +28___+40
18,W  +32___+44
19,W  +36___+48
20,W  +40___+52
21,LW+40___+56
22,W  +44___+64
23,W  +48___+68
24,W  +52___+72
25,W  +56___+76
26,W  +60___+80
27,W  +64___+84
28,W  +68___+88
29,W  +72___+92
30,W  +76___+96
31,W  +80___+100 (101 SPINS)
32,LW+80___+104
33,LLW+68__+80
34,W  +76___+92
35,LW+76___+88
36,LLW+64__+64
37,W  +72___+76  
38,W  +76___+84
39,LW+76___+88
40,W  +80___+96
41,LLLW+48_+52
42,W  +60___+68
43,W  +68___+80
44,LW+68___+76
45,W  +72___+84
46,LW+72___+88
47,LW+72___+84
48,W  +76___+92
49,W  +80___+96
50,W  +84___+100
51,LW+84___+104
52,W  +88___+112
53,LW+88___+116
54,W  +92___+124
55,W  +96___+128
56,LW+96___+132
57,W  +100__+140
58,LW+100 __+144(201 SPINS)

Will now test some more.....back soon :good:

manaman

more results from a new batch of numbers......

01,W___+4
02,W___+8
03,LW__+12
04,W____+20
05,LLW__+4
06,W____+16
07,W____+24
08,W____+28
09,W____+32
10,W____+36
11,W____+40
12,W____+44
13,LW___+48
14,LW___+44
15,LLLW_-8
16,W____+8
17,LW___0
18,W____+12
19,LLW__-12
20,W_____0
21,W____+8
22,W____+12
23,W____+16
24,W____+20
25,W____+24
26,W____+28
27,W____+32
28,LW___+36
29,W____+44(102 SPINS)


keel44

Can you guys give a complete set of rules for your method of play.  I have read through all the posts.  Maybe when some testing is done, you could have an official method of play.  I am a little confused on your w/l registry, if you use one.  A step by step instruction would be nice at this point because it seems you are having success.

Steve

If you havent already, I suggest test over 100,000 spins with RX. Any system can do well in the short term but more extensive testing better tests systems.



manaman

Quote from: Steve on March 09, 2010, 12:26:26 AM
If you havent already, I suggest test over 100,000 spins with RX. Any system can do well in the short term but more extensive testing better tests systems.

I have RX but testing with it manually and slowly.... I'm not set up in the head for the coding needed to test 1000's of spins... I'm wired up to use the 'not so boring' creative part of my brain(boring to me that is).

I would'nt mind guessing that someone here on this forum has coded it and tested it... and probaly moved on to the next by now,but sharing Is'nt a strong point in most people today.... unless it's negative of course  :D

manaman

Ok, For keel and others, this is how I play (although kattila explained it well).....

....below is my next lot of results,and 01 is the first game which the first group (spin 1,2,3) was BAA so first bet would be 1x8 units on Group A&C.... which as you can see it was Group B so it lost....so, now it's 3x8 units(because it's 1 3 4 5... up on losses) on Groups B&C.... which as you can see it was Group C that won and that makes +4..............

.........next game now is 02 and I use the last Group/number that won... which was C, then spin two more to get my next Group which as you can see is CAB......so 2x8 units (because last game we left on 3x8 and it's  ...4 3 2 1 down on wins) on Groups A&B.... which as you can see won so it's +12......... next game 03 was AAA and C won so +16...and so on....  


01,LW___+4   BAA[BC]
02,W____+12 CAB[A]
03,W____+16 AAA[C]
04,W____+20
05,W____+24
06,W____+28
07,W____+32
08,W____+36
09,W____+40
10,W____+44
11,LLW__+28
12,LLW__-8
13,W____+8
14,W____+20
15,LW___+16
16,LW___+12
17,LW___+8
18,W____+16
19,LLW___0
20,W____+12
21,W____+20
22,LLLW_-24
23,W____-8
24,W____+4
25,LW___0
26,W____+8
27,W____+12
28,W____+16(100 SPINS)

manaman

-