Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

LAST WON COLS DOZENS tweak check newest update.

Started by bikemotorman, December 27, 2009, 09:58:49 PM

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

g-unit

hey bike when someone tells you "your system failed after testing for 1 million spins, dont worry. Tell me one person who sits at a roulette table and plays a system for 1000 spins straight, its crazy. Its hard to test a system and know if its truly effective . If something works remember to have good money management and a nice bankroll.

bikemotorman

Has anybody used this in a brick and mortar casino yet one guy said he was going to try it in New Orleans.

Let me know.

Stuart

Danger Man

Quote from: g-unit
hey bike when someone tells you "your system failed after testing for 1 million spins, dont worry.   Tell me one person who sits at a roulette table and plays a system for 1000 spins straight, its crazy.   Its hard to test a system and know if its truly effective .   If something works remember to have good money management and a nice bankroll.   

It isn't hard at all to know what is effective and what isn't.   Systems need to be tested extensively to find out how often they lose and if it's viable to recoup any losses before you lose again.   It's simple commonsense.   Testing a system for less than 100,000 bets is pointless and irrelevant.   People say it isn't because they can be bothered testing that much or just want to believe that what they have is a winner.   Any system can lose at any moment.   You might sit down at a table and lose your entire bankroll in 10 minutes.   This could happen twice, three times or four times on the trot.   There is no mechanical bet with a low enough variance to win consistently.   Meaning that everything fails, it's only a matter of when.  And since no one can possibly know that, systems are just too risky to play for any amount of money you can't afford to lose.  "Money management" means nothing when your risk of ruin is always 100%.

g-unit

100% of people that think mm isnt important i guarantee you are loser,regardless of the billion tests they perform. Once you have been here a while you will see what i am saying. I got a winning system and i owe it to steve morgan, nathan and all the other vets on this forum. I tried to share my knowledge love it or leave it.  Good Luck!!!

Danger Man

Money management is irrelevant if you don't have a real edge, it isn't going to help you win more than you lose in the long run.     

pins

try this. leave out the dozen that has won and pick one dozen from the other two. after a winning dozen the next result is likely to come from the othe two. if a dozen repeats  wait before you bet. you can not win backing two dozens.

panzer

this is holy grail.  tried it in atlantic city.  awesome.  how can i bet on line?

Jish

Quote from: panzer on February 21, 2010, 11:41:08 PM
this is holy grail.  tried it in atlantic city.  awesome.  how can I bet on line?
have you read the thread from start to finish?

moles40

Quote from: fqbien link=topic=13767. msg95104#msg95104 date=1265505283
Alaways in winnings . .

Now 50€, starting with 7€.

Betting all spins, last column, then last dozen.

Just a few spins, then I stop and play later.

Thinks it will fail, but I will stay in profit, because progression max cost me 23,10€.

I'm playing on RNG wheel.

I like the sound of this,why not try it on live wheels with low min bets.

Casino's like joyland and 21 nova have min bets of 10 p.  :good:

bikemotorman

You are playing last two columns then last two dozens or last one col or dozen, which are you playing you are not clear on how you are playing let me know.

I have seen at most seven losses in a row so a smart virtual play would lower the risk.

Stuart

panzer

 by hedging the ststem is foolproof.  won 1,000 dollars on it so far

bikemotorman

Quote from: panzer on March 01, 2010, 05:43:53 PM
by hedging the ststem is foolproof.  won 1,000 dollars on it so far

Hi Panzer explain to me how you are hedging the method and are you playing 12 numbers or 24 numbers also are you in the US.
I dont think it is foolproof but we can dream lol let me know are you playing double zero wheel or single zero.


Stuart :)

keel44

I think I have a good idea on a progression type.  It does take some care to keep track of your losses on the current run.

You start the run with betting 1 unit on each of the 2 dozens or 2 columns.  You then increase your next wager to WIN 1/2 of how much you are down.  If you get that win, increase your very next wager to profit 1 unit.  That is basically it.

You see you need 2 wins in a row to fully complete the run.  If you alternate W and L, then you will slowly sink.  If you have a string of losses, you will also slowly sink.  The point being you can catch your 2 wins in a row at some point.

8 losses in a row and you are down 256 units....your next bet would be 256.....That would be my bankroll MAX=512


:yes:

panzer

very good with this system.  you are never on cold group or column.  i hedged with inside and won 1000. 00 in 4 sessions

bikemotorman

Please explain further regarding your play and success.

Stuart

bikemotorman

-