the roulette professor

[therouletteprofessor]

hi bayes
the only issue i have with online is that there is a possibility that the house can have methods that monitor your every move.  they will give you a taste but i believe that your losing ratio per visit will be higher than land based.
you cannot beat a computer. 

[Bayes]

you cannot beat a computer. 

You can't beat a rigged game, that's for sure.  There are certainly rogue online casinos, but in those cases the issues are more to do with withdrawing winnings than fixing the outcomes to make sure you lose.  The logistics of actually doing this when you have multiple players is something which is overlooked by those who put forward this theory.  If you stick to recommended onlines (by casinomeister. com) the chances of being ripped off are slim to zero.  People too often use this as an excuse for their own ignorance and lack of discipline.

[superman]

As a programmer I used to create my "systems" in RX and watch them flop, RX isn't rigged, now I mostly create the systems in a bot and let it flop in real time by running it against RNG at a casino in REAL money mode, just not placing any bets, the point I am putting across is, the same systems fail in RX at the same rate they do at an online casino.

I also output my data (spins, bet placement, progression (if any) and result) the results are the same, so as far as I can see online RNG is no different to RX RNG therefore the casinos I use probably are not rigged it's just Random catching us out.

[therouletteprofessor]

thanks b, i ll pick one and do a test. 

[therouletteprofessor]

ok, who are the boys?

[Bayes]

Not sure who the "boys" are, but I would recommend Lohnro. He is a long-time member and used to be a moderator. IMO he's completely trustworthy (and he's a fellow Aussie, if that makes any difference).

I would offer myself but I've only just joined the forum (although I've been reading it for a long time). However, I'm a programmer so I could write code to test your system.

[Jish]

(and he's a fellow Aussie, if that makes any difference).

haha ofcourse it does

[therouletteprofessor]

ok, so how do i get in touch with "lohnro" and to bayes what city are you in?

[Bayes]

I don't live in Australia, but the UK. Lohnro might reply to you in this thread, or you could send him a PM.

[Lohnro]

I am still around "therouletteprofessor", what did you have in mind??

[therouletteprofessor]

hi, i am looking for a way to have a chat with you directly, cant seem to find the pm tab. or do you have access to my email address being a moderator?

[superman]

PM/IM icon looks like this

Prof is the system programable? I mean is it a set trigger then do something?

[therouletteprofessor]

hi superman,
thanks for that if it had legs would have a kicked me in the head,
no there is no trigger or waiting for seqeunces nonsense, start betting method stop when you like start when you like. whether or not its programmable ?? mate when i left school calculators were being introduced. i ll ask the guys who set up my website

[Bayes]

whether or not its programmable ??

prof,

"programmable" basically means - does it have clearly defined rules? It means that given a sequence of spins, if there was more than one person using the system on that sequence, then each of them would end up with exactly the same results. This means there is no subjectivity or ambiguity in the rules, so you're not expected to "guess" at any point in your play what the next decision will be.

In order to program (simulate) a system, you have to know exactly what the system requires you to do at all times.

[therouletteprofessor]

yes then it is programable. however the method is that easy to use that a computer sim seems hardly worth the effort. everybody has access to a pen and paper, even in the casino, yes i am old.  cheers

[therouletteprofessor]

-