HOW TO WIN AT ROULETTE *THE BALANCE OF 5*

[Number Six]

How isn't this system the fundamental opposite of the zone?

[superman]

Fender, now your acting like a muppet mate, I did not say how I tested your ZONE fallout method, it's obvious to me how you reached the NEWER ZONE, all the misses form the old one, your chasing random buddy, exactly what everyone else does here, how much you 'say' you have made has no relevence here, I, as others, can see straight away why they fail, accept it, it is true, the only 'other' person who said they made a profit was Stacks, you should go back through all the data you have and try to come up with something a bit more solid, something that will withstand the effects of random. I have never knocked your systems, everything is worth a try.

Now Joe bloggs comes along and says sorry mate ye strategies tank on me 100,000 spin per minute air vacumm random orbit simulator JIMMY

I didn't challenge you in my post did I? but you feel you need to respond with moans and groans about simulations, and 100,000 spins is far too much for your strategies buddy, they tank in 100 already. If I did run them as a simulation it would be against live wheel data, but it's much quicker to watch them tank live.

But as far as Superman's question isn't that a genuine one?

Funny, you overlooked that, don't break a leg getting off that horse mate, it looks high up there!

[Number Six]

Superman 100? You need to go into more depth about this. Because you are not playing this game properly at all. WHERE WERE YOU TESTING? Start giving some depth here. I have 112 winning sessions in a row with this strategy and you say it cannot even survive 100. You are either playing a rigged casino or have mis-understood the strategy. GO TO LADBROKES LIVE. And tell me it tanks in 100. Thats where I have won 112 sessions in a row. Maybe everyone needs to be testing these strategies EXACTLY WHERE I DO. Where do you think Stackbundles has won?

Fender, always with the same lame-ass excuses, "you've done it wrong" "it's rigged" BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH

You are a shill for Ladbrokes. We all know it.

[Number Six]

I asked the same question as superman, which you are trying to squirm out of answering.

How isn't this system the fundamental opposite of the zone?

[moles40]

first test

w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w

2nd test

w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w

[GLC]

Hey Fender,

Sorry for being so dense, but if you wait for a dozen to sleep 4 spins then bet on the other two, if you lose do you continue to bet on the same two or do you wait for a qualifier to bet again.  In other words is a bet only placed on the 5th spin?

Thanks,  GLC

[Spike!]

 Lets put it this way you have the best of both worlds with these two strategies. >>>

I can see that. After 4 spins you can bet for it to stay awake, or bet for it to stay asleep. The probability of both happening is exactly equal. Quite by accident, Fender has discovered the truth about roulette: All events are equally likely to happen. And the ironoic part is, he didn't even see that Balance of 5 was the polar opposite of the Zone, they cancel each other out!

[GLC]

Yes Moles. You do not have to complete a session this is where people lose the plot. The objective is to quit when you have a profit. Could be anything from 1pt to 4pts. They add up. Also this strategy has a markedly better performance on columns. Again before the math heads jump all over that statement. COULD IT BE THE LAYOUT POSSUM? Yes you tend to get less clusters of 5th spin hits on the columns. Its the columns that gave me 112 winning sessions. Dozens are better for the zone and pretty good for THE BALANCE OF 5. But I will favour columns for this strategy they're more volatile which suits it perfectly.

Fender,

You listed my question and directed your answer to Moles so I don't know if your answer applies to my question or not so I'll ask it again.

Do you requalify a dozen or column after a bet on the 5th spin  whether you win or lose?

If you do, is it possible to play THE ZONE one the dozens and THE BALANCE OF 5 on the columns at the same time?  If so, it might make things move along at a quicker pace.

George

[moles40]

As soon as any double has missed 4 times you bet the other 2

1
2
1
2 -bet doz 1 +2
3
2
2 bet dozen  2+3

[Herb6]

I would favour the dozens for THE ZONE. And columns for THE BALANCE OF 5. The reason being I think the dozens show more stability. Which suits that need to stay within that boundary of 5----8. Whereas the columns are MORE volatile.

Fender,

A quick FYI...  A column contains 12 numbers.  A dozen contains 12 numbers. Therefore a column = a dozen.

So why are you telling people that the dozens are more stable than columns?  


Honestly, do you actually read what you're writing?    

[GLC]

As soon as any double has missed 4 times you bet the other 2

1
2
1
2 -bet doz 1 +2
3
2
2 bet dozen  2+3

Thanks Moles

George

[Herb6]

Fender and Stackbundles,

I've got news for you...A dozen and column both contain 12 numbers each, consequently they will both hit and miss at the same frequency in the long run within the random game.

[Bayes]

It's not working for me. 

[Herb6]

Bayes,

That is the funniest graphic. I coughed up another kidney laughing.  I'm going to steal it use it sometime.  I love it.  

I don't know if I can laugh any more today. 

[superman]

excellent Bayes

[superman]

-