ONE SMART METHOD THAT WORKS

[albalaha]

      Dear friends,
                          I do not feel this method is worthy of even trying as double progression would not work and we need triple progression which is again very very dangerous and one failure can not be covered by dozens of wins even.  so why should someone try such a system?
              Let's calculate
                   we put say 5 units each on two rows then our total cost =10 units+1 on zero, say we lost here
                   again we put 10 units on each of two dozens+1 on zero  . . . . . . . . here our total cost reaches 32 units and even if we win this time  we are at a loss of 2 units,  and if we do not place one unit on zero still there is no profit.
             What an idiotic and irrational system.  If you cover 25/37 you will definitely strike accordingly but losses would also come and that would be irreparable.

[bikemotorman]

That may be true that no progression can overcome a wipe out losing run.
But on the positive side I have many times of 15 wins in row and after a loss I switched to columns and had seven more wins.
When I wait for 2 virtual losses things seem to get even better.
No why would not cover 0 00 it is cheap insurance more so if you have 80 dollars on the table.

Stuart

[albalaha]

dear stuart,
                  you mean to say you would use a progression like this  1-3-9-27-81-243=   3 5 4 units + units on zero.
Isn't it would be the silliest thing to do? One losing session's loss would be covered by 400 something winnings.  You do not need any streak to lose your bankroll.  Just one failure would make you bankrupt.  As I said earlier, you can not use a progression like 1-2-4-8-16-32.  Please give a satisfactory and digestible answer.

[bikemotorman]

I WOULD NOT USE 1 3 9 27 IT IS TOO STEEP I AM USING HERMES PROGRESSION AND IT IS FINE.
IN DOLLARS 5 10 20 40 NOW I MAY WAIT FOR SOME VIRTUAL LOSSES THEN PLAY.


I GAVE YOU THE ANSWER.

Please give a satisfactory and digestible answer.



STUART

[bikemotorman]

Ok more good results today and lots and lots of practice using a safer progression the results are more balanced also, I am no longer trying to make a killing lol.

I am now having more fun with this method waiting for a couple of LLs is now more easy.

Stuart

[albalaha]

dear stuart,
                 do not try to fool people by stating that you are using hermis progression of 5-10-20-40 etc, I have already elaborated that this progression can not earn you a penny but loss on two dozens/rows:

Let's calculate
                   we put say 5 units each on two rows then our total cost =10 units+1 on zero, say we lost here
                   again we put 10 units on each of two dozens+1 on zero  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  here our total cost reaches 32 units and even if we win this time  we are at a loss of 2 units,  and if we do not place one unit on zero still there is no profit. 

Please do not fill this forum with garbage and do not confuse people. 

[bikemotorman]

dear stuart,
                do not try to fool people by stating that you are using hermis progression of 5-10-20-40 etc, I have already elaborated that this progression can not earn you a penny but loss on two dozens/rows:                           Please do not fill this forum with garbage and do not confuse people.  

IF YOU DONT LIKE MY ANSWER DONT POST ON MY THREAD UNDERSTAND, I HAVE TOO MANY PERSONAL PROBLEMS TO BOTHER WITH TROLLS.
I DONT HAVE TO PROVE MYSELF OR MY IDEAS TO ANYONE.
SOME OTHER PLAYERS HAVE COME UP THESE IDEAS AND METHODS MANY YEARS AGO, IN FACT I SPOKE TO A SEASONED PLAYER LAST NIGHT AND HE SAID HE THOUGHT ABOUT THIS IDEA OF ON A LOSS CONVERTING TO COLS AND SWITCHING BACK AND FORTH ON A LOSS.

[albalaha]

Ok,
        that means play hermes progression and keep  losing is your method. Good job. Atleast try yourself a method before teaching others.

[bikemotorman]

I tested this for over two months and it has always done well however to end in a plus you have to play at least 3 virtual LLLs then play for Cash that is the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
The drawdown of playing 2 doz or cols will get your bankroll if you are not careful.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

OK I JUST PLAYED A BIT ON JEBET AND HERE ARE THE RESULTS.



WWWWLLLWWWLWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWLWWLLLLWWLWLWWWWZW
       


I MOST OF THE TIMES WAIT FOR THREE VIRTUAL LLLLS


albalaha I UNDERSTAND YOUR POINT NO ROOM FOR PROFIT BUT AT TIMES I PLAY VIRTUAL AND I TIMES ON A WIN I DOUBLE MY BET JUST MATTERS ON THE WAY THINGS ARE PANNING OUT.
AT TIMES I USE 25 DOLLAR UNITS AND AT TIMES 5 DOLLAR UNITS.
THIS IS A STREAK METHOD JUST BE CAREFUL.

I THINK WAIT FOR FOUR LLLLS THEN BET BIG BUT I MAY HAVE TO WAIT 2 HOURS AT TIMES LOL.



STUART

[albalaha]

look stuart you just can not win through hermes progression. you can win only if you strike your first chance, but whenever you move ahead there is a loss with zero and no profit without it.

[anakin]

Hi Stuart,

First of all, thanks for sharing.  Would like your advice on the 5-10-20-40 progression used in this method.

                    Bet               Total Cost       Result        Winning
Step 1    $5 on 2 dozs           $10               L                  0
Step 2    $10 on 2 dozs         $20               L                  0
Step 3    $20 on 2 dozs         $40               W               $60

What's next after step 3, as it is still short of $10 to breakeven (Total Cost = $70 & Winnings = $60).

Thanks,
Anakin

[bikemotorman]

Ok so the only thing I can do is use this progression then after LLL 5 15 45 135 405 that should be safe.

Stuart

[bikemotorman]

That is in US dollars very steep.

[albalaha]

stuart,
             your suggested new progression-5-15-45------  is the easiest way to commit suicide. Forget this real krazy system. You are a senior member, think something else.

[albalaha]

-