The > BlackPearl Double DZ/CL Strategy < Enjoy !!!

[BlackPearl]

Hello Insidebet !

I will only answer You ONE time...

1. You say, this is nonsense.... Ok !
2. You cannot explain, WHY You make such a weak statement 
3. Your pseudo arguments are giving NO information for others at all to make decisions or understand 

Listen, my friend:  In my case, I would NEVER be so rude and arrogant to tell someone,
his strategy is nonsense, when I am not able to PROVE my own statements....


So we come to a conclusion: 

Fact:  I am delivering the PROOF for the fact, that my Strategy IS working (through explanations and LIVE tests).
Fact:  You have done NOTHING at all:  NO explanations, NO proof for your statements ( no LIVE tests for the failure of my strategy etc.)

I think, You are abit overworked  OR  You are a casino agent, who is paid for visiting Gambling forums
to use pseudo arguments and stupid discussions in order to bring the good strategies down...

>>> SO NOW YOU HAVE TO PROOF TWO THINGS AND MAKE THINGS CLEAR FOR US HERE !!!

1.   Deliver the proof for Your statements
2.   Deliver the proof, that You are no casino industry agent

We will wait for that proofs patiently...    Oooh Yes, we will wait... wait ...   wait     and  wait  .  .  .


Someone, who is calling others "braindead", should use his brain in a better way like you have done ! 

IF You return here, then ONLY WITH facts  and proof of your statements !!!
Otherwise stay away and post your destructive and negative thougts where they belong.

I will never answer to such or similar postings again -- it simply makes no sense and it is a waste of time !

Sincerely,
ROLF 

[Christianjn]

Blackpearl: The only thing I don't understand is what you do when LD is hit.

Imagine that you start a session lose a few times and SD has increased to 8.
If now LD is hit you are not in profit.  Do you reset both LD and SD anyway or do you continue to increase SD?


Regards.

Christian.

[BlackPearl]

Blackpearl: The only thing I don't understand is what you do when LD is hit.
When the LD was hit, we are reducing losses with that smaller win...
In this case we DO NOT reset both bets to -1-/-1- , which is the Basic Bet.

Imagine that you start a session lose a few times and SD has increased to 8.
If now LD is hit you are not in profit.  Do you reset both LD and SD anyway or do you continue to increase SD?
In this case there is NO RESET and the bet on the SD will be encreased according to FIB and the strategy described !

Regards.

Christian.

[elemen2]

Black pearl I recognise your writing signature. 


were you previously registered as  no more bets?  your english has also rapidly improved quite recently.

I  normallly avoid these debates but you spammed my posts when I was previously registered as element. 


i lkie your cape.

[snoowly]

that strong be with you

I Hope u feel better first.

I come to you with LAST question about your system.  promise


Blackpearl: The only thing I don't understand is what you do when LD is hit.  
When the LD was hit, we are reducing losses with that smaller win. . .
In this case we DO NOT reset both bets to -1-/-1- , which is the Basic Bet.  

We dont reset both bet, OK! I m right and understand this.

LD hits. we have 2 chips on it, or 3 or 5 or 8,..... we reset to -1- on LD?
or we keep current bet on LD and continue play with chips on LD and Chips on SD?

You say we dont reset Both bets to -1-/-1-  if LD hits, but never u say if we have to reset LD bet to -1- if this last one hits and if there is one progression on it.

Dont be angry because I always ask you this but this in only thing you dont answer each time I asked explanation for it in all my posts.


Thanks youuu and wish you will feel better and strongly with your health.

Olivier

[BlackPearl]

Black pearl I recognise your writing signature. 
That`s nice ... 

were you previously registered as  no more bets?  
No, Sorry, my Dear!  One or two years ago I was registered as "GreyOwl" here, but as nothing else...

your english has also rapidly improved quite recently.
Thanks for the flowers !! 

I  normallly avoid these debates but you spammed my posts when I was previously registered as element. 
I never spam around... nowhere

I lkie your cape.
? ? ?

[BlackPearl]

that strong be with you

I Hope u feel better first.

I come to you with LAST question about your system.  promise


Blackpearl: The only thing I don't understand is what you do when LD is hit.  
When the LD was hit, we are reducing losses with that smaller win. . .
In this case we DO NOT reset both bets to -1-/-1- , which is the Basic Bet.  

We dont reset both bet, OK! I m right and understand this.

LD hits. we have 2 chips on it, or 3 or 5 or 8,..... we reset to -1- on LD?
YES, please always reduce the current bet on a DZ to -1- after a hit on it!
>  Does not matter, which DZ was hit, reset to -1- always.

IF the SD was hit, there is ALWAYS an OVERALL new profit balance reached,
so in this case You can reset BOTH DZ to -1-/-1- in this case.

or we keep current bet on LD and continue play with chips on LD and Chips on SD?
Again: please always reduce the current bet on a DZ to -1- after a hit on it!

You say we dont reset Both bets to -1-/-1-  if LD hits  
Yes, only reset LD then, not both,
but never u say if we have to reset LD bet to -1- if this last one hits and if there is one progression on it.
IF there is a progression on the SD and the ball hits --> reset BOTH DZ
> IF there is a hit on the LD, when there was NO progression on it before, STAY with -1- on it...
> IF there is a hit on the LD and there IS already a progression on it, reset to -1- always after the hit!

Answered now ?    
   

Dont be angry because I always ask you this but this in only thing you dont answer each time I asked explanation for it in all my posts.
This was not done by purpose -- Sorry ! 


Thanks youuu and wish you will feel better and strongly with your health.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH !!!

Olivier

[snoowly]

 

U answered perfectly
Nothing to say more...

Have a good day ! I will be able explain other if there is some Questions

[BlackPearl]

U answered perfectly
Nothing to say more...

Have a good day ! I will be able explain other if there is some Questions

It was a pleasure to serve You !   

Sincerely,
ROLF 

[GLC]

BP,

I have been testing this for a while and have been having phenomenal success on paper.  Sometimes I use Hermes suggestion to switch between LD/SD to Last two Dozens.  I use a standard 2:1 martingale for 12 steps (1-1-2-3-4-6-9-14-21-31-47-70).  This doesn't win as much when the SD hits, but still wins enough.  I switch back and forth between bet selections after every 4 losses in a row.  This gives me 12 chances and 2 changes of bet selection before a major loss.  So far so good.

I'm still scratching my head as to why this wins so well.  Up to now I'm winning at over half a unit per spin which isn't bad for dozens only.  I'm starting to test this by playing both dozens and columns and if at any win I am ahead overall, I reset both dozens and columns at the same time.  This reduces units won per spin but is somewhat safer.

A big loss must be coming soon.  If not, I'm going to have to go down to the local casino and see if it holds up when real money starts changing hands.

Cheers, George

[BlackPearl]

Hello George,

THANKS for Your reply and for Your very interesting contribution !!!

I have also tried different prog step variations, but I am always returning to the one described here in the Topic.


One question:

Why do you calculate with a major loss?   ---   Is this necessary ?

Yes, it can happen, but I think, only, if You do not use a StopLoss border of 20, 25 or 30% of Your bankroll...

IF Yo limit Your time in the casino, Your winning goal set at 10% and a StopLoss, what can happen?
Four or five looosing session in a row?   ---   I don`t think so...

Even if this would happen, which would be the GTA (greatest thinkable accident):
In my case it would be only the loss of the house money...

What do You think ?  


Have a good day, my friend!

Sincerely,
ROLF

[insidebet]

Blackpearl,

Please read what I write correctly before you get red in the face...

1- I never said your system is nonsense.  I only said that betting on all three dozens at the same time is. (Under condition 5)

2-Saying that betting on all three dozen is a complete nonsense is NOT a weak statement, as you put it.  It is the MOST BASIC FACT anyone who has ever played roulette for REAL should know!

3-I already proved that doing so is idiotic, to use a polite word.  Please read reply # 65 on June 6 and reply 74 on June 7.  You obiously did not pay attention to those post.  Now it is your turn to prove what I wrote on post 65 is wrong...

4- Your live test are no proof at all.  I already tested your thing some 5000 spins and it well at first, but tanked miserably later. 

5- My statements are not "negative" as you put it.  Just trying to teach a bit of the most elementary math to some who obviously don't have a clue.

Insider.

PS I am one the very few here that have made some decent money playing this game. 

[GLC]

Hello George,

THANKS for Your reply and for Your very interesting contribution !!!

I have also tried different prog step variations, but I am always returning to the one described here in the Topic.


One question:

Why do you calculate with a major loss?   ---   Is this necessary ?

Yes, it can happen, but I think, only, if You do not use a StopLoss border of 20, 25 or 30% of Your bankroll...

IF Yo limit Your time in the casino, Your winning goal set at 10% and a StopLoss, what can happen?
Four or five looosing session in a row?   ---   I don`t think so...

Even if this would happen, which would be the GTA (greatest thinkable accident):
In my case it would be only the loss of the house money...

What do You think ?  


Have a good day, my friend!

Sincerely,
ROLF

BP,

What I mean by major loss is to lose a whole progression as listed in my post which is a total of 209 units less any buffering by small wins along the way.  So far I haven't even gotten close.  I don't know if I will ever bring in the 3rd line of bets because I don't really understand their function.  If I ever get far enough behind to bring on the bets on the 3rd dozen/column, I'll test it and see what difference it would have made or not.

Losing 209 units every now and then is a big hit, but I think that all the wins along the  way should still leave me with a nice profit. 

G.

[BlackPearl]

Hello "Inside" !

As I said before:   Normally I would not answer again,
but for the sake of members here to benfit from this Strategy,
I want to make some short statements:

1.  I am covering ZERO also with adequate bet, OK ?  So no losses on ZERO !
2.  If such a Strategy is tested over more than 1000 spins, 5000 or however,
    it always will lose!
    REASON:  IF YOU DO NOT KNOW, WHEN TO STOP, GO HOME and leave the casino
    with Your winnings, IT IS YOUR FAULT...  Stupid long testing says nothing about this Strategy!
3.   LIVE TESTING and LIVE RESULTS is the only reliable method to test any strategy !!!
    Endless simulations don`t help at all. This is like the so called "Backtesting" in Forex Trading. Worth nothing.

4.  Where are Your Strategies posted on the Forum?  Where are Your ongoing LIVE Results ?

IF You present something of similar quality here, You are welcome here again...
I WILL NEVER criticise Your strategies or Your results... Why should I ?

So, my friend, IF You can handle Point 4, then You can return here again...
Nobody will listen to You, if You are not capable of this !

That`s all

ROLF

[insidebet]

Blachpearl and others,

I too will post this for the benefits of others because you simply don't understand anything I'm saying.

1-As I said, I am a long term winner, flatbetting.  I posted the method some three years ago and I won't mention it again.

2-Betting on all three dozens AND covering 0 is even more ludicrous!
Stop posturing and think about it for more than half a second!  There is one, AND ONLY ONE, way you are 100% sure to lose some money on a spin.  Yes my friend! It is to bet all 36 numbers (or all 3 dozens) and 0.  If you do this, you 100% sure to lose 1 unit per spin.  And please don't tell me you bet more on some dozens than others.  Read  Reply # 65.  Why don't you tell what you think about this? 

(By the way, this has nothing to do with me wanting to be right at all cost.  I have better things to do.)

3-I don't criticise your efforts.  Good on you for trying so hard.  But when I know for certain that something is fundamentaly wrong, I feel I'm contributing by giving my opinion.

4- You don't agree with longtime nonstop testing.  There has been a lot of discussions about this.  I know that if you test one continuous session of 10 000 spins or 200 sessions of 50 spins, the results will be very similar.  You can disagree on this, but if you do the test you will see for yourself. 
Playing short sessions is relying on good timing which is essentially luck.

5- As of your point #4, I will post another winner here if (big IF) and when I have a long term winner flatbetting.  I can post 100 methods tomorow that will win on the short term and come crashing down once the progression hits a session from hell.  What would the point of that?  Will I gain your respect for presenting 100 losers?

Regards,

Insibet (The only way, trust me on that)

[insidebet]

-