Is It Possible To Make a Good Bet on Purpose In Roulette?

[Noble Savage]

Spike, here's the hard truth:

You have nothing of substance to offer anyone in these message boards. (please, if anyone benefited from Spike's posts to reach a consistently winning method step in and just let us know you exist. Anyone?... That's what I thought. )

Everything you say about science/math/statistics is utterly ludicrous and shows what an ignorant person you are.

Anybody with commensense and a BS-detecting brain is called a "mathboy" in your books.

You're an old roulette wannabe. I'm sure you heard this a lot but... Get a life mate.

[Noble Savage]

Like Kelly said: 5 minutes wasted.

Bye.

[Mr J]

I have said this many times....Quality of posts means different things to different people. Spike has ALOT of real life casino experience. Not 50 years worth but the guy DOES play and knows the ins and outs, whether anyone likes it or not. There are quite a few posters that dont agree with my style of play but RESPECT what I 'have to offer'. Let me ask this....aside from the way Spike plays, does he not offer good, quality posts/threads? Yes, sometimes a bit over the top but still, a damn good poster. He is not as 'crazy' as he was two or so years ago.  Ken

[Steve]

My opinion on this matter is: it is POSSIBLE to beat ECs, but I dont believe anyone has legitimately done it, yet. In my experience, anything that doesnt contradict basic principles that govern everything is possible. But actualy making it reality is a different story.

[Spike!]

You have nothing of substance to offer anyone in these message boards.>>>

Since you seem to have appointed yourself the expert on what posts have substance, please give some examples of what you consider substance. This should be easy for you as you know immediately when they don't have substance. Right?

>>Everything you say about science/math/statistics is utterly ludicrous>>

To whom? Certainly not to the few of us who are actually living them. Try not to include everybody into your limited view of science/math/statistics. It just makes you look kinda prejudiced..

>>You're an old roulette wannabe...

Actually, I'm an old blackjack has been. I've only been playing roulette for 5 years, I'm still an up and comer..

[Spike!]

Not 50 years worth but the guy DOES play and knows the ins and outs, whether anyone likes it or not. >>>

I started playing BJ in Vegas in 1975. There were no casinos in my state till 1996. Now there are 30 here, with another opening this summer. A lot of people here weren't alive when the only place to legally gamble in the States was Nevada.

[pins]

as  a regular player. the maths will always win in the long run. a player who can win more in the long run then he loses,  i have yet to meet.if you could see the players records in the casinos .nobody wins in the long run. its like horse racing. william hill said he never knew anybody who won two seasons in a row. to make a educated guess. you need some information. in roulette every spin is a separate event.

[Spike!]

>>to make a educated guess. you need some information. in roulette every spin is a separate event.>>>

On the EC's there are only two events possible, discounting the zero. On R/B, theres only red and theres only black. Not exactly a daunting task.

[bombus]

There are 37 numbers on the wheel. Random can mix them up as much as it likes, but it is obliged to fit them all into only 6 table layout EC possibilities (excluding zero). So if you are going to try and guess your way to winning then it does make some sense to guess the EC's.
There are also only 6 Doz/Col possibilities on the carpet, but these pay 2/1 and so would probably be even more lucrative for a good guesser.

[Spike!]

There are also only 6 Doz/Col possibilities on the carpet>>>

Add just one outcome to the 2 outcomes of the EC's and its a whole different game.

[Noble Savage]

On the EC's there are only two events possible, discounting the zero. On R/B, theres only red and theres only black.

No s**t.

Not exactly a daunting task.

So guessing right, over and over again, is not a daunting task.

Interesting and most revealing post, Spike.

Now that's the typical Spike post. Nothing of useful substance to this community, just an "I can do what you can't do". To pose and posture as though we were below him and his "reading random" ability.

It just makes you look kinda prejudiced..

Suppose there is a man in your town who claims he can walk on water and constantly implies such an ability of his in nearly every discussion he starts or participates in (with a refusal to prove or back it up). On the other hand you've studied the laws of physics and are pretty familiar with what's possible and what's not, yet investigated the subject and attempted to find ways to walk on water too for nearly one year but eventually failed and came to the conclusion that it can't be done. Does expressing your disbelief in this man's claims then make you "prejudiced"?

Have a nice BS-free week everybody.

[Ka2]

I have to agree here with Noble.

[bombus]

 So spike, do you try and guess which EC will hit next, or which EC will miss next?

It's a serious question... I'm leaning toward the doz/col bets and I'm thinking it might be better to try and guess which one will miss and bet the other two, as opposed to trying to guess the winner.

[Spike!]

So guessing right, over and over again, is not a daunting task.>>>

Pretty much. How's that for pointing somebody in the right direction. Beats the heck out of 'wait for 8 dozens to sleep and then bet on whatever'. Or maybe a post like that has 'substance' in your world.

>>You have nothing of substance to offer anyone in these message boards.>>>

Since you seem to have appointed yourself the expert on what posts have substance, please give some examples of what you consider substance.

[Spike!]

>>do you try and guess which EC will hit next, or which EC will miss next?>>

Makes no difference as there are only 2 outcomes.

[Spike!]

-