Winning at Roulette with a system is very possible.

[Mr J]

No no no, lets try again. Where is *YOUR* evidence, that you are making a killing playing your way?  Ken

[Herb6]

 Notice the women at my table are considerably hotter than your $25 ugly Anime avatar woman.  This is prove that I'm winning far more money than you are at the wheel.  

[Mr J]

Thats not 'evidence'. Would it hold up in court? So for the SECOND time.....what is your evidence besides a LINK. lol  Ken

[elmo]

I was reading what somebody wrote on a forum a few years ago and it captured my attention.

Here it is.....


Creative gamblers always (without being academics) have by playing the game (which is always the most important of any theory: empirical result), found ways to assimilate all the information (probabilitytheory, stats, whatever) into a strategy that works although mathematicians would disagree that it would work.

It shows clearly the discrepency between purely analytic research (which always refer to 'a negative expectancy game can not be beaten)
and empirical research (playing).

The pure academics keep on referring to 'negative expentacy' which is ALWAYS with any casino game the problem, never the less it's staggering in the gambling venues I visit that there is a great amount of difference with players that come in and leave half an hour later broke, or regular even daily players which are doing pretty good playing negative expentency games -none of them ever play slots by the way: only BJ and Roulette.

Although they all have some sort of base system they stick to, they do not play mechanically. They always seam to adjust there strategy according to the situation, and I'm sure the applied strategy is a very complex meltingpot of probability, statistics what all has turned into intuition (but of course the academic would simply dismiss the last as 'gamblers fellacy').

Not all of there bets turn out right, but in the end there amount of wins exceeds the losses. Never the less the 'negative expectancy' applies for both groups: the constant loosers and the regular winners. Could we state that the last group only had constantly more luck than the other group?

........... Long term winners need more than luck, not only have they found a way to beat the game but they have also found a way to beat the casino. The latter can be much harder than the former IMO.

[Herb6]

Mr. J,

Where is your proof? 

[Mr J]

I have no proof (thats called answering a question). You showed HOW you play, I'm not asking for that. For the THIRD time, what/where is your EVIDENCE that you are doing VERY WELL playing however you play? Dont explain to all of us YOUR STYLE (AP, whatever) of play, we got that part already. So far, we have....

A) A cool pic with a couple females
B) A link

PS >> Where is my good buddy Davey Jones? lol  Ken

[Mr J]

PS >> I see you changed your post. lol  Ken

[elmo]

"Where is my good buddy Davey Jones?"

He has joined a more advanced level of roulette discussion.
Very informative I might add. I typed "progressions" in the search engine and to my surprise nothing came up. Fancy that!

[Mr J]

Ummm, ok. I mean, I wasn't sure if he quit the board entirely?    Ken

[Herb6]

After having consulted with The Consortium of Wise Men, we have determined that it's not possible for you to win in the long run, since you're not an AP player.

Furthermore,

1. You're not very bright
2. You clearly are not a mathboy
3. You lack experience
4. You have poor taste in women.
5. And you have no sense of humor.

[Mr J]

"By the way, what happened to your other ID, KJ Smooth?" >>> I dont get it? You mean at GG?  So for the FOURTH time Herb/Snowman, will you be posting EVIDENCE that you are doing VERY WELL as an AP (call it what you will)? When can we expect that PROOF? It does not have to be this very minute but WHEN can WE ALL expect to see it?  Ken

[Mr J]

This was AGAIN added in later >> Furthermore,

1. You're not very bright
2. You clearly are not a mathboy
3. You lack experience
4. You have poor taste in women.

[Mr J]

"By the way, what happened to your other ID, KJ Smooth?" >>> I dont get it? You mean at GG?  So for the FIFTH time Herb/Snowman, will you be posting EVIDENCE that you are doing VERY WELL as an AP (call it what you will)? When can we expect that PROOF? It does not have to be this very minute but WHEN can WE ALL expect to see it?  Ken  ((Is there a REASON some dont answer questions? lol ))

[Herb6]

Talk about prove, Here you go:


1. Notice how hot the women are.

2. The one on the left is whispering, "Wow, he's hot and he clearly wins more than Ken does!"
3. The girl on the right is whispering, "I can't wait to get the two of you on my right back to the room!"

As a member of The Consortium of Wise Men, it is generally accepted that my style of play (being an AP player)is prove enough that I will win money in the long run and that you won't.  Furthermore, Anime chicks are NOT hot and if you find them hot, then you are most likely a child molester.

-Herb6

[Mr J]

@Herb/Snowman >> Sooo, funny jokes take the place of EVIDENCE?  I answered you, any chance you might answer me? You took the cowards road, show ALL OF US the proof and the subject is dropped. I just got an email, I did not know DJ is permantely gone, I had no idea.  Ken

[Mr J]

-