Winning at Roulette with a system is very possible.

[Herb6]

No it didn't.  You obviously made a mistake while doing the arithmetic.  As I recall, you're not a mathboy.  

[Mr J]

"You'll just have to explain what prove you'd like to see" >>> Use your head acorn. Lets examine what EVIDENCE is NOT.....a pic of cash, a pic of two females, a link etc. Check out the definitions of proof and evidence. I already answered you many posts ago, we are ALL STILL WAITING on you Herb.  Ken

[Herb6]

Well, Ken, explain what you'd like to see as proof and then perhaps I'll consider your request.

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

I take it that you're NOT a mathboy either.   I don't know why you can't do that arithmetic without a calculator when you're at the table.  Why don't you just memorize the progression?

This is the point, it's not like anything I've ever seen refered to on a forum, (either BS or MM).
That is why I understand Spike's point of view when he says it will fail,
but that is like saying a NORMAL table with 4 legs that's been standing
for 5 years is going to colapse for no reason!!

Glenn.

[Spike!]

explain what you'd like to see as prove>>

Thats 3 times now you've used the word 'prove' instead of 'proof'. You do know the difference, don't you?

[Mr J]

I'm asking YOU to show us here, EVERYTHING you feel is PROOF. I can give you more time, I did say that. Its not what I am asking for...its what YOU CAN SHOW us. So again, we have on your list....

A) A possible future pic of cash/chips (owner unknown)

B) A cool pic of two females

C) A link

So, add to this list AS MUCH or AS LITTLE as you want. Ken

[Herb6]

Proof:

1. The chicks I posted were much hotter than your Anime girl.  (Seriously, your avatar gives me the creeps. She looks like a little girl with tits.  I sure hope you're not a child molester)
2. I am a member of The Consortium of Wise Men. (Secret AP club)
3. I am a Snowman, and EVERYONE LOVES AND TRUSTS A SNOWMAN.

If this isn't good enough then you need to explain exactly what you would consider to be proof.

[Spike!]

I think the point Ken is trying to make is that he KNOWS he goes to the casino and makes money. Yet the MathBoyz constantly say he doesn't, without offering any proof that they themselves do make money. So he feels that his word is just as good as theirs, and he has a point. Just because the VB boys can point to some story from 10 ears ago about how some jerk won a bunch on money playing VB, they think we should beieve them if they claim the same thing. Why should Ken prove what he does when no VB guy ever has to. So there are books on VB, big whoop. That doesn't mean you're making money doing it.

[Spike!]

He's always here or on countless other roulette boards like Spike>>

I can make a post at 10am and the next post at 5pm and am accused of 'constantly' being on here. The ignorance of most people is mind boggling. I didn't post at all today till after 4pm, yet to Herb, I've been here all day. Whatever..

[Mr J]

Spot on Spike. My point is, one definition for all. I have no solid evidence, nor does anyone else. Is that a big deal? No, but then someone such as Herb should not DEMAND it from others. Even if someone posted that they watched 'so-n-so' play and win thousands over months, thats still not proof. That person could be lying, correct? Ken

[Spike!]

I only ever talked to one VB guy. He would stand at the airball wheel last year for the whole time I was there, writing stuff down. He was there every time I played. I talked to him and he was very evasive at first, but he eventually told me what he was doing. As far as I know, he never played. All that time wasted for nothing, I was very impressed. Not.

[Mr J]

"Ken goes to a casino? When?" >>> Often and up until around three months ago, I went very often. I have OTHER things going on thanks to gamblers fallacy!  Ken

[Herb6]

Mr. J.,

The physics and case history on VB is solid.  It is easily proven, and even the wheel manufacturers recognize that it has been a problem.  

However your absurd system can not be proven effective in the long run.  It's just not possible for it to work and I've proven that it can't work mathematically.

[Mr J]

I'm asking YOU Herb to show us here, EVERYTHING you feel is PROOF. I can give you more time, I did say that. Its not what I am asking for...its what YOU CAN SHOW us. So again, we have on your list....

A) A possible future pic of cash/chips (owner unknown)

B) A cool pic of two females

C) A link

So, add to this list AS MUCH or AS LITTLE as you want. Ken

[Mr J]

"The physics and case history on VB is solid.  It is easily proven" >>> AGAIN, I'm not asking what you play/study. Ken

[Mr J]

-