END is a possibility

[loungeplayer]

.

[NS]

What makes you think he's not?

Because I know that someone with a million dollars of roulette winnings in his bank account won't be trolling this forum with screenshots of his $100 bankroll and his winnings from predicting the exact 1 or 2 numbers in some online casino.

Those who can, do.
Those who can't, preach, write books, and post screenshots.

Greedy people think of great wealth.

No. Greedy people worship money for the heck of it (we got some of them in here).

Successful people think of great wealth.

Good successful people think of great wealth, but not just monetary wealth, and do see beyond themselves.

and offer charity, anonymously,  to those who truly needs it.

That is good, but I don't see the relevance here other than to make him look good (which I'm not saying he isn't).

[Jakkalsdraai]

Hi Noble,

Loungeplayer is a nice guy. I have communicated with him in the past. So the same for Kimo. I understand the frustration of looking at screenshots being posted and not understanding what's going on. This was most probably not the correct thing to do. Simply because of what had happened in previous years with guys posting screenshots and then utilizing that info trying to sell systems.

Loungeplayer is NOT a seller though. I know him personally. He is not claiming to be a GPM expert either. He is the first that will tell you that he is evolving as he goes on. As far as Kimo is concerned. I do not understand what the obsession is with guys that want to attack him. I ONLY play Kimo's methods for online purposes. So far it has treated me more than fair. Kimo is most probably the only non VB player that does not hit back at what you and I do. Have you ever seen him critisizing VB, Bias or any other method? Like Spike, Mr. J and Gizmo? I know I haven't.

I think it is better to leave the GPM crowd alone. They,and I include myself here, (although I do bother other people!) are not bothering anyone......except annoyng a couple of people with screenshots!

Cheers buddy!
Jakk

[NS]

Hi Jakk,

Thank you for the clarification mate.

loungeplayer, pardon my being tough on you. I am skeptical when it comes to people claiming to beat roulette with non-scientific/physics methods, and I have been here long enough to see the truth behind all the system players, system sellers, screenshot posters, and educated guessers (who, funnily, are anything but educated) who claim to win consistently at roulette, spread ignorance, and shamelessly take money from the uninformed.

Thank you for understanding and I wish you the best.

[Jakkalsdraai]

Thanks Noble,

I know you just want to stand up for the guys who are scammer's bait. I know you are a stand up guy and very knowledgable about the physical aspects of the game. Respect! Thanks for understanding mate.

I still wanted to ask. Did you see the challenge is underway? I see you haven't posted a bet prediction yet. Just confirming with you that you know that it has started.

Cheers mate
Jakk

[NS]

Oh, I didn't know it started.  I saved the link to the thread named "New challenge" and have been following it.  But I see the challenge is taking place in another thread. Thanks for telling me Jakk, I could've missed it. lol

See ya there.

[loungeplayer]

.

[Boo_Ray]

I used to play simple strategy for 4 numbers..
Just play dominant movement(H,N or B) and 2 dominant stars out of last 36 spins for 2 or 3 hits with a 25 step progression (never lost).. then retracking last 36 spins and do it again.. usualy stoping after about 2h of play because it was boring xD

[Jakkalsdraai]

Hi Boo_Ray,

Thanx for your post.

I know Twocando also plays a similar strategy as an add on to his existing strategies. It does work.

Cheers
jakk

[Boo_Ray]

Hi Boo_Ray,

Thanx for your post.

I know Twocando also plays a similar strategy as an add on to his existing strategies. It does work.

Cheers
jakk

Yes and it kind of makes sense 

[Twocando]

Hi Jakk and Boo_Ray

Dominant Pie and Star, this is the BANKER. Play 6 other numbers for safe bet to recover if banker lose.  Almost like dominant sector with dominant EC in this sector.   

Dominant sector = 10 pockets. If the dominant EC is LOW. Play then all the LOW numbers in this Dominant sector with 1 chip on each and play 1 Unit or 10 chips on HIGH, on the outside, EC bet.

Straight up pay 35/1 that will be 5 chips played and 10 chips on EC 35-14=21
EC 10 chips pay 1/1
Total played 15 chips payout is 10 - the 5 chips on the straight up numbers. = 5 profit.

In total you will bet on 18 numbers with the EC for HIGH and the 5 LOW numbers = 23 numbers.

If you just want to win with the straight up use the 5 chips profit from EC payout to increase the straight up or to add more straight up numbers ( 5 ) Then total numbers will be 28. 10 of these will be profit and 18 even out.


TCD

[roulettek]

I test the END 11 EXACT NUMBER DOCTRINE,  page 130.   Diagram G68, THE ROULETTE FORMULA book of Kimo LI, in the Roulette Xtreme 2.  0.   The exact number = 28.   152 spins; bankroll = 2000
It (the exact number 28) appeared in the spin 92 of 152.    The lost of the total bankroll occurred at the spin148 (- 40).  The highest balance 2189 units was at the spin 9 (without the exact number "28" appeared).  At the spin 20 the bankroll went down below 2000 units (permanently)
The simulations of some other combinations of a Single Global Pie merged with a single Global Star produced similar results.   It seems that this END system  is a loser system as many other IN THE LONG RUN.   Result attached.

[birdhands]

Twocando,
   Could you provide me with a link or something else to help me understand more fully what you are doing?  I am very interested and am having a difficult time finding the information.

Thanks a lot,
Sam

[roulettek]

[birdhands]

Exactly my point:  what is the ENDxy?  What is the GPM?  Do I need to just buy this guy's book?  Or is there another place to find the information.