Kens idea

[Nathan Detroit]

    fallacy  hell .

[NS]

There after number 27 hits it comes black. And I am not inventing it: nolinks://rouletteforum.cc/bet-selection/roulette-is-not-that-random/

That thread is pretty newbish.

That whole forum is more of a noobfest, and no one with true genuine facts about roulette can post there because it would get deleted. They don't want to know the truth, only lie to themselves and mislead others.

[Number Six]

Oh wow, do people really believe this stuff? I can't get over it.

More Numeris Tit-Anus scam nonsense. In fact, I have to agree with Advantage's Nob - the site is already been run by the old scammers that jumped ship when Steve took over - Thomas Grant et al. Good luck to 'em, I say. God knows they need it.

[NS]

More Numeris Tit-Anus

I lol'd.

[medo]

But it gets more dumb each day.

There after number 27 hits it comes black. And I am not inventing it: nolinks://rouletteforum.cc/bet-selection/roulette-is-not-that-random/

Why these posts are not deleted? Lack of moderation I say.

And why these posts should be deleted???Not because black should come after 27............
but because in another thread the same person says;----After 3,9,12,18,21,27,30,36 spuns,always bet red.
What a freak.

[Mr J]

"You have no business being a moderator" >>> Dont be jealous now. Still non-bias and you hate it.  Victors site, trash? I'll interpret that....around HERE, trash means you dont agree with a method or methods and thats fine. Thats what you mean by 'trash'. I said before (how fast we forget) if someone has a method that only bets on even numbers but only followed by an odd number, SO WHAT? Let them post it, why insult the person? You stick to your AP gamblers fallacy, what do I care? *MOST* of the people even in this discussion dont play anyways BUT hey, its something to do to kill time, post and argue. Must be nice to have that kind of free time on your hands. @mistarlupo >> I looked at the link, what am I suppose to take note of?  Ken

[Mr J]

"And why these posts should be deleted? Not because black should come after 27............
but because in another thread the same person says;----After 3,9,12,18,21,27,30,36 spuns,always bet red" >>> So what? Dont respond to it if it bothers you that much.  Ken

[medo]

"And why these posts should be deleted? Not because black should come after 27............
but because in another thread the same person says;----After 3,9,12,18,21,27,30,36 spuns,always bet red" >>> So what? Dont respond to it if it bothers you that much.  Ken

Who says it bothers me.....just shows me who is who here.

[mistarlupo]

@mistarlupo >> I looked at the link, what am I suppose to take note of?  Ken

That your idea does not have enough support.

[Steve]

It is an idea worth a try, but as it's been pointed out, it has already been tried and didnt do well.

The focus for moderation is as was also pointed out, members to report posts. Also removal of people who just cause trouble. It only takes ONE person to bring down a forum.

And also as was highlighted, a lot of members who create trouble apparently arent consistently troublemakers, ie behavior not quite bad enough to merit banning. So what to do? If someone is constantly creating trouble, even if they are contributing here and there, they may overall be bringing down the forum. I can warn such people, but they tend not to listen.

So the solution I feel is ultimately:

1. If members cant learn to just get along with others, even if they dont like them, then they'll be banned if they continue to attack personally. It is really not hard to co-exist with people you have a problem with. Members should know they are free to speak their mind, but when it becomes personal attacks and just constant sh*t stirring, that is trolling. I dont care if the attacker has a valid point - they should state their case, then get on with it. Not everyone is going to get along, but not getting along is different from existing to stir sh*t. If banning people results in them coming back under fake names, they'll get the same result - davey you are in this position, and really I should have banned you again for many reasons, so understand the position you are in. Threatening to bring hell upon me doesnt help - davey I have enough "friends" and it wont make a difference.

2. Members need to be more active in reporting posts, and from that I can see who the troublemakers are, and who is just trying to fend them off and get on with things.

[Steve]

On the note of banning people, if you are someone who gets banned, you would know why. Understand this: I dont give a crap about threats or revenge attacks like people such as charles did. It is petty and pathetic. If you are banned, it is because in my view, overall you are degrading the forum. If you are not happy with that decision, live with it - it's just a forum, and you would know you are stirring sh*t. If you just use the forum for its intended purpose, say what you want and dont make it personal, and therefore an unpleasant place, then you wont be banned. The problem is many people have the ind of personality that wants to get under peoples skin

[Mr J]

I actually want to see more AP threads, you heard me. lol I won't respond to them but I would like to see more participation FROM the other AP guys. Use some of that energy you have on method threads and use that for some AP threads, have fun. Funny question for you Steve.....when you are about to get back on the site after a weekend, I bet you are thinking, "what kind of bulls**t went on again"!? lol Am I right?  Ken

[Steve]

Funny question for you Steve.....when you are about to get back on the site after a weekend, I bet you are thinking, "what kind of bulls**t went on again"!? lol Am I right?

lol yeah pretty much. I used to care about some of the stuff that went on because people took advantage of me not being around (like organized attacks against me), but now I just dont care. Especially all the recent stuff happening here between various members is just a silly waste of time.

[Mr J]

You should thank me. Since I became a mod, the focus of attacks is on me, not you.    Ken

[Boo_Ray]

On the note of banning people, if you are someone who gets banned, you would know why. Understand this: I dont give a stuff about threats or revenge attacks like people such as charles did. It is petty and pathetic. If you are banned, it is because in my view, overall you are degrading the forum. If you are not happy with that decision, live with it - it's just a forum, and you would know you are stirring sh*t. If you just use the forum for its intended purpose, say what you want and dont make it personal, and therefore an unpleasant place, then you wont be banned. The problem is many people have the ind of personality that wants to get under peoples skin

That is just great! banning people who cause trouble and conversations not related to roulette... Finaly something good... Does that includes advertising, doubleposting and offtopic spaming? I guess NO.. Because everything started due to that... Remember? if not.. go back scroll a few pages back and also read the other threads... You expect us to change? but you and Mr J (take that as personal attack if you want) will continue to spam the board with adverts and Mr J with completely offtopic spam and disability to use forum... It is nice that you are creating forum for system sellers... The truth is that you will then just ban people who will tell you the truth like I did, but the point is that I was speaking for the normal users on this forum and trying to make this forum as it was not some kind of marketing comunity... But I guess you guys just don't get it because you guys (Steve and Mr J) take it as "personal attack" instead of looking what is wrong...  Now go back read thru some thread and answer me DID I STARTED ANYTHING OUT OF NOTHING?? USE SOME OF YOUR BRAINS if you can...
In fact you Steve started to attack me and telling me how unexperienced I am and how I don't have any knowledge when I came out with some truth and logical questions which you never answered..  Now you are whining abount "personal attacks" how someone will be banned for "personal attacks"... If I am about to sell s hit to other members and talking nonsense and braging about how super awsemoe I am (that is not just talking about you but some others to) I think it is normal that you get attacked... But instead of removing the source of the problem it is better to get rid of attackers.... SURE THE WAY TO GO Steve...I JUST BECAME YOUR NR1 FAN.. YOU ARE GENIUS!!!AWESOME IDEA!!!  Now I am going to make some T-shirts to wear because you are just breaking history, you are the one who invented that super concept how to make forum a better place!

If anyone else except Mr J, steve or gizmo disagrees with me.. Make us know

[Boo_Ray]

-