John Gold's Blog.

[John Gold]

Hello Insider,

I wrote a few pages dedicated to explaining how I play the method you are asking about. There is a page called 'live sessions' which covers a few of my games and shows where I entered the game.

For anybody else interested, this method Insider is asking about is betting on the 'sixlines' and not to be confused the street method I have recently talked about.

The pages can be found @ roulettegold.weebly.com

cheers

[John Gold]

@Insider,

Here is a 'sixline' game I played today at Dublinbet.

5
--
2) 2,3,5 (1,4,6)
2) 2,6 (1,3,4,5)
3) 1,2,3 (4,5,6)
1) 1,2,4 (3,5,6)
6) 1,5,6 (2,3,4)
5) 2,5 (1,3,4,6)
5) 5,6 (1,2,3,4)
4) 2,4,5 (1,3,6)
6) 2,6 (1,3,4,5)
1) 1,5 (2,3,4,6)
6) 1,5,6 (2,3,4)
2) 1,2 (3,4,5,6)
2) 2,6 (1,3,4,5)
2) 2,6 (1,3,4,5)
6) 4,5,6 (1,2,3)
6) 6 (1,2,3,4,5)
3) 3 (1,2,4,5,6)

Here is the W/L sequence for this particular game.

1. WW LLL WWWW LLL WWWWW
2. LLLL W L W LL WW LLL WWW
3. L W L WWWWWWWWWWWWW L
4. WWW L WWW L WWWWWW L WW
5. L WWW LLLL W LL WWW L WW
6. W L WW L W L W L W L W LLLL W

Needless to say I cleaned up here on the 3. The beautiful thing about playing for the 3 is how they are mostly all even money bets.

[John Gold]

I finally got around to doing some more testing with the idea that I presented on reply 176 of this blog.

I decided to use a progression which would take me into profit on any win. All the sessions were successful and did not fall behind by more than 100 units. I think the best way would be to quit after the first win and then start a new game. I will upload a picture which shows one of the games.

[attach=#]

[John Gold]

I suppose the big question is why should this work?

The 'rule of the third' has always fascinated me. I always get drawn back to it when thinking about ideas. 

My three column approach conforms to this rule. All three columns will roughly have 12 sleepers left after a 37 spin cycle.

Further research tells me that roughly 8 out of the 12 of those sleepers will appear in all three columns over the next 37 spin cycle. So it is kind of like a marker rather than a blank canvas. At least there appears to be something to work with.

So it is not unreasonable to expect some of those 8 numbers that are going to appear in each column to repeat once or twice.

Some of the added features are that a double hit could occur over the three columns and produce a bigger payout. Of course you could elect to limit a number to a maximum bet of 1 chip even if it qualified on all three columns and this would reduce the outlay. Maybe that's not such a bad idea when using a progression and the name of the game is just to get in front and start a new game.

I like this idea. Tests are positive and drawdowns not huge which is normally a common feature for sleeper methods.

[John Gold]

So taking a deeper look at the 'rule of the third'

Let's say you get 25/37 after the first 37 spin cycle. That leaves 12 sleepers (roughly 1/3)

Now the next 37 spin cycle will see 8 out of those 12 sleepers appear. That leaves 4 sleepers left out of the 12 (1/3)

This also means that roughly 16 or 17 numbers from the first cycle (25/37) will have to appear again as well to make up the new 25/37.

So the question is this.......

A guy just walking up to a wheel has no clue what's about to happen.

The second guy who just marked the first cycle of 37 spins knows that the second cycle should roughly show 16 or 17 numbers of the original 25/37.

Can this knowledge give him an edge in his ability to pick some winning numbers?

[John Gold]

just the sort of quick game you would love to see in real-live play.


[attachimg=#]

[John Gold]

LoL, talk about a quick game with some nice profit.

[attachthumb=#]


[attachthumb=#]

Can't get much better than that.

p.s. Also the beauty of the three column approach because all the wins came out in the 2nd + 3rd column.

[pins]

with the twelve sleepers. look for a unhit street or a corner  say 1.2.4. the five has played
  bets like that.  only tryed a few but looks promising. good luck

[John Gold]

Time to bring this back to life and update.

I don't play any of this stuff anymore.  The street method explained in detail on the web pages was the main method I played. It did work well for the most part, however it was far too laborious even for me.

Luckily I had the good fortune of coming across what I consider to be an excellent roulette strategy. I was able to tweak it using a few of my 'spare parts' and reduce it from an even money bet to a street bet. I have since narrowed it down even further to backing just single numbers.

I did start a thread called the Z-score challenge but asked for it to be removed because I thought it was unwise to share information which was given to me in private by someone else. On reflection, I should have kept the thread going because I am not going to reveal the method and therefore was doing no real harm.

I am going to try and make it available in a similar way to how Victor proposed to run his 'tipping tool' service. I am working on that at the moment.

I regard what I am playing now as a winning roulette bet. The facts don't lie. I have tore up Dr Wilson's acid test several times over.

I have done a fair bit of testing at several of the live online casinos as well and tests are positive.
I will post some screenshots of several games I have played in recent days.

A quick game tonight playing streets.

[attachthumb=#]

A game playing single numbers over several days.

[attachthumb=#]

[attachthumb=#]

[attachthumb=#]

The single numbers game at Smartlive was an attempt to turn a £10 deposit into £100 which was successful.

The current Dublinbet challenge on the streets is an ongoing mission   The 5 euro deposit could go far!

[revolver]

Really nice Mr. JG!!!

thanks for sharing!

[John Gold]

yeah, exciting times!!

The thing is that I am using these calculators which roughly tell you how likely your results are just down to chance.

A z-score of over 6.0 says the 'chance probability' is 0 or about one in infinity. Doing it once is maybe a fluke but doing it a few times kind of suggests that you are on the right track.

I kind of always knew that the biggest problem that a gambler faces is variance. Progressions are not the answer to deal with it as we all know. Now the less locations you bet should mean the higher swings in variance you are going to encounter. But a player who wants to win long term has to find a way to maximise his profit and you can't do that covering most of the wheel. A bias wheel player covering more than 9 numbers is a sloppy player in my opinion. Why give your edge away to the house. The same applies to what I am doing. No point covering 6-8 streets when you can get results covering 1-3.  There is no security in 'gambling'. So don't fool yourself for example thinking betting 2 dozens using a long progression is a safe bet. The only safe bet is a winning bet.

cheers

[revolver]

Yeah, i agree with you.

Progressions are not the answer.. NEVER, the answer is: STOP but the question is. WHEN? ... to know this, we have to know what is the limit of our bankroll, study a lot our system, and know when it fails, and how many percetange of the time it wins, so we have to know, when we are in the limit of profitable bet, or not. sorry if my english not too good.

Regards mr JG

[John Gold]

...update on the streets at dublinbet.

[attachthumb=#]

Another success using Dr Wilson's acid test.

'If you think you have a winning system, if you are a skeptic,
if you think you have a system, do yourself the following favor.
Play your system on paper for a length of time sufficient to double
your bankroll several times. Double it _three times, so that you
have eight times what you started with. Don't settle for winning
20 percent or 50 percent of your bankroll, or even doubling it just
once. Double it three times. Give it the acid test. Get into the
long run with it. My definition of the long run for testing a
system is the length of time sufficient to double your investment
three times.'

Well it's not my fault I can do it in the time it takes to microwave a meal.  
Seriously though, I will have to name it 'Tetris Turbo'.

[revolver]

 

[John Gold]

So back to smartlive and chucked in another £10.

Played a mix of single numbers/splits/streets.

Set a target of £50 and achieved it pretty quickly.

[attachthumb=#]


[attachthumb=#]

That's me finished online this week.

buy ins and profits.....

smartlive £10  win £100  profit = £90.

dublinbet £5  win £38  profit = £33.

smartlive £10  win £50  profit = £40.

Nothing too spectacular but nice steady wins for very little outlay and it did not take ages. 700% is better than my current account. 

[John Gold]

-