Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Catching the Heat EC method

Started by buffalowizard, January 28, 2011, 06:55:11 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard

This is something I was messing with today and was getting all excited about. The results speak for themselves.

I was tracking Black and Red but any EC would be ok.

Here's how to play it.

Wait for a run of 3 repeats

B
B
B

Then bet 3 times for a Black to return.

I am using marty for this part, so any win at this level and you're up 1 unit.

If no hit and you get 3 of the opposite

R
R
R

Then wait and retrack for 3 more repeats and then go again same again...

this time in my tests I was using 2,4,8 incurring a -5 loss in this second level.

I didn't get to the third level once in over 2500 spins, but would use 8,16,32.

Now an important part is the zero in all this. If it wasn't covered then I would have got to the third level on one occasion.

It also benefitted a few times to have it covered with a small amount, say a tenth of a unit.

Its really that simple....try it....I will post my results shortly, but I was surprised with how often the hits came in in the first step.

Let me know how you get on

Buffalo

buffalowizard

Each session between 80-150 spins:


Session 1      +7
Session 2      +9
Session 3      +10
Session 4      +4
Session 5      +8
Session 6      +2
Session 7      +4
Session 8      -5
Session 9      Level
Session 10    -2
Session 11    +6
Session 12    +9
Session 13    +6
Session 14    +12
Session 15    +5
Session 16    -3
Session 17    Level
Session 18    +15
Session 19    +4
Session 20    -1
Session 21    +13

You may not be winning hundreds of units but that's not the point here...I'm testing it's consistency and so far, so good I hope you agree.

It is also very quick and easy to check through numbers and check this

BW

buffalowizard


Just in case, here's a quick example...

13
31
33  3 blacks so bet for another black within next 3 spins
27
29  Win on the second  +1
12
9
1   3 reds
13
15
1   +2   
16
27
26
20   
19
28
36
6   
29
36
13   
8
20 3 blacks
8  +3
8
4
32
4
3
36   
1
7  +4
4
33
28
25
20 +5

BW

buffalowizard

I want to show you how a tough session looks, because I don't want to only cover it in glory, but it's interesting how it keeps pushing out of the muck, even when a loss hits you.

By the way, when a zero hits during a betting sequence, I have kept the units the same, as my maths can't work out if it would be a profit or loss. My thinking is it would even out over time.

10   
22
17
16
5
27  loss
25
16   
33
23
13
29   
23
6
25
1
17
31
24
5
33 Win on 2nd step -5
2
3
13   
1
30
29
9   
2
16
1
15
5
10
24   
21
20
8   
23
34
17
32
21
25
15
25 -4
2
9
23
25
23 -3
18
21
7
34 -2
28
4   
10
33 -1
32
7   
12
4
26   
16 0
8
35
4
1
23   
22 +1
31
11
1
27   
5
4
16 +2   
21
26
29
2   
21
0  win on zero
23
19
13
26
7
12
33
27
31
2
8
34   
32
7  loss
1
8
2
20
31  -3
8
22
23
36   
27
12 -2
15
32
3
15
1
36
6
28
31
14   
35  -1
15
0
27
13
20
0
32
4
32
13
29
3
9
19
6
1   0
19   
12
20
31
16
26
6
17
1
19
0  win on zero
20
22
23
12
21
34 +1
6
18
29
21
11
23
22
6   
13
36
2  +2
25
35
11   
11
30 loss
23
14
2   
35
24
26 -3
18
28
11
33
18
20 -2
31   
13
4
22 -1
30
2
1
2
15
15
35 0   
8
29
10
32
2  +1
28
15
35
5
7
31 +2   
33
30
11   
33
5
35
13
21
24
1
26
34
30
19
9   +3

buffalowizard

Thought I would run it through some numbers offered to me by a member:

Again, I'll play Black and Red

11
  24
  26
7   
12   
1   
23     +1 
18   
  20
1   
  26
34   
5   
25   
  15
  4
  26    1st step loss
1   
18   
  22
  22
  8
23   
1   
36     2nd step loss
36   
5   
30   
30     -12
  8
25   
25   
  15
16      -11
19   
30   
  15
  6
30   
3   
  24
  28
21   
18   
5   
21      -10
  15
  35
5   
14   
  4
  22
36   
25   
  8
14   
19   
16   
5      -9
18   
  6
  4
  11
  20   -8
18   
  6
  17
  17
9   
  29    -7
7   
3   
  31
25   
34   
  13
25   
  35
  20
  11    -6
5   
  24
  26
  2
  24    -5
  8
12   
  24
  24
  20
  20    -4
  4
18   
  31
34   
  31
  28
34   
7   
32   
3       -3
36   
  31
27   
21   
  17
  15
  17
1   
12   
  31     -2
  35
  10
34   
  2
  13
  8

32   
  6      -1
  17
  20
  22
32   
3   
  6       0
36   
  31
  33
  20
16   
32   
  11      +1
  33
21   
34   
  33
  20
32   
36   
  33
3   
32   
  29
  28
34   
  22
  6
32   
34   
27   
  35
14      +2
  29
  6
  17
9   
32   
  15     +3
  10
  24
  8
  33     +4

  31
  33
  22
18   
18   
16      1st level loss
9   
1   
  20
30   
  29
  6

27   
16   
23   
  2
19      -1
  2
16   
  26
  28
1   
7   
32   
  29
23       0
16   
14   
9   
30      +1
34   
  13
5   
  20
34   
  15
30   
  15
1   
  13
1   
  24
21   
14   
  33
32   
  11
  4
  10
30   
9   
  24    +2
  11
  11
19   
30   
  31
  10
25   
21   
  10
7   
12   
1   
19     +3
1   
3   
  2
  8
  35
  26    +4
36   
  26
36   
  28
16   
  26
  2
  29
  10    +5
  22
  29
  6
  20    +6
1   
  33
  8
  28   
  20    +7
  6
  4
16   
1   
36   
  17
  26
30      +8
7   
3   
  2
  31
  31
  22    +9
1   
14   
1   
  13
14      +10
18   
14   
  10
21   
  24
  6
  22
25   
23   
  29     +11
  22
  20

  20
  8
  8
0      win on zero
21   
  33   
  33
27   
19   
32   
  15
36      +12
  15
30   
25   
9   
  24
  26
  15     loss on 1st step
  28
  33
  24
  2      +7
32   
7   
19   
25      +8
21   
18   
27   
  33
1        +9
1   
  31
  2
25   
  26
  28
  13
  4      +10


A hard fought session indeed...including a double loss at the beginning, which I'm hoping is a rarity, but thankfully even this couldn't prevent it ending in the plus again.

BW

buffalowizard

Nice Nathan, thanks

This system just counts on those runs of three or more not spending too much time together!

Take it easy

BW

buffalowizard

Quick wiesbaden run

Ending +7

Though you see what I mean about the annoying losses which keep putting you back -5

I think 2 losses in a row are rare enough to warrant perhaps a more aggressive progression, it's certainly one to test anyway


17     
17     
    34
  0   
    25
10     
    3
    9
33     
    27
    23
8     
    7
    14
    12
    18     +1
    32
    16
    25
-- -- --
22     
31     
    16     +2
  0   
24     
    21
29     
15     
    1
    7
26     
    25
    7
    12
-- -- --
    36      +3
22     
    16
24     
17     
6     
20           +4
2     
28     
  0   
-- -- --
20     
    34
  0   
17     
    9
    36
    3
11     
    5         +5
29     
    3
-- -- --
    5
    7
15     
26     
31             loss
    25
    30
17     
-- -- --
    19
    12
    5
    23       0
    3
8     
20     
    21
    12
    23
    30      +1
    5
10     
-- -- --
    16
  0   
    36
    18
10     
29     
    34
    9
6     
20     
    5
31     
31     
    1
    34
4     
29     
    16
    32
     36
-- -- --
    23          +2
    30
    1
24     
    36
    5
    1
    9           +3
28     
    5
    36
    36
4     
17     
-- -- --
10               loss
    16
    23
35     
22     
    19
24     
    25
    3
    18
    14        -2
    32
28     
-- -- --
28     
35     
2            -1
    34
    21
    36
    3         0
    3
10     
-- -- --
10     
    16
    18
    19
13     
    19        +1
    1
    12
10     
    14
    36
8     
17     
-- -- --
    12
    23
15     
    3
15     
     19
    5
    27
    18          +2
-- -- --
17     
20     
    36
13     
    7
20     
  0   
    9
    27
    19
-- -- --
35     
    25       +3
    14
    9
     1
    23        +4
20     
    5
    14
    12
    25          +5
-- -- --
    3
4     
11     
    12
29     
    19
33     
    1
-- -- --
    34
35     
    7
   0   
6     
    3
    14
4     
    30
    34
2     
-- -- --
    18
13     
    12
    9
2     
6     
    34
35     
2     
6     
26           +6
35     
-- -- --
    5
15     
33     
29     
24          +7
4     
    19
31     
20     
    1
22     
15     
    32
6     
29     
    5
    9

col1879

Usually people wait for an EC to hit a certain number of times (eg 3) then start betting the opposite for a certain number of spins (eg 3)

I see merit to doing the opposite and using progression to bet on a repeat rather than opposite. The run that would really defeat you is BBBRRRBBBRRRBBBRRRBBB and you keep betting on the wrong one lol but that would be a rarity but it will happen at some point, it is just a matter of when.

I think the real key will be having a realistic profit/stop loss which you strictly adhere to. Also, using the right progression. Testing should reveal the best progression to use. Finally good money management is essential. Every time you reach a certain amount of profit keep half of and reinvest the other half. The magic number is 50%

I hope it continues to go well for you bw, keep up the good work!

buffalowizard

Yes col,

Stop/loss is essential and also how much you feel comfortable to win and then stop also.

You can quite easily play this with all 3 EC to speed up the process and get out when you hit your stopping point.

It seems very effective although you do need to have the bankroll to go 9 steps in case. I have never seen it go this far, except for when the zero is covered but like you say, the combination is always out there somewhere!

Good luck

BW

bakonlin

Quote from: buffalowizard on January 28, 2011, 06:55:11 PM
This is something I was messing with today and was getting all excited about. The results speak for themselves.

I was tracking Black and Red but any EC would be ok.

Here's how to play it.

Wait for a run of 3 repeats

B
B
B

Then bet 3 times for a Black to return.

I am using marty for this part, so any win at this level and you're up 1 unit.

If no hit and you get 3 of the opposite

R
R
R

Then wait and retrack for 3 more repeats and then go again same again...

this time in my tests I was using 2,4,8 incurring a -5 loss in this second level.

I didn't get to the third level once in over 2500 spins, but would use 8,16,32.

Now an important part is the zero in all this. If it wasn't covered then I would have got to the third level on one occasion.

It also benefitted a few times to have it covered with a small amount, say a tenth of a unit.

Its really that simple....try it....I will post my results shortly, but I was surprised with how often the hits came in in the first step.

Let me know how you get on

Buffalo


I played this method just today in Prestige casino,the single as well as the multiple player RNG,the live is not favourable for any player because of the small room between min and max.
Start exactly as described by buffalowizard,2 session got 25 unit,after several hours I again played 2 new sessions,but I noticed that in these sessions mostly the colour appeared only  3x in a row,so I bet the opposite after 3 colours appeared,eventually got 52 unit totally today.
I think this method made me quite cooler,as must wait 3 colour.The 3x progression ,sometime I ignored it as I still could not
control the chase lost habit,may be the luck on me today.
Anyway thanks buffalo. :good:

bakonlin

-