Suggestions for forum

[Steve]

Anyone got any suggestions, or ideas for the forum's improvement?

[Mr J]

I really cant come up with anything. Things are SLOW almost everywhere, not just gambling boards.

We have enough sections here, so thats out. Very little spamming. Very little arguing. Not sure what to say?

I think Richards board is 'done'.

Ken

[bombus]

Given the recent undertaking by gizmotron to share his reading random knowledge, I think he should be given the option to have his own section in which to post the lessons.

It could be set up as approved by gizmotron applicants only allowed to post (sorry Xman  ) with all forum members and guests allowed to read.

Access to post should be entirely up to gizmotron with banning rights within the section open to him and the mods. So if any posters get out of hand they can have their posting privileges revoked.

I suggest this in an effort to preempt the inevitable mudslide that will more than likely abolish the foundations of this exercise.  

[xman1970]

IF gizmo starts his own threads does that not mean he can delete posts himself anyway ??

Or has that changed ??

& yes LMFAO @ Bombus  

IF you do give him his own section, who will pay for the new doorways he will need in his house so that he doesn't scrap his head 

[Steve]

Bombus, dont use big words today. Head is fuzzy today.

Ok I added nolinks://vlsroulette.com/gizmotron%27s-section/

For now, anyone can post. But if that's a problem, I can create a specific group for him.

He has moderator privileges there. For the record, I understand that some people are against gizmo - who tend to give him a hard time. Maybe it is justified, but I really know nothing about him, at least not enough to judge. If anyone has first-hand knowledge of him being a shady character, please contact me directly rather than attacking him on the forum. Overall the forum has been quite a friendly place, besides the occasional rant, or return of the incredible sulk (ceh).

[gizmotron]

xman1970, in all the time that I spent with students, not one of them had an argument. It was just discussion. You are nothing but argument, same as Cheese. Well we don't need that. It's hard enough to communicate without needing to deal with your shit.

The mathboyz might not believe it but this is about finding , hunting , or searching for times when the probability is far outside of the base line average. These times occur in Roulette far more times than they do in black jack or other even chance games. I built a chart to show far more than just red & black, like the marquees offered at all casinos. This is just day one.

P.S. Thanks Steve.

[xman1970]

there's a good boy n pls DON'T tell me what I am & am not eh ??

don't worry I no no intention of posting in ANY of your "reading randomness" threads 

I will leave you to it, you know talking down to people/thinking your god's gift etc etc etc.....

it should ALL be a blast right ??

[bombus]

IF you do give him his own section, who will pay for the new doorways he will need in his house so that he doesn't scrap his head 

[gizmotron]

I guess I already passed this big head test. In Study Groups / Nature of Randomness Victor set me up with this section before he sold VLS to Steve. I can continue to do all this from that section. All I need is moderator in that section, whatever that means. I just want to discuss this without the GG type perpetual troll pests.

[harald]

Anyone got any suggestions, or ideas for the forum's improvement?

For me an improvement would be to delete the reactions in topics wich have nothing to to with the topic or forum. There's some people here who have no input what so ever....they only seem to complain, nag and ridicule others. Ofcourse this is a free forum but here i like to talk about roulette. 

[col1879]

In the Full Roulette Systems threads topics receive Star Ratings. These are useless. We need a separate Section of Approved/Qualified Systems. I am fed up wasting time testing useless systems. I know you might not want to recommend one particular system over the other but some are worthwhile and some are nonsense. For example, a recommend one may be Lanky's 6 point divisor and a nonsense one would be any of col1879 lol Obviously it should be a read only Section, accessed by mods only for editing/updating.

[Steve]

For me an improvement would be to delete the reactions in topics wich have nothing to to with the topic or forum. There's some people here who have no input what so ever....they only seem to complain, nag and ridicule others. Ofcourse this is a free forum but here I like to talk about roulette. 

It is near impossible for the moderators to see everything. The best way to deal with nuisance posters is to warn or ban repeat offenders. When I first took over this forum, it was full of the same people causing trouble. So I started removing particular people. While I of course received criticisms and attacks from such people, the forum is now a better place. So if you notice repeat offenders, it's up to the members to report them and give specific details of the problem. If it's just a new member, I dont bother with a warning and just remove them. If they're a longer-term member, they get a warning first.

In the Full Roulette Systems threads topics receive Star Ratings. These are useless. We need a separate Section of Approved/Qualified Systems. I am fed up wasting time testing useless systems. I know you might not want to recommend one particular system over the other but some are worthwhile and some are nonsense. For example, a recommend one may be Lanky's 6 point divisor and a nonsense one would be any of col1879 lol Obviously it should be a read only Section, accessed by mods only for editing/updating.

This is why I created nolinks.genuinewinner.com/truth.html and even put it in my signature. The problem is most people arent interested in the valid methods. But I'll look into what I can do with a review section.

[Steve]

Ok now I added the board nolinks://vlsroulette.com/roulette-system-reviews/

Anyone can add reviews, but people need to have legitimate experience of a system to write reviews. Once things are clear about a system, I'll add the review to nolinks.roulettesystemreviews.com

[dennisbelle]

The PM function seems to be disabled.  Is any one else having a problem sending PM's?

[Steve]

Fixed now, accidentally made a change

[Steve]

-