What is a trend ?

[MauiSunset]

Just for your information, those changes are not big enough to affect the ball enough. There are slight differences in the speed the ball leaves the track with, but its due to the ball running in the track with small kind of residues and dust that also attaches to the ball.  The bounce on the rotor makes much more damage to the prediction than those small speed changes that the ball leaves the track with.

But whatever makes your day. Not much point in trying to convince you. 

Ok, show me a study that someone has done to verify this.  This would be great for the Myth Busters on TV - they are constantly conducting experiments to test all kinds of legends.

Too many urban legends haunt the Roulette world.  We don't have anything like this in Black Jack and I must say my 2.5 month adventure in Roulette has been very entertaining so far.

I wonder what's next?  Ghosts of long dead gamblers haunting the Roulette tables causing all kinds of havoc on system players?

This is all bunk.....

[gizmotron]

Show you shit!

"Critical thinking, is a somewhat contested concept in the field of education due to the multiple philosophical frames in which it is contextualized but it generally refers to higher order thinking that questions assumptions."

"In a narrow sense, critical thinking has been described as "the correct assessing of statements." It has also been described popularly and narrowly as "thinking about thinking."

OK, show me a link where someone, a true critic, has devised a fool proof way to test a Roulette system?

Where is this fool proof test that the loudest braggarts here keep demanding?  If you can point to such a test I'll use it.

Too many of you have gotten away with bragging about how great Roulette players you are only to cower in the corner when a $25 prize is offered to you to demo what you brag about.  You have pitiful excuse after pitiful excuse.

In your case Gizmo, I still think mommy and daddy won't let you go to the casino by yourself..........

Man, you are a neophyte degenerate assumption of monumental proportions. There is no way I will lead you to qualification of true critical authenticity. You die all the time as a useless puke.

[MauiSunset]

Show you shit!

"Critical thinking, is a somewhat contested concept in the field of education due to the multiple philosophical frames in which it is contextualized but it generally refers to higher order thinking that questions assumptions."

"In a narrow sense, critical thinking has been described as "the correct assessing of statements." It has also been described popularly and narrowly as "thinking about thinking."

Man, you are a neophyte degenerate assumption of monumental proportions. There is no way I will lead you to qualification of true critical authenticity. You die all the time as a useless puke.

Psychobabble isn't going to help you in the casino - nor are your totally insane ideas of random numbers.

My $25 prize still is unclaimed - it would fatten up your piggy bank....

[Kelly]

Maui, its pretty simple and you can do it yourself. There are plenty of public roulette spins on you tube. Try measure how fast the last ball rotation takes and make 50 compares (on that wheel if there are 50 spins on the one you find). You will have a hard time to find a lot of exact equals, but they will all be in a narrow range. If you think its the moon that causes the difference, fine by me. What is interesting for me is the narrow range and the known strike point.

End of story from my end.

[MauiSunset]

Maui, its pretty simple and you can do it yourself. There are plenty of public roulette spins on you tube. Try measure how fast the last ball rotation takes and make 50 compares (on that wheel if there are 50 spins on the one you find). You will have a hard time to find a lot of exact equals, but they will all be in a narrow range. If you think its the moon that causes the difference, fine by me. What is interesting for me is the narrow range and the known strike point.

End of story from my end.

I know there is a whole cadre of folks who believe in all of this - why don't you folks just get together and conduct experiments?  Buy a wheel, identical to the ones in a casino (if that is even allowed), and start conducting experiments.

Buy a very accurate motor and spin the wheel and construct something to start the ball spinning - compressed air is probably the way to go.

Then run 10,000 tests and find out what happens.  The results will probably be enough to just stop testing - all bunk.

Then, if you wish, take the ball and apply some fat from rubbing it in your fingers a few seconds and watch what happens as the oil affects the ball and as the oil evaporates what happens there.

This should be easy to do if someone actually want's to know the truth.....

P.S.

Quite frankly if this hasn't been done by some group of gamblers by now, then this is really isn't a serious subject to debate.  The tests should have been done long ago by those who propose all this nonsense.

[gizmotron]

Psychobabble isn't going to help you in the casino - nor are your totally insane ideas of random numbers.

My $25 prize still is unclaimed - it would fatten up your piggy bank....

MauiShit = beggar


He demands explanations but admits that he only has done very little research into this game. He won't do the work that many of us have. Don't treat him with respect. He never earned it. Just say no to MauiSunset.

[MauiSunset]

MauiShit = beggar


He demands explanations but admits that he only has done very little research into this game. He won't do the work that many of us have. Don't treat him with respect. He never earned it. Just say no to MauiSunset.

I don't demand explanations - just calling your bluff on your insane ideas.  You are a Lunatic Gizmo - I wish there was a more polite way of saying it but you have insane ideas that I sure can't follow - maybe others can but what leaves your mouth is 100% gibberish.  Ask for different medications and see what happens.

I simply am offering a $25 prize and you would think that folks, like you Gizmo, would snap up that prize and laugh all the way to the bank.

Instead excuse after excuse after excuse - one must conclude that my $25 prize is beyond your grasp; which I feel confident, in your case Gizmo, is true.  Others, I'm curious to watch them play....

[gizmotron]

NO!

[pins]

another winning day. no trends no watching the ball.  i go to win two or three hundred dollars. only single numbers,   just back the numbers that recur.

[Zindrod]

I don't demand explanations - just calling your bluff on your insane ideas.  You are a Lunatic Gizmo - I wish there was a more polite way of saying it but you have insane ideas that I sure can't follow - maybe others can but what leaves your mouth is 100% gibberish.  Ask for different medications and see what happens.

I simply am offering a $25 prize and you would think that folks, like you Gizmo, would snap up that prize and laugh all the way to the bank.

Instead excuse after excuse after excuse - one must conclude that my $25 prize is beyond your grasp; which I feel confident, in your case Gizmo, is true.  Others, I'm curious to watch them play....

eeehhhh......$25 ?  "snap up the prize and laugh all the way to the bank"?  I wouldn't tell you my worst joke for $25 .... My toilet paper (5 ply) costs that a roll. Should rephrase "I simply am offering a $25 prize " to rather "I am offering a simple prize of $25" 

[gizmotron]

another winning day. no trends no watching the ball.  I go to win two or three hundred dollars. only single numbers,   just back the numbers that recur.

Look closer fool, you will find that I was feeding you a line. You took the bait idiot.

[darrynf]

another winning day. no trends no watching the ball.  I go to win two or three hundred dollars. only single numbers,   just back the numbers that recur.

pins, i dont know if you have notice but following the last numbers that recured is a trend!

you must be watching the ball to know what numbers recure.

[darrynf]

stop arguing with maui gizmo.

no need to get bent out of shape, its quite obvious he knows nothing and wants a simple system with out the work.

hes just there to antaganise people, he has nothing of value to say, hes just a broken record.

same shit new day.

[Mike]

Quite frankly if this hasn't been done by some group of gamblers by now, then this is really isn't a serious subject to debate.  The tests should have been done long ago by those who propose all this nonsense.

You're assuming that if all this were true (the physics and AP claims) then it should have been made public. Why on earth would anyone want to reveal an advantage and sell the goose which lays the golden egg?

You ask for links, kelly posted them and then you trash them. It's pretty clear you're only here to troll.

You say roulette "might" be beaten by money management, why don't you give us some of your ideas on this instead of antagonising members. Let's have some positive input from you. Anyone can criticise...

[pins]

notice i said recur. not repeat. the twelve plays the 19 is not far away. or vice versa.

[pins]

-