What Does Reading Random Mean

[Kelly]

So far you have just shown that you cant handle a real game that turns against you and a box with nothing that beats roulette.  Its always "when i eventually"....... yeah, the casinos are still there and spike and you are still at the starting line when it comes to show what you say you can do.  Personally i dont think you have placed more than 10 real bets in your life if you can get so messed up in so short time.

[gizmotron]

So far you have just shown that you cant handle a real game that turns against you and a box with nothing that beats roulette.  Its always "when I eventually"....... yeah, the casinos are still there and spike and you are still at the starting line when it comes to show what you say you can do.  Personally I dont think you have placed more than 10 real bets in your life if you can get so messed up in so short time.

Vaporware proceeding as expected:

holdYesListSingle -
holdMaybeListSingle -
holdYesListSleep - col3,
holdMaybeListSleep - red, odd, high, doz2, doz3, col1,


Actually I've shown that I can get a lame reaction from someone that is offered straws so that they will grasp at them. Thanks for being predictable.

[cheese]

Personally I dont think you have placed more than 10 real bets in your life if you can get so messed up in so short time.

Thats what puzzled me. He said he was going to bet 100 times, and after 6 bets, he threw up his hands in disgust and ran out of the room. For somebody that claims to have played roulette for 35 years, this makes no sense at all. 6 bets is nothing, its less than nothing.

[gizmotron]

Thats what puzzled me. He said he was going to bet 100 times, and after 6 bets, he threw up his hands in disgust and ran out of the room. For somebody that claims to have played roulette for 35 years, this makes no sense at all. 6 bets is nothing, its less than nothing.

And still you don't get it. I had no idea what a great and spontaneous moment that really was. I got way more out of it than expected. I moved on. But you are stuck to it scratching your head and trying to explain it. I even told you my real motives and actually set out to do what I really meant by it. But you two are scratching your heads.

Cheese / Spike, you are the perfect person, Father Roulette, for those that claim they learned nothing useful. How odd is it that like mentalities gravitate toward one another? You belong together. Father Roulette and his cult of comet chasers. Man you all drank the Kool-aid. This is getting good. When is the galactic harmonic gathering of the morons and the mother ship?

[cheese]

And still you don't get it.

Oh, I get it, we ALL get it. We got it immediately. No worries...

[cheese]

Are you really taking the roulette outcomes and turning them into a counting game like BJ, or are you just using that as an example as it relates to card counting and BJ?

Its an example. There is nothing to count in roulette.

[gizmotron]

Oh, I get it, we ALL get it. We got it immediately. No worries...

"No worries?" I don't think so. You can't stop bringing it up. And yet the only way for you to explain it is with it patting yourself on your own back how wonderful you are. I think you now use it as a crutch. I've explained it. I was there. You have no idea what my motives where. That is clear by your pathetic remarks. But since you are glued to it by your own admission, I will turn it on you as a contradiction, an epiphany, and a paradox.

I know, more promises about something that is to come later. That's your rant you know. I'm the one actually working here. You are the butt cleaner at the zoo.

[cheese]

I've mentioned them for years on this forum. It works very good, it works very badly, or it's mixed with both good and bad. In the end that's what you must be aware of.

If thats happening, you have a method that works part of the time. This is what most people have. You need to keep looking until you have a method where its always good, all the time. Thats why you spend 10 hours in the casino to win a few units, you've got half a method.

[cheese]

"No worries?" I don't think so. You can't stop bringing it up.

I bring it up because I can't believe you did it. I'm still in shock. The outcome was a foregone conclusion. I didn't think it would happen after 6 bets, I thought you'd hang in there for at least 15. It all worked out in the end. If you don't want people bringing it up, you should have thought of that when agreed to the demo. Duh.

[gizmotron]

If thats happening, you have a method that works part of the time. This is what most people have. You need to keep looking until you have a method where its always good, all the time. Thats why you spend 10 hours in the casino to win a few units, you've got half a method.

Typical conclusion. And I don't spend ten hours to reach my goal. I spent ten hours to play hot number guessing with 300 spins. That was decades ago. Why do you struggle with context? Are you stupid? So you don't get it.

You must be kidding that I would take your feeble advice. By your own admission you can't deal with chaos. That's what you called it more than a year ago. If you have trouble with that just look up your own words in the archives. I guess you have "a method that works part of the time" too. Pot Kettle Black.

[gizmotron]

I bring it up because I can't believe you did it. I'm still in shock. The outcome was a foregone conclusion. I didn't think it would happen after 6 bets, I thought you'd hang in there for at least 15. It all worked out in the end. If you don't want people bringing it up, you should have thought of that when agreed to the demo. Duh.

You are such an ignorant Father Roulette. That's a bonus for your followers I'll bet. The odds for that three step progression to fail the first time it was tried was nearly a thousand to one. And you pretend that you know something with it failing in fifteen spins. That makes you the Zen Buddha of the "DUH" chanters. 

[cheese]

>>If you have trouble with that just look up your own words in the archives. I guess you have "a method that works part of the time" too.>>

My opinion on chaos has evolved, thats what happens when you constantly work at something. All the spins in roulette are chaotic. It can't be any other way. The method I use works all the time. I always know where I am 100% of the time, where my method is in the unfolding chaotic events. You have to come to a place where you truly believe the spins are unconnected, independent events. There are no better bets, no better places to bet, its an illusion. The marquee has probably done more damage to how the player thinks about the game than anything else. Why do you think the casino uses it. Their profits went up 30% overnight after they started installing tote boards. think about it.

[VKM]

You are such an ignorant Father Roulette. That's a bonus for your followers I'll bet. The odds for that three step progression to fail the first time it was tried was nearly a thousand to one. And you pretend that you know something with it failing in fifteen spins. That makes you the Zen Buddha of the "DUH" chanters.  

A different point of view:

Am I  the only one that thought that Gizmo made the Right move by ending the challenge session when it started off extremely negative?  It made sense to me.  

VKM

 

[gizmotron]

>>If you have trouble with that just look up your own words in the archives. I guess you have "a method that works part of the time" too.>>

My opinion on chaos has evolved, thats what happens when you constantly work at something. All the spins in roulette are chaotic. It can't be any other way. The method I use works all the time. I always know where I am 100% of the time, where my method is in the unfolding chaotic events. You have to come to a place where you truly believe the spins are unconnected, independent events. There are no better bets, no better places to bet, its an illusion. The marquee has probably done more damage to how the player thinks about the game than anything else. Why do you think the casino uses it. Their profits went up 30% overnight after they started installing tote boards. think about it.

That's fine. So I know for a fact that your guessing is not 100% correct for every spin. So you have a method that does not work all the time. It's still Pot Kettle Black. And there must be times when your guesses hit a downturn. That's the nature of randomness. You must have a good reaction for when that happens. You are not fooling me.

I don't need to be lectured to by you about independent spins and randomness. I knew all that long before I ever met you. I've just been waiting for you to figure it out. Now you act like you are the only one that knows these things. Try as you might, I just don't need your Father Roulette guidance.

[gizmotron]

A different point of view:

Am I  the only one that thought that Gizmo made the Right move by ending the challenge session when it started off extremely negative?  It made sense to me.  

VKM

It surprised me. It blew up in my face, a thousand to one and it blew up in my face. All I could do is laugh. The smart move was to end the session. I was only going to use the progression about four or five times. I wanted to mix things up so that nobody could define my method. But to have Cheese and Kelly drag it out as proof made it even more valuable. They are stuck to it like glue. I could have won ten sessions and not accomplished that much from them. They are perfect. I got to laugh at what happened and I got them acting stupid too. It's all good.

[gizmotron]

-